Proof of Chain Rule for Differentiation - Stoll, Theorem 5.1.6

In summary, the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation, as presented in Theorem 5.1.6 in Manfred Stoll's book, involves using the identities (3) and (2) to show that the equation g(f(t)) - g(f(x)) = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ] is true. This is done by considering the composition of the functions h(x) = g(f(x)) and using the definition of the difference of g functions.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I need help in understanding the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation, as presented in Theorem 5.1.6 in Manfred Stoll's book: Introduction to Real Analysis.

Theorem 5.6.1 in Stoll (page 173) reads as follows:View attachment 3925In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... By identity (3) and then (2),

\(\displaystyle h(t) - h(x) = g(f(t)) - g(f(x))\)

\(\displaystyle = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]
\)
... ... "
I cannot see how (formally) the following equation is true:\(\displaystyle g(f(t)) - g(f(x)) = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]\)Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case?

I would really appreciate some help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Peter said:
I need help in understanding the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation, as presented in Theorem 5.1.6 in Manfred Stoll's book: Introduction to Real Analysis.

Theorem 5.6.1 in Stoll (page 173) reads as follows:View attachment 3925In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... By identity (3) and then (2),

\(\displaystyle h(t) - h(x) = g(f(t)) - g(f(x))\)

\(\displaystyle = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]
\)
... ... "
I cannot see how (formally) the following equation is true:\(\displaystyle g(f(t)) - g(f(x)) = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]\)Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case?

I would really appreciate some help ... ...

Peter

It's because in the composition of the functions, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(x) = g \circ f(x) \end{align*}$, that would mean to have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(t) - h(x) = g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \end{align*}$.

But we ALREADY defined a difference in g functions as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g(s) - g(y) \end{align*}$, and thus that means to work out $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \end{align*}$, we must have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} s = f(t) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = f(x) \end{align*}$. Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(t) - h(x) &= g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \\ &= g(s) - g(y) | _{s = f(t), y = f(x) } \\ &= \left( s - y \right) \left[ g'(y) - v(s) \right] |_{s = f(t) , y = f(x) } \\ &= \left[ f(t) - f(x) \right] \left[ g'(y) - v(s) \right] \end{align*}$
 

FAQ: Proof of Chain Rule for Differentiation - Stoll, Theorem 5.1.6

What is the proof of the Chain Rule for Differentiation?

The proof of the Chain Rule for Differentiation, as stated by Stoll in Theorem 5.1.6, shows that if two functions are differentiable at a point, then the composite function is also differentiable at that point, and its derivative is equal to the product of the derivatives of the two functions at that point.

How is Theorem 5.1.6 used in mathematics?

Theorem 5.1.6 is used in mathematics to simplify the process of finding the derivative of composite functions. It allows us to break down a complex function into simpler functions and use their derivatives to find the derivative of the original function.

Can you explain the chain rule with an example?

Yes, the chain rule can be explained with an example. Let's say we have the composite function f(g(x)), where f(x) = x^2 and g(x) = sin(x). Using the chain rule, we can find the derivative of f(g(x)) by first finding the derivative of g(x), which is cos(x), and then multiplying it by the derivative of f(x), which is 2x. Therefore, the derivative of f(g(x)) is 2x*cos(x).

How does the Chain Rule relate to other differentiation rules?

The Chain Rule is an important rule in differentiation as it allows us to find the derivative of complex functions by using the derivatives of simpler functions. It is also related to the Product Rule and Quotient Rule, as it follows a similar pattern of multiplying the derivatives of individual functions to find the derivative of the composite function.

Is Theorem 5.1.6 applicable to all types of functions?

Yes, Theorem 5.1.6 is applicable to all types of functions as long as they are differentiable at a specific point. It does not matter if the functions are polynomial, trigonometric, exponential, or any other type, the chain rule can still be applied to find the derivative of the composite function.

Similar threads

Back
Top