Power and Efficiency without mass?

In summary, the textbook solution is poor due to incorrect use of units, premature plugging in of numbers, and lack of need to find an energy.
  • #1
sbrads87
1
0
Homework Statement
Possible error in text (has happened before.)
A basketball loses 35% of its kinetic energy when it hits the floor. Initially dropped from a height of 1.2m. How much time will it be in the air between 3rd and 4th bounces?
Relevant Equations
Ek = Eg = mgh = m(9.81)(1.2)

s = v2t-1/2at^2
Really perplexed me as the answer provided does not solve for mass ... seemingly wants to use mass as a unit of height? Or perhaps I'm off base ... really just curious if this is even correct or possible?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 20230303_225314.jpg
    20230303_225314.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 81
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds okay. Is the answer going to be different depending on the mass of the b-ball ?
 
  • #4
It is correct. The solution shows that the answer is independent of the mass. Look at it this way. If you drop a mass from height ##h_0##, its mechanical energy before the bounce is ##E_0=mgh_0##. If it loses 35% of that during the bounce, it will have ##KE_1=0.65mgh_0## left in the form of kinetic energy.

Question: To what maximum height ##h_1## will the ball rise?
Answer: $$mgh_1=KE_1=0.65mgh_0\implies h_1=0.65h_0.$$Note that the answer is independent of the mass. If you drop two unequal masses, they will hit the floor at the same time; if in addition they lose the same fraction of energy after the bounce, they will rise to the same maximum height.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #5
The textbook solution is poor in several ways.

1. It plugs in numbers without units. E.g. we read "##mgh=11.8m##" instead of "##mgh=m\cdot 11.8m^2/s^2##". That may be why you thought it was turning mass into a distance.

2. It plugs in numbers too soon. By leaving g as g it would have cancelled out in the first part, as @kuruman shows in post #4. That makes for less work and greater accuracy.

3. It was never necessary to find an energy. Since after three bounces it will only have ##0.65^3## of its initial energy, we know it will rise to a height of ##1.2\cdot 0.65^3=0.33##m. After that, it is just a matter of finding how long it takes to fall to the ground from that height and doubling it.
 

FAQ: Power and Efficiency without mass?

What is meant by "Power and Efficiency without mass"?

"Power and Efficiency without mass" refers to the concept of achieving high levels of power output and operational efficiency in systems or devices without relying on significant physical mass. This can involve leveraging advanced materials, innovative design principles, or cutting-edge technologies to optimize performance while minimizing weight.

How can power be generated without adding mass?

Power can be generated without adding mass by using technologies such as electromagnetic systems, advanced battery technologies, or energy harvesting techniques. For example, piezoelectric materials can convert mechanical stress into electrical energy, and lightweight photovoltaic cells can harness solar power without significantly increasing the mass of the system.

What are the benefits of achieving efficiency without mass?

Achieving efficiency without mass offers numerous benefits, including improved performance, reduced energy consumption, and enhanced portability. In aerospace and automotive industries, it can lead to better fuel efficiency and longer range. In consumer electronics, it can result in longer battery life and lighter devices.

What are some real-world applications of power and efficiency without mass?

Real-world applications include lightweight drones with extended flight times, electric vehicles with improved range, portable medical devices with longer battery life, and wearable technology that is both powerful and comfortable. Additionally, in space exploration, reducing mass is critical for cost-effective and efficient missions.

What challenges exist in achieving power and efficiency without mass?

Challenges include developing materials that are both lightweight and durable, integrating new technologies into existing systems, and managing heat dissipation in compact designs. Additionally, there can be trade-offs between power, efficiency, and cost, which need to be carefully balanced to achieve optimal results.

Back
Top