Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the recent changes to the company's policies and procedures. The employees expressed concerns about the new rules and how they would affect their day-to-day tasks. The manager reassured them that the changes were necessary for the company's growth and success. Overall, the conversation ended on a positive note with the employees understanding the reasons behind the changes and feeling more confident in the company's direction.
  • #1
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
915
0
Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem: Let $E$ be a real vector space with an inner product $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$. Show that any self-adjoint operator on $E$ can be diagonalized.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This week's problem was correctly answered by caffeinemachine. You can find his very detailed solution below.

[sp]Notation
Given an operator $T\in\mathcal L(V)$, where $V$ is a finite dimensional inner product space, we write $T^*$ to denote the adjoint of $T$.
We use $U^\perp$ to denote the orthogonal complement of a subspace $U$ of an inner product space $V$.Theorem
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional real vector space. Define set $U=V\times V$; addition on $U$ occurs component-wise.
For any member $a+ib$ of $\mathbb C$ and any member $(v,w)\in U$, define $(a+ib)(v,w)=(av-bw,aw+bv)$.
Then $U$ is a finite dimensional vector space over the complex number field.
Proof.
The fact that $U$ is a vector space over the field of complex numbers is routinely proved.
We show that $U$ is finite dimensional.
Let $\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\}$ be any basis of $V$.
Let $(u,v)$ be any vector in $U$.
Write $\displaystyle\frac{u+v}{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_jx_j$ and $\displaystyle\frac{v-u}{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}b_jx_j$.
Thus $\displaystyle u=\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_jx_j-\sum_{j=1}^{n}b_jx_j$ and $\displaystyle v=\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_jx_j+\sum_{j=1}^{n}b_jx_j$.
This shows that $\displaystyle (u,v)=\sum_{j=1}^{n}(a_j+ib_j)(x_j,x_j)$.
So we see that $\displaystyle \{(x_j,x_j)\}_{j=1}^n$ spans $U$.
Therefore $U$ is a finite dimensional vector space over $\mathbb C$.Theorem.
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional real vector space and $T$ be any operator on $V$.
Then there exists $\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb R$ such that $Tu=\lambda u-\mu v$ and $Tv=\lambda v + \mu u$ for some $u,v\in V$, at least one of which is a non-zero vector.
Proof.
Define a vector space $U=V\times V$ as done in the theorem above.
Now define $S:U\to U$ as $S(v,w)=(Tv,Tw)$.
It's easy to see that $S$ is a linear transformation.
Since $U$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space, $S$ has an eigenvalue.
Say $\lambda+\mu i$ is an eigenvalue of $S$.
Then there exists $(u,v)\neq(0,0)$ such that $S(u,v)=(\lambda+\mu i)(u,v)$.
This gives the desired result and we are done.

Definition .
An operator $T$ on $V$ is said to be self-adjoint if $T=T^*$.Theorem.
Every self-adjoint operator has an eigenvalue.
Proof.
Let $T$ be a self-adjoint operator on a vector space $V$.
If $V$ is a complex vector space then the theorem is true even without the hypothesis that $T$ is self-adjoint.
So we may assume that $V$ is a real vector space.
From the above theorem, we know that there exist vectors $u,v\in V$, not both zero, such that $Tu=\lambda u+\mu v$ and $Tv=-\mu u+\lambda v$, for some $\lambda,\mu\in \mathbb R$.
Now, by using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint, we can write $\langle{Tu,v}\rangle=\langle{u,Tv}\rangle$.
This gives $\langle{\lambda u+\mu v,v}\rangle=\langle{u,-\mu u+\lambda v}\rangle$.
Thus $\lambda\langle{u,v}\rangle+\mu|v|^2=-\mu|u|^2+\lambda\langle{u,v}\rangle$, from where we get $\mu(|u|^2+|v|^2)=0$.
This forces $\mu=0$ and hence $Tu=\lambda u$ and $Tv=\lambda v$. Since at least one of $u$ and $v$ is not zero, we conclude that $T$ has an eigenvalue.
Theorem.
Real Spectral Theorem. Let $T$ be a linear operator on a finite dimensional real inner-product space $V$.
Then $V$ has an orthonormal basis consisting only of eigenvectors if and only if $T$ is self-adjoint.
Proof.
One direction of the proof is trivial.
We do the proof in the other direction.
Suppose $T$ is self-adjoint over a finite dimensional real inner product space $V$.
We prove the theorem by induction on the dimension of $V$.
The base case, $\dim V=1$, is trivial.
Assume that $\dim V>1$ and that the theorem holds for all vector spaces of strictly smaller dimension.
We know that $T$ has an eigenvalue, say $\lambda$, and let $u$ be the corresponding eigenvector of norm $1$.
Let $U=\{au:a\in\mathbb R\}$ and write $S=T|_{U^\perp}$.
We now show that $U^\perp$ is invariant under $S$.
Let $v\in S$.
Now $\langle{u,Sv}\rangle=\langle{u,Tv}\rangle=\langle{Tu,v}\rangle=\lambda\langle{u,v}\rangle=0$ for all $u\in U$.
Thus $Sv\in U^\perp$.
Now we show that $S$ is self adjoint.
Let $v,w\in U^\perp$.
Now, $\langle{Sv,w}\rangle=\langle{Tv,w}\rangle=\langle{v,Tw}\rangle=\langle{v,Sw}\rangle$.
Thus $S$ is self-adjoint.
This provides us with the necessary tools to apply the induction hypothesis on $U^\perp$ as the dimension of $U^\perp$ is one less than the dimension of $V$.
Using induction, there is an orthonormal basis of $U^\perp$ consisting only of eigenvectors of $S$.
Since every eigenvector of $S$ is an eigenvector of $T$, adjoining $u$ to this orthonormal basis of $U^\perp$ given us an orthonormal basis of $V$ consisting only of eigenvectors and we are done.[/sp]
 

FAQ: Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014

What is the "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014"?

The "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014" is a weekly challenge presented by a group of scientists and mathematicians to stimulate critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

How do I participate in the "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014"?

To participate, simply visit the designated website or platform where the problem is posted and submit your solution before the deadline. Some challenges may also require you to show your work or provide a written explanation of your solution.

Is there a prize for solving the "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014"?

While there may not be a physical prize, the satisfaction of solving a challenging problem and the opportunity to learn from others' solutions can be considered a valuable reward.

Can I collaborate with others to solve the "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014"?

Yes, collaboration is encouraged as long as all contributors are acknowledged and the final solution is original and not copied from another source.

Are there any specific rules or guidelines for solving the "Problem of the Week #85 - January 13th, 2014"?

Each problem may have its own set of rules and guidelines, so it is important to read and follow them carefully. Generally, solutions should be well-explained, logical, and adhere to the principles of the scientific method.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top