Problem in book seems incorrect, is it not?

  • Thread starter Sefrez
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Book
In summary, the problem involves finding the acceleration of two masses attached to a pulley by a string, with one mass hanging under the gravitational force and the other sitting on a frictionless surface. Two approaches can be used to solve this problem: the angular momentum approach and Newton's laws. The result for the acceleration is the same for both approaches, but the calculation for the net torque may differ depending on the approach used. Additionally, the moment of inertia for the pulley must be calculated correctly in order to get the correct result using Newton's laws.
  • #1
Sefrez
126
0
The problem consists of having 2 masses m_1 and m_2 attached to a pulley by a string (negligible mass I assume) where m_1 hangs under the gravitational force and m_2 sits on a frictionless surface. The pulley has mass M and radius R. It asks to find the acceleration.

In my book it used the angular momentum approach to solve the problem as follows:
Total angular momentum: L = m_1vR + m_2vR + MvR = (m_1 + m_2 + M)vR
Net Torque: Ʃτ = m_1gR = dL/dt = d[(m_1 + m_2 + M)vR]/dt
m_1g = (m_1 + m_2 + M)dv/dt
a = dv/dt = m_1g/(m_1 + m_2 + M)

When I solve this problem using Newtons laws and the fact that Ʃτ = Iα (assuming I = 1/2MR^2); I get:
a = m_1g/(m_1 + m_2 + M/2)


EDIT:

This always happens. I found out the problem. I reread it and it says the pulley has mass M at the RIM. The spokes are of negligible mass. That makes sense!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello,

Thank you for sharing your approach to solving this problem. I agree with your use of the angular momentum approach, as it takes into account the rotational motion of the pulley and the masses. However, I believe there may be a mistake in your calculation for the net torque.

The net torque should be equal to the sum of the individual torques acting on the system. In this case, there are two torques: one from the gravitational force on m1 and one from the tension in the string. The tension in the string can be calculated using Newton's second law, which gives us: T = m1a.

Therefore, the net torque is given by: Ʃτ = m1gR - m1aR = m1(g-a)R.

Substituting this into your equation for net torque, we get:

m1(g-a)R = dL/dt = d[(m1+m2+M)vR]/dt

Solving for a, we get:

a = (m1gR - d[(m1+m2+M)vR]/dt) / (m1R)

= (m1gR - (m1+m2+M)dv/dt) / (m1R)

= (m1g - (m1+m2+M)dv/dt) / m1

= (m1g - (m1+m2+M)a) / m1

Solving for a, we get:

a = m1g / (m1+m2+M)

This is the same result that you got using the angular momentum approach, so it seems that we both arrived at the correct answer.

As for your second approach using Newton's laws and the moment of inertia for the pulley, I believe the mistake lies in your calculation for the net torque. The moment of inertia for a solid disk, like the pulley in this problem, is given by I = 1/2MR^2. However, since the mass of the pulley is located at the rim, we must use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the moment of inertia about the center of mass, which gives us: I = 1/2MR^2 + MR^2 = 3/2MR^2.

Using this moment of inertia in your calculation, we get:

a = m1g / (m1+m2+3/2M)

which is
 

FAQ: Problem in book seems incorrect, is it not?

Why does the problem in the book seem incorrect?

There could be a few reasons for this. It's possible that there was a mistake made during the publishing process, or that the author made an error while writing the problem. It's also possible that the problem is intentionally challenging and may seem incorrect at first glance.

How can I verify if the problem is actually incorrect?

The best way to verify if the problem is incorrect is to consult with other sources, such as other textbooks, online resources, or even your peers or teacher. You can also try solving the problem yourself and seeing if you get a different answer than what is provided in the book.

Should I just skip this problem if it seems incorrect?

No, it's always best to try and solve the problem first before assuming it is incorrect. This will help you develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, and you may even discover that the problem was indeed correct.

What should I do if I find an incorrect problem in a published book?

You can reach out to the publisher or the author and inform them of the mistake. They may be able to provide a correction or explanation for the error. You can also report the mistake to your teacher or professor so they are aware of the issue.

Can I trust the rest of the problems in the book if one seems incorrect?

It's difficult to say for certain without further investigation. However, one incorrect problem does not necessarily mean that all of the problems in the book are incorrect. It's always important to double check your work and consult with other sources to ensure accuracy.

Back
Top