- #36
Baluncore
Science Advisor
2023 Award
- 15,532
- 9,290
The shielding problem is hardest to solve in the audio frequency magnetic range. A current induced to flow around an outer face will couple into a parallel inner wall in the same way that a single turn transformer operates. Separation distance is not going to be critical so long as there is only one ground connection to an adjacent shell to prevent ground loops.
I think the design key is that a structural wall needs some thickness. Use that thickness to your benefit but do not exaggerate it. If you are building a portable room it will have cellular construction. If your room is fixed inside an existing building it can be an isolated double wall enclosure. There is a limit to the attenuation required, somewhere around the thermal noise floor in your instruments. Enough is sufficient, an extra layer of foil will not hurt, but it will cost time and money, and makes no difference to the shielding.You should take a look at these two publications I found on the web;
1. Theory, Design And Engineering Evaluation Of Radio-Frequency Shielded Rooms. Aeronautical Electronic and Electrical Laboratory. REPORT NO. NADC-EL-54129 13 AUG 1956. BUREAU OF AERONAUTICS TED Project No. ADC EL-538. 125 pages, 10.2Mbyte.
2. Military Handbook. Radio Frequency Shielded Enclosures. MIL-HDBK-1195. 30 SEPTEMBER 1988. U.S. Navy. 86 pages, 370kbyte.
Also, if you can find a copy, see; Architectural Electromagnetic Shielding Handbook. A Design and Specification Guide. Leland H. Hemming, 1992, IEEE Press. 229 pages.
I think the design key is that a structural wall needs some thickness. Use that thickness to your benefit but do not exaggerate it. If you are building a portable room it will have cellular construction. If your room is fixed inside an existing building it can be an isolated double wall enclosure. There is a limit to the attenuation required, somewhere around the thermal noise floor in your instruments. Enough is sufficient, an extra layer of foil will not hurt, but it will cost time and money, and makes no difference to the shielding.You should take a look at these two publications I found on the web;
1. Theory, Design And Engineering Evaluation Of Radio-Frequency Shielded Rooms. Aeronautical Electronic and Electrical Laboratory. REPORT NO. NADC-EL-54129 13 AUG 1956. BUREAU OF AERONAUTICS TED Project No. ADC EL-538. 125 pages, 10.2Mbyte.
2. Military Handbook. Radio Frequency Shielded Enclosures. MIL-HDBK-1195. 30 SEPTEMBER 1988. U.S. Navy. 86 pages, 370kbyte.
Also, if you can find a copy, see; Architectural Electromagnetic Shielding Handbook. A Design and Specification Guide. Leland H. Hemming, 1992, IEEE Press. 229 pages.