Problem with Doppler Broadening

In summary, Doppler broadening is a phenomenon caused by the Doppler effect where the spectral lines of atoms or molecules appear wider than expected due to the movement of the light source. It is caused by the random thermal motion of particles and can make it difficult to accurately measure spectral lines in spectroscopy. However, it can be corrected for using techniques such as calibration with a reference gas or Fourier transform spectroscopy. Doppler broadening has various applications in science, such as studying temperature and density of gases, analyzing the composition of astronomical bodies, and in medical imaging techniques.
  • #1
EliotHijano
18
0
Hello,
I would like to know how to calculate the broadening of the spectral lines caused by the Doppler effect for the Lyman, Balmer and Paschen series. To be more concrete, I would like to know the broadening of the alpha transitions.
The equations I use are the following but i don't know if I am doing something wrong.

[tex]\Delta \nu &=&2\frac{\nu _{o}}{c}\sqrt{\frac{2KT}{m}\ln \left( 2\right) }[/tex]

I calculate [tex]\nu _{o}[/tex] Doing the following:

[tex]E_{n}-E_{n^{\prime }} &=&\left[ \frac{1}{\left( n^{\prime }\right) ^{2}}-
\frac{1}{\left( n\right) ^{2}}\right] \frac{Z^{2}e^{4}\mu }{2\left( 4\pi
\varepsilon _{o}\right) ^{2}\hbar ^{2}}=-h\nu _{o}[/tex]

[tex]\nu _{o} &=&-\frac{Z^{2}e^{4}\mu }{4\pi \left( 4\pi \varepsilon _{o}\right)
^{2}\hbar ^{3}}\left[ \frac{1}{\left( n^{\prime }\right) ^{2}}-\frac{1}{
\left( n\right) ^{2}}\right][/tex]

For T=300K we have:

[tex]\nu _{o} &\approx &-\frac{e^{4}m_{e}}{4\pi \left( 4\pi \varepsilon
_{o}\right) ^{2}\hbar ^{3}}\left[ \frac{1}{\left( n^{\prime }\right) ^{2}}-
\frac{1}{\left( n\right) ^{2}}\right] \approx -3.288953357\cdot 10^{15}\left[
\frac{1}{\left( n^{\prime }\right) ^{2}}-\frac{1}{\left( n\right) ^{2}}
\right] \ \ Hz[/tex]

SO:

[tex]\Delta \nu &=&2\frac{\nu _{o}}{c}\sqrt{\frac{2KT}{m}\ln \left( 2\right) }
\approx -0.000040625\cdot 10^{15}\left[ \frac{1}{\left( n^{\prime }\right)
^{2}}-\frac{1}{\left( n\right) ^{2}}\right] \ \ Hz[/tex]

Finally, the following numbers are obtained:
[tex]\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
\hline
$Line$ & $\Delta \nu \ (GHz)$ \\ \hline\hline
$\alpha \ LYMAN$ & $ 30.4685$ \\ \hline
$\alpha \ BALMER$ & $ 5.64236$ \\ \hline
$\alpha \ PASCHEN$ & $ 1.974826$ \\ \hline
\end{tabular}[/tex]

Unfortunatelly, I can't find any book to confirm this results, that is why I am posting this.
What do you say? Am I doing anything wrong?

Eliot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello Eliot,

Thank you for your question. Your calculations and equations seem to be correct, but there are a few things to consider when calculating the broadening of spectral lines caused by the Doppler effect for the Lyman, Balmer, and Paschen series. First, it is important to note that the Doppler effect causes a broadening of spectral lines due to the thermal motion of particles, resulting in a spread of frequencies around the central line. This effect is more prominent at higher temperatures, so your calculations for T=300K may not accurately reflect the broadening at other temperatures. Additionally, the equation you are using assumes that the particles are moving in a random direction, which may not be the case for all particles in a gas. Other factors such as collisions and magnetic fields can also contribute to the broadening of spectral lines.

To confirm your results, I would recommend consulting a textbook or research paper on atomic and molecular spectroscopy. These sources often provide more detailed equations and methods for calculating spectral line broadening. Additionally, there are computer programs and online calculators available that can help you accurately determine the broadening of spectral lines for different series and transitions.

Overall, it seems that your calculations are on the right track, but to confirm your results and account for other factors that may affect the broadening of spectral lines, I would suggest consulting additional resources and using more precise methods of calculation. I hope this helps and good luck with your research!
 
  • #3


Hello Eliot,

Thank you for your question and for sharing your calculations. Your approach to calculating the Doppler broadening of spectral lines is correct. However, there are a few things to consider when using this equation.

Firstly, the equation you are using assumes that the particles (atoms or molecules) are moving at a thermal velocity, meaning that they have a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of velocities. This may not always be the case, as there may be other factors affecting the motion of the particles, such as external forces or interactions with other particles. Therefore, the calculated broadening may not be entirely accurate in all situations.

Secondly, the equation assumes that the particles have a uniform distribution of velocities, which may not be the case for all particles in a gas. For example, in a gas that is undergoing turbulence or in a plasma, there may be a range of velocities that are not evenly distributed. In these cases, the Doppler broadening may be different from what is calculated using this equation.

Lastly, the equation only takes into account thermal motion and does not consider other broadening mechanisms such as pressure broadening or natural broadening. These effects can also contribute to the broadening of spectral lines and may need to be considered in certain situations.

In summary, your approach to calculating the Doppler broadening is correct, but there may be other factors to consider in order to accurately determine the broadening of spectral lines in specific situations. I would recommend consulting additional resources or seeking the advice of a colleague or expert in the field to confirm your results.
 

Related to Problem with Doppler Broadening

1. What is Doppler broadening and how does it affect spectral lines?

Doppler broadening is a phenomenon where the spectral lines of an atom or molecule appear wider than expected due to the Doppler effect. This effect occurs when the source of light is moving towards or away from the observer, causing a shift in the wavelength of the emitted light. This results in a broadening of the spectral lines, making them less distinct and harder to analyze.

2. What causes Doppler broadening?

Doppler broadening is caused by the random thermal motion of atoms or molecules. As they move towards or away from the observer, the emitted light will be shifted in wavelength, leading to a broadening of the spectral lines. This effect is more pronounced at higher temperatures, where the particles have higher velocities.

3. How does Doppler broadening affect spectroscopy?

Doppler broadening can cause issues in spectroscopy as it makes it more difficult to accurately measure the wavelengths of spectral lines. In some cases, it may even lead to the blending of different spectral lines, making it challenging to identify the elements or molecules present in a sample. This effect is especially problematic in high-temperature environments, such as stars, where Doppler broadening can be significant.

4. Can Doppler broadening be corrected for in spectroscopy?

Yes, there are techniques that can correct for Doppler broadening in spectroscopy. One method is to use a reference gas with known spectral lines to calibrate the instrument and account for any broadening effects. Another approach is to use a technique called Fourier transform spectroscopy, which can separate the broadened spectral lines and provide more accurate measurements.

5. What are some applications of Doppler broadening in science?

Doppler broadening has various applications in science, including studying the temperature and density of gases, identifying the composition of stars and other astronomical bodies, and analyzing the properties of materials using spectroscopy. It is also used in medical imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET), to measure the motion of particles in the body.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
612
Replies
2
Views
671
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
856
Replies
1
Views
956
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
603
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top