Proof By Induction (difficult problem)

In summary, the conversation was about using mathematical induction to prove the divisibility of (x+1)^n - nx - 1 by x^2 for integer n greater than or equal to 2. The individual was stuck on the proof for n = k + 1 and needed assistance in completing it.
  • #1
Dish
2
0
Hey guys, I'm just totally stumped by this Q

Use mathematical induction to prove that for integer n, n > or = to 2,
(x+1)^n - nx - 1 is divisible by x^2.

It's not a Homework problem.

Attempt at solution:

1) Prove for n =2,
(x+1)^2 - 2x - 1 = x^2 + 2x +1 - 2x -1 = x^2
2) Assume true for n = k
thus (x+1)^k -kx -1 = m x^2 where m is any integer
3) Prove for n = k+1

(x+1)^(k+1) - (k+1)x - 1
(x+1)^k . (x+1) - kx - x - 1
(x+1)^k - kx -1 + x(x+1)^k - x - 1
m.x^2 + x(x+1)^k - x -1

from here on i am totally confused. :S
Please can someone help me to finish the proof, so that it's divisible by x^2?
Thank you :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dish said:
Hey guys, I'm just totally stumped by this Q

Use mathematical induction to prove that for integer n, n > or = to 2,
(x+1)^n - nx - 1 is divisible by x^2.

It's not a Homework problem.

Attempt at solution:

1) Prove for n =2,
(x+1)^2 - 2x - 1 = x^2 + 2x +1 - 2x -1 = x^2
2) Assume true for n = k
thus (x+1)^k -kx -1 = m x^2 where m is any integer
3) Prove for n = k+1

(x+1)^(k+1) - (k+1)x - 1
(x+1)^k . (x+1) - kx - x - 1
(x+1)^k - kx -1 + x(x+1)^k - x - 1
m.x^2 + x(x+1)^k - x -1

At the bold line, you can factor out (x+1) from some of the terms so that you have [itex](x+1)(\mbox{something})+(\mbox{something else})[/itex]. Look at the "something" carefully & think how you can relate it to your kth step. Plugging that relation in for the "something", you should be able to then expand things and get the result of x^2*(stuff).

By the way, your assumption that at the kth step (x+1)^k -kx - 1 = mx^2, where m is an integer, is incorrect. m can be a polynomial in x.
 
  • #3
argh Thanks I get it now, thanks for the help
 

FAQ: Proof By Induction (difficult problem)

1. What is the concept of proof by induction?

Proof by induction is a mathematical technique used to prove that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It involves breaking down a problem into smaller parts and proving that the statement holds for each part, eventually leading to the proof that it holds for all natural numbers.

2. How is proof by induction different from other proof techniques?

Proof by induction is different from other proof techniques because it relies on the principle of mathematical induction, which states that if a statement holds for a base case and can be proven to hold for the next case assuming it holds for the previous case, then it holds for all cases. This allows for the proof of statements that hold for infinitely many cases.

3. What is the general process for using proof by induction?

The general process for using proof by induction involves three steps: 1) Prove the statement holds for a base case (usually n=1 or n=0). 2) Assume the statement holds for an arbitrary case, usually n=k. 3) Use this assumption to prove that the statement also holds for the next case, n=k+1. This completes the proof by showing the statement holds for all natural numbers starting from the base case.

4. What are some common mistakes to avoid when using proof by induction?

Some common mistakes to avoid when using proof by induction include: 1) Assuming the statement holds for n=k without first proving it for the base case. 2) Proving the statement for n=k+1 without using the assumption that it holds for n=k. 3) Assuming the statement holds for n=k+1 without first proving it for n=k. 4) Using incorrect algebraic manipulations or logical reasoning in the proof. 5) Not clearly stating the base case and the induction hypothesis.

5. How can proof by induction be applied to difficult problems?

Proof by induction can be applied to difficult problems by breaking them down into smaller parts and using the principle of mathematical induction to prove that the statement holds for all cases. This allows for the proof of statements that may not be easily proven using other techniques. It is also important to carefully state the base case and the induction hypothesis, and to check for any mistakes in the proof before concluding that the statement holds for all natural numbers.

Similar threads

Back
Top