- #1
jangheej
- 19
- 0
Hi
I have a simple question about thin-film peeling physics.
A lot of papers say that the potential energy term in peeling off a tape is F(1-cos@)del c in the picture attached. It says that the potential energy term arises due to the movement of the applied force, which i don't really understand.
(1)How is the movement of the force related to the potential energy increase of thin film peeling?
Also, I did an experiment with varying @ and checked that the equation R(adhesive energy) = F(1-cos@)del c is reasonable.
But another question is, when I pull the tape in another direction (the direction in which we would usually peel off the tape), following the same logic, the equation then becomes R=F(1+cos@)del c. So I also drew a graph of F and 1/(1+cos@), but in this case, it didnt show a linear relationship as it should but showed an inverse relationship.
(2)In the second case of peeling, is the equation that I derived wrong or right?
thnx! :D
I have a simple question about thin-film peeling physics.
A lot of papers say that the potential energy term in peeling off a tape is F(1-cos@)del c in the picture attached. It says that the potential energy term arises due to the movement of the applied force, which i don't really understand.
(1)How is the movement of the force related to the potential energy increase of thin film peeling?
Also, I did an experiment with varying @ and checked that the equation R(adhesive energy) = F(1-cos@)del c is reasonable.
But another question is, when I pull the tape in another direction (the direction in which we would usually peel off the tape), following the same logic, the equation then becomes R=F(1+cos@)del c. So I also drew a graph of F and 1/(1+cos@), but in this case, it didnt show a linear relationship as it should but showed an inverse relationship.
(2)In the second case of peeling, is the equation that I derived wrong or right?
thnx! :D