MHB Probability of a Hand Consisting of Clubs or 2 Suits: Answers & Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probabilities of specific card hands from a standard 52-card deck. The probability of drawing a hand consisting entirely of clubs is approximately 0.000495, while the probability of a hand consisting entirely of one suit is about 0.001981. For hands containing both diamonds and hearts, the probability is around 0.02432, and the probability of a hand containing cards from exactly two suits is approximately 0.145918. Participants confirm the correctness of these calculations and discuss the logic behind determining the number of combinations for hands with diamonds and hearts. Overall, the calculations and methods presented are validated by the participants.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
A deck of 52 cards is mixed well, and 5 cards are dealt.(a) It can be shown that (disregarding the order in which the cards are dealt) there are 2,598,960 possible hands, of which only 1287 are hands consisting entirely of clubs.
What is the probability that a hand will consist entirely of clubs? (Give the answer to six decimal places.)
1287/2598960= 4.951980792 x 10^-4

What is the probability that a hand will consist entirely of a single suit? (Give the answer to six decimal places.)

.001981=1287/2598960*4

(b) It can be shown that exactly 63,206 hands contain only diamonds and hearts, with both suits represented.
What is the probability that a hand consists entirely of diamonds and hearts with both suits represented? (Give the answer to five decimal places.)
63206/2598960=.024320

(c) Using the result of Part (b), what is the probability that a hand contains cards from exactly two suits? (Give the answer to five decimal places.)
6*(63206/2598960)=.145918

I am curious if these are the correct answer.

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Cbarker1,

I get the same answer for the all clubs hand. Can you walk me through your logic for the diamonds and hearts question? I would like to hear how you approached it. :)
 
Using the information above in part a, 2598960 and using the other information, 63206.

63206/2598960
 
Sorry, I didn't see that this was given to you. I thought you should figure out how to get those numbers.

For example, if we want to have a hand with all diamonds and all hearts, then there are 4 possible situations:

1H 4D, 2H 3D, 3H 2D, 4H 1D

To calculate the number of combos we can do this: $$\binom{13}{1}\binom{13}{4}+\binom{13}{2}\binom{13}{3}+\binom{13}{3}\binom{13}{2}+\binom{13}{4}\binom{13}{1}=63206$$

That's how they got that number.

So yep, all of your answers look good to me. (Yes)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top