Proof involving some inequality

In summary, the conversation discusses a difficulty with understanding an inequality involving three numbers and nine continuous functions. The first step is easily understandable, but the second step is more complicated due to the presence of the denominator n!. The example given shows that the difference between the second and first steps is related to the value of n and the functions involved. The conversation then concludes with a challenge to generalize this for any given constraints.
  • #1
Extropy
17
0
Difficulty with some inequality

Suppose that one has three numbers, [tex]v_j^0[/tex] for j=1, 2, and 3, and let their absolute values be less than or equal to 1. Suppose that one has nine continuous functions [tex]c_{jk}[/tex] all of which are bounded, and thus all of which are bounded by an amount [tex]\tfrac{k}{3}[/tex].

Define

[tex]v_j^{(1)}(s)=v_j^0+\int_0^s \sum_{k=1}^3 c_{jk}(\sigma) v_k^0 d\sigma[/tex]

and

[tex]v_j^{(n)}(s)=v_j^0+\int_0^s \sum_{k=1}^3 c_{jk}(\sigma) v_k^{(n-1)}(\sigma) d\sigma[/tex]

It is perfectly understandable why

[tex]|v_j^{(1)}-v_j^0| \le ks[/tex],

but not so clear why

[tex]|v_j^{(n)}-v_j^{(n-1)}| \le \frac{k^n s^n}{n!}[/tex].

Somehow, one is supposed to be able to divide by n, but I do not see how is able to.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If we set ##v_j^{(0)}=1## and ##c_{ji}=\dfrac{k}{3}## then we get ##v_j^{(1)}(s)=1+ks## and the one is the culprit for the denominator ##n!##. This is because in the second step we get ##v_j^{(2)}(s)=1+ks+\dfrac{k^2s^2}{2}## and the difference will be ##|v_j^{(2)}(s)-v_j^{(1)}(s)| =\dfrac{k^2s^2}{2}## and so on.

This example is somehow the worst case scenario, but it illustrates what happens. Now you have to generalize this for arbitrary ##c_{ji}(\sigma)## and ##v_j^{(0)}##, i.e. within the given constraints.
 

FAQ: Proof involving some inequality

What is an inequality?

An inequality is a mathematical statement that compares two quantities using symbols such as <, >, ≤, or ≥. It indicates that one quantity is larger or smaller than the other.

How can I prove an inequality?

To prove an inequality, you can use various mathematical techniques such as substitution, algebraic manipulation, or mathematical induction. It is important to follow the rules of mathematical logic and ensure that each step is valid.

What is the difference between a strict and non-strict inequality?

In a strict inequality, the two quantities being compared are not equal, while in a non-strict inequality, the two quantities can be equal. For example, 5 > 3 is a strict inequality, while 5 ≥ 3 is a non-strict inequality.

Can I use the same techniques to prove all types of inequalities?

While many inequalities can be proven using similar techniques, some may require specific methods. For example, proving an inequality involving absolute values may require using the definition of absolute value or the triangle inequality.

Are there any common mistakes to avoid when proving inequalities?

Some common mistakes to avoid when proving inequalities include assuming that the inequality holds true for all values without proper justification, using incorrect algebraic manipulations, or making faulty logical conclusions. It is important to carefully check each step and ensure that it follows the rules of mathematical logic.

Back
Top