Proof d/dx e^x=e^x using substitution

In summary: Yeah, the limit you said you are getting is the one I wrote in #6. So instead of saying, "I'm getting 1", you should say "I'm getting what you said in post #6" as I didn't write out the limit expression in post #6.OK THANKS!In summary, the conversation involves finding a proof for the derivative of e^x in the form of a limit substitution. The key is to use the fact that e=limit (1+1/h)^h as h approaches infinity. By setting u=e^h-1 and substituting it into the limit expression, it can be shown that the limit as δ approaches 0 of (e^δ-1)/δ
  • #1
Jkohn
31
0

Homework Statement


Proof d/dx e^x=e^x, use e=limit (1+1/h)^h h->infinity

Show how that implies d/dx e^x=e^x

t

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Ive tried using chain rule--wasnt accepted
Also, I did e=(1+h)^[1/h]-->e^h=1+h, then reduced to e^x, still didnt accept

How can I prove it using limit substitution? He told me to google finding limits by substitution then he said e^h-1=U
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So have you tried taking the derivative of ex in the limit form?

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=\frac{d}{dx}\lim_{h\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{hx}[/tex]
 
  • #3
Mentallic said:
So have you tried taking the derivative of ex in the limit form?

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=\frac{d}{dx}\lim_{h\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{hx}[/tex]

Ive attempted, but its a limit inside a limit?
 
  • #4
Jkohn said:
Ive attempted, but its a limit inside a limit?

Aren't you allowed to use the derivative rules? [tex]\frac{d}{dx}a^{cx}=c\ln(a)a^{cx}[/tex]
 
  • #5
Mentallic said:
Aren't you allowed to use the derivative rules? [tex]\frac{d}{dx}a^{cx}=c\ln(a)a^{cx}[/tex]

Exactly what i did when he first said, its obvious, but he wants mathematical reasoning using limits..
 
  • #6
[tex](e^x)'=\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{x+\delta}-e^{x}}{\delta}=e^{x}\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}[/tex]
Now you want to show
[tex]\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}=1[/tex]
And you are given that
[tex]\lim_{h\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{h}=e[/tex]
That's very close. Don't forget the hint you are given: letting u=e^h-1.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Jkohn said:
Exactly what i did when he first said, its obvious, but he wants mathematical reasoning using limits..

Hmm... ok...

Can you clarify what he meant by e^h-1=U?

What about if we tried to just go back to the basics. So we'll use any positive number a,

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}a^x=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^{x+h}-a^x}{h}[/tex]

[tex]=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^xa^h-a^x}{h}[/tex]

[tex]=a^x\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}[/tex]

Now, we're interested in the case where the limit is equal to 1,

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}=1[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}a^h-1=\lim_{h\to 0} h[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}a^h =\lim_{h\to 0}1+h[/tex]

Can you see where this is heading?

edit: klondike beat me to it.
 
  • #8
Mentallic said:
Now, we're interested in the case where the limit is equal to 1,
[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}=1[/tex]
uh-oh, this doesn't sound right.
 
  • #9
Mentallic said:
Hmm... ok...

Can you clarify what he meant by e^h-1=U?

What about if we tried to just go back to the basics. So we'll use any positive number a,

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}a^x=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^{x+h}-a^x}{h}[/tex]

[tex]=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^xa^h-a^x}{h}[/tex]

[tex]=a^x\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}[/tex]

Now, we're interested in the case where the limit is equal to 1,

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}=1[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}a^h-1=\lim_{h\to 0} h[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}a^h =\lim_{h\to 0}1+h[/tex]

Can you see where this is heading?

edit: klondike beat me to it.

Put that in my "attempts" he says that e^h ≠ (1+h) because its a ≈ and not =, I even told him under a certain domain "its true" he won't accept lol..
 
  • #10
klondike said:
[tex](e^x)'=\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{x+\delta}-e^{x}}{\delta}=e^{x}\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}[/tex]
Now you want to show
[tex]\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}=1[/tex]
And you are given that
[tex]\lim_{h\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{h}=e[/tex]
That's very close. Don't forget the hint you are given: letting u=e^h-1.

So what exactly should I be substituting??
 
  • #11
klondike said:
uh-oh, this doesn't sound right.

Actually, yeah, you're right. We should be starting off with the limit expression for e.
 
  • #12
let [tex]\frac{1}{h}=e^{\delta}-1 \quad;; h\to \infty \quad as \quad \delta \to 0[/tex] then write δ in terms of h, and plug them back in, and you are all set.

Jkohn said:
So what exactly should I be substituting??
 
Last edited:
  • #13
klondike said:
[tex](e^x)'=\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{x+\delta}-e^{x}}{\delta}=e^{x}\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}[/tex]
Now you want to show
[tex]\lim_{\delta\to 0}\dfrac{e^{\delta}-1}{\delta}=1[/tex]
And you are given that
[tex]\lim_{h\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{h}=e[/tex]
That's very close. Don't forget the hint you are given: letting u=e^h-1.

klondike said:
let [tex]\frac{1}{h}=e^{\delta}-1 \quad;; h\to \infty \quad as \quad \delta \to 0[/tex] then write δ in terms of h, and plug them back in, and you are all set.

Im a bit confused here. Where are you getting the (1/h)=e^δ−1 from?
 
  • #14
Because e^δ−1 goes zero as δ goes zero. You want some quantity goes zero as something goes zero or, more conveniently as something goes infinity as you are given a known limit as its independent variable goes infinity.

Hence, it's mostly conveniently to set the quantity to 1/h as h approach infinity. It satisfies both condition and closely resemble what you are given.
You can, of course first set y=e^δ−1 as well.
Jkohn said:
Im a bit confused here. Where are you getting the (1/h)=e^δ−1 from?
 
  • #15
how do I put δ in terms of h..where am I plugging it in??
EDIT: SORRY I realized h=1/(e^δ - 1)

do I insert that h into the e= limit (1+ 1/h)^h ??

thanks
 
  • #16
[tex]e^{\delta}-1=\frac{1}{h}[/tex]
[tex]\delta=ln(1+\frac{1}{h})[/tex]
And put these 2 into it. And recall that aln(x)=ln(x^a). I'm sure you will figure it out.
 
  • #17
mhm I am doing this:

lim e^δ−1/ δ =1

e^δ - 1= 1/h
δ=ln(1+ 1/h)

so I get: limit [(1/h)]/ [ln(1+(1/h))] h-->infinity

Im getting 1
 
  • #18
Now go back to check post #6. Isn't that what you're trying to prove?

Jkohn said:
mhm I am doing this:

lim e^δ−1/ δ =1

e^δ - 1= 1/h
δ=ln(1+ 1/h)

so I get: limit [(1/h)]/ [ln(1+(1/h))] h-->infinity

Im getting 1
 
  • #19
ohhhhhh so 1=e^x holy ****!
 
  • #20
well 1 implies it..wow so cool
 

FAQ: Proof d/dx e^x=e^x using substitution

What is the proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution?

The proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution is a mathematical process used to show that the derivative of the exponential function e^x is equal to the function itself. This proof involves substituting the variable x with a new variable u, and using the chain rule to find the derivative of e^u. By rearranging the equation, it can be shown that the derivative of e^x is equal to e^x.

How do you use substitution to prove d/dx e^x = e^x?

To prove d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution, we start by substituting x with a new variable u. This means that e^x becomes e^u. We then use the chain rule to find the derivative of e^u, which is e^u. By rearranging the equation, we can see that the derivative of e^x is equal to e^x, proving the statement.

Why is substitution used in this proof?

Substitution is used in this proof because it allows us to simplify the equation and make it easier to find the derivative. By substituting x with a new variable u, we can use the chain rule to find the derivative of e^u, which can then be rearranged to show that the derivative of e^x is equal to e^x.

Can the proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution be applied to other exponential functions?

Yes, the proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution can be applied to any exponential function of the form a^x, where a is a constant. By substituting x with a new variable u, and using the chain rule, we can show that the derivative of a^x is equal to a^x.

How is the proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution related to the properties of the exponential function?

The proof d/dx e^x = e^x using substitution is related to the properties of the exponential function because it shows that the derivative of e^x is equal to the function itself. This is one of the fundamental properties of the exponential function, which states that the slope of the tangent line to the function at any point is equal to the value of the function at that point.

Back
Top