Positively Charged Particle in a Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
A positively charged particle enters a magnetic field directed out of the page, with its velocity oriented upward. The force acting on the particle can be determined using the equation F = Qv × B. According to the right-hand rule, the magnetic force on the particle is indeed directed horizontally to the right. The discussion clarifies a mix-up regarding the use of the left-hand rule, confirming that the right-hand rule is the correct convention. This highlights the importance of accurately applying the right-hand rule in physics problems involving magnetic forces.
amcavoy
663
0
In the attached figure (also at http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3231/lorentz5sa.png" ) is a positively charged particle entering a magnetic field that points out of the page. The velocity of the particle is in the upward direction, orthogonal to the magnetic field.

My only question is, based on the equation \vec{F}=Q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}, am I correct to say that the force due to the magnetic field is horizontally to the right?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • lorentz.png
    lorentz.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 513
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
amcavoy said:
In the attached figure (also at http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3231/lorentz5sa.png" ) is a positively charged particle entering a magnetic field that points out of the page. The velocity of the particle is in the upward direction, orthogonal to the magnetic field.

My only question is, based on the equation \vec{F}=Q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}, am I correct to say that the force due to the magnetic field is horizontally to the right?

Thank you.
yes, that's correct
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes you can say that by using the left hand rule.
 
gem0688 said:
yes you can say that by using the left hand rule.
I am not sure if that was a typo or a joke, so just in case...
Amcavoy is correct by the standard convention which is the right hand rule.
 
Last edited:
JustinLevy said:
I am not sure if that was a typo or a joke, so just in case...
Amcavoy is correct by the standard convention which is the right hand rule.

soz, typo! :blushing: :redface:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top