Problem of the Week #96 - January 27th, 2014

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the benefits of incorporating mindfulness practices into daily life. The speakers highlighted how mindfulness can improve mental and physical well-being, reduce stress and anxiety, and enhance overall quality of life. They also shared personal experiences and tips for incorporating mindfulness into daily routines.
  • #1
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
915
0
Thanks again to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem: For $n\geq 0$, let $P_n(x)$ denote the Legendre polynomial. Show that
\[\int_{-1}^1 P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx = \begin{cases}0 & m\neq n\\ \dfrac{2}{2n+1} & m=n\end{cases}\]

-----

Hints for the $m\neq n$ case: [sp]Start with Legendre's differential equation \[(1-x^2)y^{\prime\prime} -2xy^{\prime}+\lambda(\lambda+1)y = 0\]
and rewrite it in the form
\[[(1-x^2)y^{\prime}]^{\prime} = -\lambda(\lambda+1)y.\tag{1}\] Then use the fact that $P_m(x)$ and $P_n(x)$ are solutions to this equation with $\lambda=m$ and $\lambda=n$ respectively, and substitute them into $(1)$. From there, find a way to combine these two equations in order to make $P_m(x)P_n(x)$ appear and then integrate to get the result.[/sp]Hints for the $m=n$ case: [sp]First find a way to combine the two recurrence relations (which follow from Bonnet's recurrence relation)
\[(n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x) = (2n+1)xP_n(x)\]
and
\[nP_n(x) + (n-1)P_{n-2}(x) = (2n-1)xP_{n-1}(x)\]
and then use the $m\neq n$ integral result to come up with a recurrence relation involving $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_n^2(x)\,dx$ and $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_{n-1}^2(x)\,dx$. Finally, use the fact that $P_0(x)=1$ and induction to show that $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_n^2(x)\,dx = \frac{2}{2n+1}$[/sp]

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This week's problem was correctly answered by MarkFL and chisigma (I have no idea why I didn't see that the first time). You can find Mark's solution below.

[sp]The first case - $m\ne n$:

Let's begin with Legendre's differential equation for $P_m(x)$ in the form:

\(\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]+m(m+1)P_m(x)=0\)

Multiplying through by \(\displaystyle P_n(x)\) and integrating with respect to $x$ using the given limits $-1$ and $1$, we obtain:

(1) \(\displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx+m(m+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

The first integral may be integrated using integration by parts, where:

\(\displaystyle u=P_n(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx\)

\(\displaystyle dv=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx\,\therefore\,v=\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\)

And so we may state:

\(\displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx=\left[P_n(x)\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]_{-1}^{1}-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx\)

We see that the first term on the right evaluates to zero, hence we are left with:

\(\displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx=-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx\)

Thus (1) becomes:

(2) \(\displaystyle -\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx+m(m+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

If we had begun with the Legendre differential equation for \(\displaystyle P_n(x)\) instead, and multiplied through by $P_m(x)$, and followed the sames steps as above, we would of course obtain:

(3) \(\displaystyle -\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx+n(n+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

Subtracting (3) from (2), there results:

\(\displaystyle \left(m(m+1)-n(n+1) \right)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

Now, if we observe that:

\(\displaystyle m(m+1)-n(n+1)=m^2+m-n^2-n=m^2+mn+m-mn-n^2-n=(m-n)(m+n+1)\)

we may now write

\(\displaystyle (m-n)(m+n+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

Since \(\displaystyle m\ne n\) and we must have \(\displaystyle m+n+1>0\) we may divide through by \(\displaystyle (m-n)(m+n+1)\) to obtain the desired result:

(4) \(\displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0\)

The second case - $m=n$:

Let's begin with the forms of Bonnet's recurrence relation:

\(\displaystyle nP_n(x)+(n-1)P_{n-2}(x)=(2n-1)xP_{n-1}(x)\)

\(\displaystyle (n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x)=(2n+1)xP_n(x)\)

Solving both for $x$, and equating the results, we obtain:

\(\displaystyle \frac{nP_n(x)+(n-1)P_{n-2}(x)}{(2n-1)P_{n-1}(x)}=\frac{(n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x)}{(2n+1)P_n(x)}\)

Cross-multiplication yields:

\(\displaystyle n(2n+1)P_n^2(x)+(n-1)(2n+1)P_{n-2}(x)P_n(x)=(n+1)(2n-1)P_{n-1}P_{n+1}(x)+n(2n-1)P_{n-1}^2(x)\)

Integrating with respect to $x$, and using the result in (4), we obtain after dividing through by \(\displaystyle 1\le n\):

(5) \(\displaystyle (2n+1)\int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx=(2n-1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_{n-1}^2(x)\,dx\)

Now, let's define:

\(\displaystyle A_{n}\equiv \int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx\)

Thus, with this definition, (5) may be expressed as the recursion:

(6) \(\displaystyle A_{n}=\frac{2n-1}{2n+1}A_{n-1}\)

Using the fact that \(\displaystyle P_0(x)=1\), we obtain:

\(\displaystyle A_{0}= \int_{-1}^{1} \,dx=2\)

Hence, we find the following:

\(\displaystyle A_{1}=\frac{1}{3}\cdot2=\frac{2}{3}=\frac{2}{2(1)+1}\)

\(\displaystyle A_{2}=\frac{3}{5}\cdot\frac{2}{3}=\frac{2}{5}= \frac{2}{2(2)+1}\)

Thus, based on the developing pattern, we may state the following induction hypothesis $P_{n}$ (having already shown the base case $P_1$ is true):

\(\displaystyle A_{n}=\frac{2}{2n+1}\)

Now, the recursion we found in (6) may be written with $n+1$ instead of $n$ as:

(7) \(\displaystyle A_{n+1}=\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}A_{n}\)

Thus, as our induction step, we may multiply through the induction hypothesis $P_{n}$ by \(\displaystyle \frac{2n+1}{2n+3}\) to obtain:

\(\displaystyle \frac{2n+1}{2n+3}A_{n}=\frac{2}{2n+1}\cdot\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}\)

Using (7) on the left side, and simplifying the right side, there results:

\(\displaystyle A_{n+1}=\frac{2}{2(n+1)+1}\)

We have derived $P_{n+1}$ from $P_{n}$, thereby completing the proof by induction. Thus, we may state:

(8) \(\displaystyle A_n=\int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx=\frac{2}{2n+1}\)

Combining the two cases:

Combining our two cases, $m\ne n$ with (4) and $m=n$ with (8), we may now state:

(9) \(\displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=\begin{cases}0 & m\neq n\\ \dfrac{2}{2n+1} & m=n\end{cases}\) [/sp]
 

FAQ: Problem of the Week #96 - January 27th, 2014

What is the "Problem of the Week #96 - January 27th, 2014" about?

The "Problem of the Week #96 - January 27th, 2014" is a scientific problem that was posed on January 27th, 2014 and is the 96th problem in a weekly series. It is a challenge for scientists and mathematicians to solve and often involves a complex question or scenario.

How is the "Problem of the Week" chosen?

The "Problem of the Week" is chosen by a team of scientists and mathematicians who carefully select a challenging and thought-provoking problem for each week. They may also take suggestions from the scientific community for future problems.

Is there a prize for solving the "Problem of the Week"?

Yes, there is often a prize for solving the "Problem of the Week". This could be a cash prize, a certificate of recognition, or other rewards depending on the organization or individual who poses the problem.

Can anyone participate in solving the "Problem of the Week"?

Yes, anyone with a background in science or mathematics is welcome to participate in solving the "Problem of the Week". It is a great opportunity for students, researchers, and professionals to challenge themselves and showcase their problem-solving skills.

Are the solutions to the "Problem of the Week" published?

Yes, the solutions to the "Problem of the Week" are typically published after the deadline for submissions has passed. This allows for others to learn from the solution and see the different approaches that were taken to solve the problem.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top