MHB Probability of AT LEAST 3 6s in 5 Dice Rolls

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the probability of rolling at least three sixes with five six-sided dice, the equation should be set up by adding the probabilities of exactly three, four, and five sixes. The probability of exactly three sixes is calculated using the combination formula, resulting in approximately 0.03215. For exactly four sixes, the probability is about 0.003215, and for five sixes, it is approximately 0.0001286. By summing these probabilities, one can determine the overall probability of rolling at least three sixes. This method is more effective than subtracting from total occurrences.
Peter Mole
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
I've been teaching myself Probability Mathematics, but I'm still struggling.

Please help me understand with an example.
Say I roll five six-sided dice all at once, with die faces numbered 1 through 6.
I want to determine the probability of AT LEAST three 6s occurring. First, is this the best way to set up the equation?

P(at least three 6s) = 1 - P(zero 6s) - P(exactly one 6) - P(exactly two 6s)

Or can the equation be better setup by subtracting AT LEAST occurrences?

I know this much...
P(zero 6s) = 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 = 3,125/7,776 = 0.40188
P(all 6s) = 1/6 * 1/6 * 1/6 *1/6 * 1/6 = 1/7,776
P(at least one 6) = 1 - P(zero 6s) = 4,651/7,776

To restate my whole problem, I'm unclear on the best way to calculate for "exactly 2" occurrences. Likewise for "exactly 3" or any other "exact" occurrence more than one but less than equal to the total number of dice thrown.

Thanks for your help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't subtract. I would add. Rolling 5 dice, "at least three sixes" means 3 or 4 or 5. Calculate each of those separatelt then add them. On anyone toss, the probability of a "six" is 1/6, the probability of anything else is 5/6.

a) Exactly 3 sixes. The probability of 3 sixes and 2 non-sixes in that order is (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6). Writing "s" for a six, "n" for a non-six, that would be "sssnn". But there are $\frac{5!}{3!2!}= 10$ different orders in which we can write "3 s's and 2 n's and each order has the same probability so there are 10(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6)= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.0321502[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif] approximately.

b) Exactly 4 sixes.
The probability of 4 sixes and 1 non-six in that order is (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6). Writing "s" for a six, "n" for a non-six, that would be "ssssn". But there are $\frac{5!}{4!1!}= 5$ different orders in which we can write "3 s's and 2 n's and each order has the same probability so there are 5(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.0032150
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]
approximately.

c) Exactly 5 sixes. That is, of course, (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)= 0.0001286, approximately.

Add those.

 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top