Proof of Bland's Example 13: Simple Modules and Quotients of Maximal Modules

In summary, Bland's example shows that if a module contains a maximal submodule, then the module is a simple R-module.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Chapter 1, Section 1.4 Modules ... ...

I need help with the proving a statement Bland makes in Example 13 ... ...

Example 13 reads as follows:View attachment 6387In the above text from Bland, we read the following:

" ... If \(\displaystyle N\) is a maximal submodule of \(\displaystyle M\), then it follows that \(\displaystyle M/N\) is a simple \(\displaystyle R\)-module ... ... "I do not understand why this is true ... can anyone help with a formal proof of this statement ...
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let $\Sigma$ be a submodule of $M/N$. It must be shown that $\Sigma$ is either zero or the whole module $M/N$. Its pre-image $S$ under the natural projection $M\to M/N$ is a submodule of $M$ containing $N$. Maximality of $N$ implies $S = N$ or $S = M$. If $S = N$, then $\Sigma$ is zero; if $S = M$, then $\Sigma = M/N$.
 
  • #3
Euge said:
Let $\Sigma$ be a submodule of $M/N$. It must be shown that $\Sigma$ is either zero or the whole module $M/N$. Its pre-image $S$ under the natural projection $M\to M/N$ is a submodule of $M$ containing $N$. Maximality of $N$ implies $S = N$ or $S = M$. If $S = N$, then $\Sigma$ is zero; if $S = M$, then $\Sigma = M/N$.

Thanks for the help, Euge ...

But ... can you help a bit further ...

You write:

" ... ... Its pre-image $S$ under the natural projection $M\to M/N$ is a submodule of $M$ containing $N$. ... ... "Can you explain why this is true ... can you indicate how this is proved ...

Peter
 
  • #4
You actually learned this already from the lattice isomorphism theorem. Let $\pi$ denote the natural projection. The module $N$ is contained in $S$, for if $n\in N$, then $\pi(n) = 0\in \Sigma$. Therefore $n\in \pi^{-1}(\Sigma) = S$. Since $n$ was arbitrary, $S$ contains $N$.
 
  • #5
[TIKZ]n[/TIKZ]
Euge said:
You actually learned this already from the lattice isomorphism theorem. Let $\pi$ denote the natural projection. The module $N$ is contained in $S$, for if $n\in N$, then $\pi(n) = 0\in \Sigma$. Therefore $n\in \pi^{-1}(\Sigma) = S$. Since $n$ was arbitrary, $S$ contains $N$.
Thanks Euge ... appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Related to Proof of Bland's Example 13: Simple Modules and Quotients of Maximal Modules

1. What is Bland's Example 13?

Bland's Example 13 is a mathematical proof that demonstrates the existence of simple modules and quotients of maximal modules in a given algebraic structure.

2. Why is Bland's Example 13 important?

This proof is important because it provides a concrete example of simple modules and quotients of maximal modules, which are fundamental concepts in algebraic structures and have many applications in various fields of mathematics and science.

3. How does Bland's Example 13 work?

The proof starts by defining an algebraic structure with certain properties, and then constructs a specific module that satisfies those properties. This module is then shown to be a maximal module, and its simple submodules and quotients are identified.

4. What are simple modules and quotients of maximal modules?

A simple module is a module that has no proper submodules. A quotient of a maximal module is a module that is obtained by dividing the maximal module by one of its proper submodules. In Bland's Example 13, these concepts are illustrated through the construction of a specific algebraic structure and module.

5. How can Bland's Example 13 be applied in other fields of science?

Bland's Example 13 has applications in various fields such as physics, chemistry, and computer science. It can be used to study the structure and behavior of complex systems, and to analyze and solve problems that involve algebraic structures and modules.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top