Problems with acceleration due to gravity, and terminal speed

In summary, we have a conversation about two physics questions. The first question involves finding the velocity and height of a ball thrown vertically by a pitcher. There is a discrepancy between the answer given in the book and the answer calculated by the asker. The second question is about the chances of survival in a fall from a great height and how to maximize the deceleration distance upon landing. The asker also asks for references for a well-documented case of someone surviving a fall from a great height.
  • #1
Byrgg
335
0
My first question:

1. A baseball pitcher throws a ball vertically upward and catches it at the same level 4.2s later.

a) With what velocity did the pitcher throw the ball?
b) How high did the ball rise?

(my work, which is wrong according to the book)

a)

[itex]v_2 = v_1 + (a)\Delta(t)
= 0m/s - (-9.80m/s^2)(4.2s)
= 41m/s [up][/itex]

The book says it's 21m/s [up], but I don't really see why, so could someone please tell me what I did wrong, or if I'm actually correct, while the book is wrong(the books have been wrong several times before).

b)

I haven't started this yet, because I think I need the initial veolocity in order to calculate the displacement. Would I be correct to use this equation?

[itex]\Delta(d) = v_1\Delta(t) + 1/2a\Delta(t)^2[/itex]

Now for my second question:

There are many well-documented cases of people falling from tremendous heights without parachutes and surviving. The record is held by a Russian who fell from an astounding 7500m. The chances of survival depend on the "deceleration distance" at the time of landing. Why is a fall from a height of 7500m no motr dangerous than one from half that height? How can the deceleration distance upon landing be maxized?

I think I got the first part, because of terminal speed, there wouldn't be a difference in between the two speeds acheived from the falls(assuming the fall from half that height achieves terminal speed). But the second part has me stuck, the question doesn't really explain what the deceleration distance is, so I don't know how to maximize it, or much about it all, for that matter.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
a) x= -(9.8/2)t2+ v0t. If x= 0, t= 0 is one solution. You are told that the other is 4.2 s. What is v0.

b) v(t)= -9.8t+ v0. The ball will continue to go up as long as the velocity> 0. It will be descending when the velocity< 0. The maximum occurs when v= 0. What value of t makes that true?
 
  • #3
Byrgg said:
There are many well-documented cases of people falling from tremendous heights without parachutes and surviving. The record is held by a Russian who fell from an astounding 7500m.
So do you have any references for this well documented case?
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
a) x= -(9.8/2)t2+ v0t. If x= 0, t= 0 is one solution. You are told that the other is 4.2 s. What is v0.

b) v(t)= -9.8t+ v0. The ball will continue to go up as long as the velocity> 0. It will be descending when the velocity< 0. The maximum occurs when v= 0. What value of t makes that true?

For a), I don't really know what you mean, do I sub in 4.2 for t, and then solve for vo? if so, what value of x do I use, zero?

For b), I'm not really sure what you mean here, either, what's vo here?

MeJennifer said:
So do you have any references for this well documented case?

No, I just typed up the question word for word.
 
  • #5
Could someone please give me some more help with this?
 
  • #6
Byrgg said:
My first question:

1. A baseball pitcher throws a ball vertically upward and catches it at the same level 4.2s later.

a) With what velocity did the pitcher throw the ball?
b) How high did the ball rise?

(my work, which is wrong according to the book)

a)

[itex]v_2 = v_1 + (a)\Delta(t)
= 0m/s - (-9.80m/s^2)(4.2s)
= 41m/s [up][/itex]

The book says it's 21m/s [up], but I don't really see why, so could someone please tell me what I did wrong, or if I'm actually correct, while the book is wrong(the books have been wrong several times before).
Your error is in using t = 4.2s. If it returns to his hand in 4.2s, how much time did it take to reach the highest point? (Using the right time, your work would be correct. You are mixing up v_1 and v_2 and signs a bit.)

If you wish to use t = 4.2s, then realize that v_1 = - v_2.

b)

I haven't started this yet, because I think I need the initial veolocity in order to calculate the displacement. Would I be correct to use this equation?

[itex]\Delta(d) = v_1\Delta(t) + 1/2a\Delta(t)^2[/itex]
That equation will work fine. (You don't really need the initial speed if you start at the top of the motion.)
 
  • #7
Ok then, so what time do I use? Would I assume that the trip took half the time for the way up?

Also, I was wondering something about this:

Doc Al said:
If you wish to use t = 4.2s, then realize that v_1 = - v_2.

Why would I use 4.2s at all, if it's not the correct time?
 
  • #8
Byrgg said:
Ok then, so what time do I use? Would I assume that the trip took half the time for the way up?
Yes. It spends the same amount of time rising as falling.

Also, I was wondering something about this:



Why would I use 4.2s at all, if it's not the correct time?
That is the correct time, for the entire "trip" of the ball. If you want to consider just half the trip, then use half the time. If you want to consider the entire trip, use the entire time. Depending upon what you are solving for, sometimes either way will work, sometimes you must use one or the other.

If you analyze just half of the trip, then:
v_1 = ?
v_2 = 0
v_2 = v_1 + at (t = 4.2s/2)

If you analyze the full trip, then:
v_1 = ?
v_2 = - v_1 (when it comes down it's going at the same speed in the opposite direction)
v_2 = v_1 + at (t = 4.2s)
 
  • #9
How do you know that the trip took the same amount of time both ways? This is probably pretty straight forward, I think I'm just forgetting something.
 
  • #10
By symmetry: The trip down is the reverse of the trip up.
 
  • #11
Symmetry? Is this related to the parabolic path the projectile follows?
 
  • #12
Yes, the parabolic path is symmetric for the same reason.

More simply, I mean this: Toss a ball in the air. Whatever vertical speed it has going up, it will have that same speed going down when it reaches the same point from the top.
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
More simply, I mean this: Toss a ball in the air. Whatever vertical speed it has going up, it will have that same speed going down when it reaches the same point from the top.

But why exactly do you know this? I'd think that in order for you to know this, you'd need to know either the time of the trip down, or the final velocity downwards, or can on of these be estimated from a graph, or by some other means?
 
  • #14
All you need to know are the equations of motion. For example: The vertical speed is described by V = V0 + at. Let's call t = 0 to be the time when the ball is at the top of its motion, thus V0 = 0 and V = at. So, one second before it reaches the top (t = -1), the speed is V = +9.8 m/s^2; one second after it reaches the top (t = +1), the speed is V = -9.8 m/s^2.

Position works the same way. The vertical position (with t = 0 & y = 0 at the top) is given by: y = 0.5at^2. So at t = -1 & t = +1 the position is the same: y = -4.9 m.
 

Related to Problems with acceleration due to gravity, and terminal speed

1. What is acceleration due to gravity?

Acceleration due to gravity is the acceleration that an object experiences when falling towards the Earth. It is a constant value of 9.8 meters per second squared (m/s²) near the Earth's surface.

2. How does mass affect acceleration due to gravity?

Mass does not affect acceleration due to gravity. All objects, regardless of their mass, will experience the same acceleration due to gravity near the Earth's surface.

3. What is terminal speed?

Terminal speed is the maximum speed that an object can reach when falling through a fluid, such as air or water. It occurs when the force of air resistance is equal to the force of gravity, resulting in a constant speed.

4. How does terminal speed relate to acceleration due to gravity?

Terminal speed is affected by acceleration due to gravity in the sense that a higher acceleration due to gravity will result in a higher terminal speed. However, the two are not directly proportional and can be affected by other factors, such as air resistance and mass.

5. Can terminal speed be reached in a vacuum?

No, terminal speed can only be reached when there is a force opposing the object's motion, such as air resistance. In a vacuum, there is no such force, so objects will continue to accelerate until they reach the speed of light.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
844
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
557
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
948
Back
Top