MHB Probability to realize string using subsequences

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the probability of reconstructing an original string from a set of given subsequences. Participants seek clarification on the requirements for the subsequences, including their lengths and structures, to optimize the probability of successfully realizing the original string. There is confusion regarding the definition of "probability of getting the original string," as some subsequences may not meet the necessary criteria. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the problem and the conditions under which the original string can be reconstructed. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in calculating this probability and the importance of precise definitions.
MonD1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Given a input string and 'n' random subsequences of that string , what is the probability of realizing original string using these subsequences correctly?

Example :

Given string = "MISSISSIPPI"
Subsequences:
1) "MISS"
2) "III"
3) "MIP"
4) "SIS"
5) "IS"
6 ) "SP"
7) "MP"How many subsequences will be required for optimal probability?
Is there any specific structure for subsequences for optimal probability?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: probability to realize string using subsequences

Can you post what you have tried or what your thoughts are on how to begin? This will give our helpers a better idea how best to help you. :D
 
Re: probability to realize string using subsequences

MarkFL said:
Can you post what you have tried or what your thoughts are on how to begin? This will give our helpers a better idea how best to help you. :D

Input
string of length 'm'
'k' subsequences of the string each of length 'n' (n <m)

What is the probability that by using these subsequences we can come up with the original string?
 
i still don't understand the question. post #1 doesn't appear to have substrings of the same length as you required in post #3.

Its also not clear what you mean by probablility of "getting the original string" from your substrings.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top