MHB Pramod's question at Yahoo Answers regarding angle sum/difference identities

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle identities
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the angles when an angle α is divided into two parts, where the tangent of one part is m times that of the other. The key equation derived is sin β = [(m - 1) / (m + 1)] sin α, which expresses the sine of the difference between the two angles in terms of the sine of the original angle. The proof utilizes the angle sum and difference identities for sine, leading to the conclusion that the relationship holds true under the given conditions. The mathematical derivation involves manipulating trigonometric identities and establishing a connection between the angles involved. This provides a clear understanding of the angle sum/difference identities in trigonometry.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

If an angle α be divided into two parts such that the tangent of one ......?


If an angle α be divided into two parts such that the tangent of one part is m times the tangent of the other then prove that their difference β is obtained from the equation :

sin β = [ ( m - 1 ) / ( m + 1 ) ] sin α.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP may view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Pramod,

Let's divide the angle $\alpha$ into the two angles $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$. Hence:

$$\alpha=\alpha+1+\alpha_2$$

And let's define:

$$\beta=\alpha_2-\alpha_1$$

$$\tan\left(\alpha_2 \right)=m\tan\left(\alpha_1 \right)$$

which implies:

$$\sin\left(\alpha_2 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_1 \right)=m\sin\left(\alpha_1 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_2 \right)$$

Now, let's then state:

$$\sin(\beta)=k\sin(\alpha)$$

Using the definitions, we may write:

$$\sin\left(\alpha_2-\alpha_1 \right)=k\sin\left(\alpha+1+\alpha_2 \right)$$

Using the angle sum and difference identities for sine, we obtain:

$$\sin\left(\alpha_2 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_1 \right)-\cos\left(\alpha_2 \right)\sin\left(\alpha_1 \right)=k\sin\left(\alpha_2 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_1 \right)+k\cos\left(\alpha_2 \right)\sin\left(\alpha_1 \right)$$

$$(1-k)\sin\left(\alpha_2 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_1 \right)=(1+k)\sin\left(\alpha_1 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_2 \right)$$

Using $$\sin\left(\alpha_2 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_1 \right)=m\sin\left(\alpha_1 \right)\cos\left(\alpha_2 \right)$$ we obtain:

$$m(1-k)=1+k$$

$$m-mk=1+k$$

$$m-1=k(m+1)$$

$$k=\frac{m-1}{m+1}$$

Hence, we may state:

$$\sin(\beta)=\frac{m-1}{m+1}\sin(\alpha)$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top