Pressure versus stress in uniformly charged sphere

  • #1
Rob2024
11
1
Homework Statement
What's the pressure and stress at a distance r within a uniformly charged sphere?
Relevant Equations
$E (r) = \frac{Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3}$
$\sigma(r) = \half \epsilon_0 E^2$
Let the charge density be $\rho$, radius be $R$, total charge be $Q = \rho \frac{4}{3} \pi R^3$. We know
from Gauss's law, $E (r) = \frac{Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3}$.

We also know from Maxwell stress tensor $\sigma(r) = \half \epsilon_0 E^2$.

We can compute the pressure due to the electric field directly, it causes the charge pressing outward due to
repulsion. Take a spherical layer of charge at distance $r$ whose area is $A = 4 \pi r^2$, apply force balance,
$P(r+dr) A - P(r) A = dq E = \rho 4\pi r^2 dr E$
$dP = \rho E dr = \frac{\rho Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3} dr$
$P = \half \frac{k Q \rho r^2}{R^3}$
$P = 3 \half \e\spilon_0 E^2 = 3 \sigma$

Why is the pressure derived directly different from the one from Maxwell's stress tensor? Are they different in physical meaning?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Please rewrite this post in readable LaTeX format. There is a handy LaTeX guide at the left below.
 
  • #3
On this forum you need to use a double hash (# #, without the space) instead of $.
And \half is not recognized.
—————————
Homework Statement: What's the pressure and stress at a distance r within a uniformly charged sphere?
Relevant Equations: ##E (r) = \frac{Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3}##
##\sigma(r) = \frac 12 \epsilon_0 E^2##

Let the charge density be ##\rho##, radius be ##R##, total charge be ##Q = \rho \frac{4}{3} \pi R^3##. We know
from Gauss's law, ##E (r) = \frac{Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3}##

We also know from Maxwell stress tensor ##\sigma(r) = \frac 12 \epsilon_0 E^2##

We can compute the pressure due to the electric field directly, it causes the charge pressing outward due to
repulsion. Take a spherical layer of charge at distance ##r## whose area is ##A = 4 \pi r^2##, apply force balance,
##P(r+dr) A - P(r) A = dq E = \rho 4\pi r^2 dr E##
##dP = \rho E dr = \frac{\rho Q r}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3} dr##
##P = \frac 12 \frac{k Q \rho r^2}{R^3}##
##P = 3 \frac 12 \epsilon_0 E^2 = 3 \sigma##

Why is the pressure derived directly different from the one from Maxwell's stress tensor? Are they different in physical meaning?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Rob2024
  • #4
Hi, I am asking again to see if people have some ideas why the normal stress value is different from pressure? I had thought that they would be the same. Thanks,
 
  • #5
Rob2024 said:
##P(r+dr) A - P(r) A = dq E = \rho 4\pi r^2 dr E##
I'm not sure about this. That layer is subject to electrostatic forces from outside as well. Doesn't that reduce the pressure difference required to balance the force from inside?
 
  • Like
Likes Rob2024
  • #6
Thanks for the correction. With the correction, the pressure is 3/2 of the normal stress. After discussing with a professor, I believe the use of the word stress in this case is not to be confused with stress in elastic material since the Maxwell stress is not 0 in vacuum outside of the sphere. Let me know if any additional enlightenment can be shed on this question. Thanks.
 
  • #7
Rob2024 said:
We can compute the pressure due to the electric field directly, it causes the charge pressing outward due to
repulsion. Take a spherical layer of charge at distance ##r## whose area is ##A = 4 \pi r^2##, apply force balance,
##P(r+dr) A - P(r) A = dq E##
I don’t think this way of deriving ##P(r)## is correct.

The area at ##(r+dr)## is ##4 \pi (r+dr)^2 = 4 \pi (r^2 + 2rdr + dr^2)##. The term ##dr^2## in the parentheses can be neglected, but not the term ##2rdr##. So, I believe leaving out this term is a mistake.

I’m uncomfortable using an entire spherical shell to deduce ##P(r)##. Instead, consider an infinitesimal circular disk of material inside the sphere as shown.

1730236357349.png



Let ##a## be the (infinitesimal) radius of the disk and ##dz## the thickness of the disk. Let ##r## be the distance from the center of the sphere, ##O##, to the center of the bottom surface of the disk. The distance from ##O## to the center of the top of the disk is then ##r+dz##. Let ##A## be the area of the bottom (or top) of the disk. So, the volume of the disk is ##dV = Adz##

The electric force ##F_z^{\rm elec}## experienced by the disk will be in the ##z## direction: ##F_z^{\rm elec} = \rho dV E(r)##.

The net pressure force ##F_z^{\rm pr}## on the disk must be equal and opposite to the electric force: $$F_z^{\rm pr} = P(r)A – P(r+dz)A = - \rho dV E(r).$$ Approximating ##P(r+dz) \approx P(r) + P’(r)dz##, show $$P’(r) = \rho E(r) = \frac{\rho^2 r}{3\varepsilon_0}.$$ I think this is what you got. But, as I mentioned above, I don’t believe your derivation is correct.

When you integrate the expression for ##P'(r)##, you need to allow for a constant of integration. If there is no externally applied pressure at the surface of the sphere, then ##P(R) = 0##. Use this boundary condition to find the constant of integration.

The Maxwell stress tensor components ##T_{ij}## are not directly related to the material pressure ##P(r)##. In electrostatics, the Maxwell tensor ##\overleftrightarrow{T}## has the following property. If ##S## is a closed surface, then ##\large \oint_S \normalsize \overleftrightarrow{T} \cdot \vec{dA}## equals the net electric force on the total charge enclosed by ##S##. Here, ##\vec {dA}## represents an outward pointing element of area of ##S##. For example, if you let ##S## be the surface of the circular disk used in the discussion above, then evaluation of ##\large \oint_S \normalsize \overleftrightarrow{T} \cdot \vec{dA}## gives the result ##\rho dV E(r)## as expected.
 
Back
Top