Proof about 2 numbers being relatively prime.

In summary, the author was trying to prove that there are an infinite amount of primes by observing that in the series 2^2+1, 2^{2^2}+1,2^{2^3}+1,2^{2^4}+1,... every 2 numbers are relatively prime. They were not able to come up with a proof that works. However, if you can prove that the recursion relation F(n)=F(n-1)F(n-2)...F(1)F(0)+2, you are pretty much home free.
  • #1
cragar
2,552
3

Homework Statement


Prove that their are an infinite amount of primes by observing that in the series
[itex] 2^2+1, 2^{2^2}+1,2^{2^3}+1,2^{2^4}+1,... [/itex]
every 2 numbers are relatively prime.

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to take 2 of the numbers in the series and look at their difference because if they have common factors then it should divide their difference, but then I am not sure how this will work.
or maybe I should look at these numbers mod2 or something, well I guess mod2 these all equal 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
cragar said:
I was going to take 2 of the numbers in the series and look at their difference
Seems a good start. Suppose p divides each, so it divide the difference. Can you then discard a factor of the difference and deduce that p divides the remaining factor?
 
  • #3
If I look at [itex] 2^4+1-(2^2+1)=2^4-2^2=2^2(2^2-1) [/itex] we know that
[itex] 2^2+1 [/itex] and [itex]2^2-1 [/itex] are relatively prime because they are an odd number separated by a power of 2. But then I was trying to generalize this proof. where we have
[itex] 2^x+1,2^y+1 [/itex] x<y then [itex] 2^y+1-2^x-1=2^x(2^{y-x}-1 [/itex] I guess I could make a similar argument that [itex] 2^{y-x}-1 [/itex] and [itex] 2^x+1 [/itex] are relatively prime.
 
  • #4
cragar said:
[itex] 2^y+1-2^x-1=2^x(2^{y-x}-1 [/itex] I guess I could make a similar argument that [itex] 2^{y-x}-1 [/itex] and [itex] 2^x+1 [/itex] are relatively prime.
I don't think that argument will work.
As I said, suppose p divides 22x+1 and 22y+1, so it follows that p divides 22y-2x-1. Can you now construct more numbers it must divide?
 
  • #5
These numbers are called Fermat numbers. Define F(n)=2^(2^n)+1. Then if you can show the recursion relation F(n)=F(n-1)F(n-2)...F(1)F(0)+2, you are pretty much home free. Try concentrating on proving that. That's the usual route. Start by writing down the most obvious relation between F(n) and F(n-1) that you can think of.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Proof about 2 numbers being relatively prime.

What is the definition of "relatively prime" numbers?

Two numbers are considered relatively prime if they have no common factors other than 1.

How do you prove that two numbers are relatively prime?

To prove that two numbers are relatively prime, you can use the Euclidean algorithm to find the greatest common divisor of the two numbers. If the greatest common divisor is 1, then the numbers are relatively prime.

What is the significance of relatively prime numbers?

Relatively prime numbers are important in number theory and cryptography. They are used in encryption and decryption algorithms, and they also have applications in prime factorization and modular arithmetic.

Can more than two numbers be relatively prime?

Yes, any set of numbers can be relatively prime as long as they have no common factors other than 1. For example, the numbers 7, 11, and 19 are relatively prime.

Is there a formula for determining if two numbers are relatively prime?

No, there is no formula for determining if two numbers are relatively prime. However, there are efficient algorithms, such as the Euclidean algorithm, that can be used to find the greatest common divisor and determine if two numbers are relatively prime.

Back
Top