Proof: G/H1 is Isomorphic to H2/K for G with Normal Subgroups H1 and H2

In summary: After realizing that G/H1 being simple implies that H1 is the largest proper normal subgroup, I was able to set up a homomorphism with K as the kernel. This ultimately led to showing that G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K. In summary, we can conclude that if G is a group with normal subgroups H1 and H2, where H2 is not a subset of H1, and G/H1 is simple, then G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K, where K is the intersection of H1 and H2.
  • #1
Poirot1
245
0
Let
G be a group with normal subgroups H1 and H2 with H2 not a subset of H1. Let K = H1 intersect H2.


Show that if G/H1 is simple, then G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K.


My first thought was to set up a homomorphism with K as the kernel but soon realized that the fact that H2 was not normal is H1 scuppered this tactic. G/H1 being simple implies that H1 is the largest proper normal subgroup but where to go from there?




 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just realized that my last sentence is incorrect. G/H1 being simple means there is no normal subgroup A of G which H1 is normal in.
 
  • #3
The quotient map $\pi:G\to G/H_1$ maps $H_2$ to a normal subgroup of $G/H_1$. This normal subgroup contains more than just the identity element, so by simplicity it must be the whole of $G/H_1$. Now show that the kernel of the homomorphism $\pi|_{H_2}$ is equal to $K$.
 
  • #4
Opalg said:
The quotient map $\pi:G\to G/H_1$ maps $H_2$ to a normal subgroup of $G/H_1$. This normal subgroup contains more than just the identity element, so by simplicity it must be the whole of $G/H_1$. Now show that the kernel of the homomorphism $\pi|_{H_2}$ is equal to $K$.

Ah, my first ideas were correct.
 
  • #5


Thank you for your question. It is always exciting to see someone exploring the intricacies of group theory.

First, let's define some terms for clarity:

- A group G is said to be simple if it has no proper nontrivial normal subgroups, meaning that the only normal subgroups of G are the trivial subgroup {e} and the whole group G itself.

- A normal subgroup H of a group G is a subgroup that is invariant under conjugation, meaning that for any element g in G, the conjugate of H by g (denoted by gHg^-1) is also a subgroup of G.

- The notation G/H denotes the quotient group of G by the normal subgroup H, where the elements of G/H are the cosets of H in G and the group operation is defined as (aH)(bH) = (ab)H for all a, b in G.

Now, let's consider the given situation: G is a group with normal subgroups H1 and H2, where H2 is not a subset of H1. We also have K = H1 ∩ H2, the intersection of H1 and H2.

We want to show that if G/H1 is simple, then G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K.

To do this, we will use the First Isomorphism Theorem, which states that if φ: G → G' is a group homomorphism with kernel K, then G/K is isomorphic to φ(G) (the image of G under φ).

In our case, we can define a homomorphism φ: G → H2/K by sending each element g in G to its coset gK in H2/K. This is indeed a homomorphism because for any two elements g1 and g2 in G, we have φ(g1g2) = (g1g2)K = (g1K)(g2K) = φ(g1)φ(g2).

Now, let's look at the kernel of φ. If g is in the kernel of φ, then φ(g) = gK = K, which means that g is in K. But K = H1 ∩ H2, so g is in both H1 and H2. This means that g is in the intersection of H1 and H2, which is K. Therefore, the kernel of φ is K.

Since H2 is
 

FAQ: Proof: G/H1 is Isomorphic to H2/K for G with Normal Subgroups H1 and H2

What is the definition of isomorphism?

Isomorphism is a mathematical concept that refers to the structural similarity between two objects. In the context of group theory, it means that two groups have the same underlying structure, even though their elements and operations may be different.

How do you prove that G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K?

To prove that G/H1 is isomorphic to H2/K, you need to show that there exists a bijective homomorphism between the two groups. This means that there is a one-to-one mapping between the elements of G/H1 and H2/K, and that this mapping preserves the group operation.

Why is it important to have normal subgroups in this proof?

Normal subgroups are important in this proof because they ensure that the quotient groups G/H1 and H2/K are well-defined and have the necessary properties for an isomorphism. Normal subgroups are also needed for the homomorphism to be well-defined.

Can you give an example of a group with normal subgroups that satisfies this proof?

Yes, one example is the group of integers under addition. Let H1 = 2ℤ (the even integers) and H2 = 3ℤ (the multiples of 3). Both H1 and H2 are normal subgroups of ℤ. The quotient groups ℤ/H1 and ℤ/H2 are isomorphic to ℤ/6ℤ, which is the group of integers modulo 6.

How does this proof relate to other concepts in group theory?

This proof is closely related to the concept of normal subgroups, quotient groups, and isomorphisms in group theory. It also highlights the importance of understanding the underlying structure of groups and how it can be preserved through different operations.

Similar threads

Back
Top