Power Radiated From a Copper Cube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the power radiated from a copper cube using the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The initial calculations, using an emissivity of 1, a surface area based on a 1 cm edge length, and a temperature of 340°C, yield a radiated power of approximately 4.8 W. However, the provided answer key states the correct answer is 19 W, which corresponds to a cube with a 2 cm edge length. Participants suggest verifying the problem parameters with the instructor, as the initial calculations appear accurate for the given dimensions. The discrepancy highlights the importance of confirming problem details in physics assignments.
Randomized10
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What power is radiated from a 340°C copper cube 1.0cm on a side? Assume an emissivity of 1

A. 0.76 W
B. 1.8 W
C. 3.4 W
D. 8.0 W
E. 19 W
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{dQ}{dt}=e\sigma AT^4$$
##e## is emissivity
##\sigma## is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, ##5.67*10^{-8} W m^{-2} K^{-4}##
A is the surface area
T is the temperature
##\frac{dQ}{dt}## is the rate of heat transfer or radiated power

At first glance this appeared to be an easy problem, just plug in the values and go, so that's what I did. ##e=1##, ##\sigma=5.67*10^{-8} Wm^{-2}K^{-4}##, ##A=6*(1cm)^2=6*(0.01m)^2=6*0.0001m^2=0.0006m^2=6*10^{-4}m^2##, and ##T=340^{\circ}C=613.15K##. After plugging in the values I got ##\frac{dQ}{dt}=1*5.67*10^{-8}*6*10^{-4}*613.15^4=3.402*10^{-11}*1.4134*10^{11}=4.808W##, but that isn't one of the possible answers no matter how you round it. The answer key says that the correct answer is 19 W, but I don't know how to get there. I tried working out the math using Celsius instead of Kelvin, and got ##\frac{dQ}{dt}=0.4546W##, which isn't right either. Any insights as to what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My calculation agrees with yours. This is not the first time that the correct solution does not match any of the offered answers. I suggest that you show your answer to the person who assigned you this problem because he/she/ze/they needs to know.
 
  • Like
Likes Randomized10
I agree with @kuruman. Your answer of 4.8 W looks correct. The answer of 19 W corresponds to an edge length of 2.0 cm.
 
  • Like
Likes Randomized10
Ok, I'll talk to the professor. Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top