Proof: if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y

  • Thread starter samsun2024
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, using proof by contrapositive, it can be shown that if x≤y+ε for every ε>0, then x≤y. Taking ε=(x-y)/2 is a suitable choice for this proof.
  • #1
samsun2024
5
0
let x,y,ε in ℝ.
if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y

hints: use proof by contrapositive .

i try to proof it, and end up showing that...
if x+ε≤y for every ε>0 then x≤y
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Suppose, [itex]x > y[/itex]. Then, take [itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex]. Is the first inequality satisfied?
 
  • #3
Dickfore said:
Suppose, [itex]x > y[/itex]. Then, take [itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex]. Is the first inequality satisfied?

The contrapositive is [itex]x>y \Rightarrow x>y+ε[/itex]
[itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex] would not work:
[itex]x>y+ε \Rightarrow x>y+2 (x - y) \Rightarrow -x>-y[/itex], a contradiction unless [itex]x=y[/itex].
[itex]\epsilon = (x - y)/2[/itex] would work though.
 
  • #4
oleador said:
The contrapositive is [itex]x>y \Rightarrow x>y+ε[/itex]


*** No, it is not. The contrapositive is [itex]x>y\Longrightarrow x\nleq y+\epsilon[/itex] , for some [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex]

DonAntonio



[itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex] would not work:
[itex]x>y+ε \Rightarrow x>y+2 (x - y) \Rightarrow -x>-y[/itex], a contradiction unless [itex]x=y[/itex].
[itex]\epsilon = (x - y)/2[/itex] would work though.

...
 
  • #5
True. Confused [itex]\forallε>0[x≤y+ε]\Rightarrow x≤y[/itex] with [itex]\forallε>0[x≤y+ε\Rightarrow x≤y][/itex].
The former is true.

This, however, does not change my conclusion. [itex]ε=2(x−y)[/itex] doesn't work, while [itex]ε=(x−y)/2[/itex] does.
 

FAQ: Proof: if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y

What is the definition of "Proof: if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y"?

The statement "if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y" is a mathematical proof technique known as the "ε-delta" method. It is used to prove the limit of a function, where x approaches a certain value, by showing that the difference between the function and the limit value can be made arbitrarily small (denoted by ε) by choosing a small enough change in x (denoted by δ).

How is the "ε-delta" method used in mathematical proofs?

The "ε-delta" method is used to prove the limit of a function, where x approaches a certain value, by showing that for any ε>0, there exists a δ>0 such that if |x-a|<δ, then |f(x)-L|<ε, where a is the limit value and L is the limit of the function. This essentially means that as x gets closer and closer to a, f(x) gets closer and closer to L.

What is the significance of the statement "if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y" in mathematical proofs?

The statement "if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y" is significant because it is a necessary condition for proving the limit of a function using the "ε-delta" method. It ensures that the function is "approaching" the limit value as x gets closer and closer to a, rather than just being equal to the limit value.

What are the limitations of the "ε-delta" method in mathematical proofs?

The "ε-delta" method can only be used to prove the limit of a function at a specific point. It cannot be used to prove the existence of a limit or the continuity of a function. Additionally, it can be challenging to find the appropriate δ for a given ε, making the method difficult to use in certain cases.

Can the "ε-delta" method be used for all types of functions?

The "ε-delta" method can be used for most types of functions, but it may not be suitable for all types. It is most commonly used for continuous functions, but it can also be used for discontinuous functions if the limits from the left and right sides of the point are equal. It cannot be used for functions with vertical asymptotes or functions that do not have a limit at a specific point.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
507
Replies
1
Views
710
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top