Proof of G(D)(e^{rx}Y(x))=e^{rx}G(D+r)Y(x)

  • Thread starter 3.1415926535
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the conversation discusses the properties of the differential operator G(D) and how it can be proven for the specific case of G(D)=D^n. The individual would like to know the general proof and is looking for an answer with the same notation as in the proof provided. The conversation also mentions the resemblance of the proof to the representations of Lie groups and their Lie algebras.
  • #1
3.1415926535
80
0
As you might have already found out G(D) is a differential operator. I can prove this property for G(D)=D^n , but I would like to know the general proof.
I would like an answer with the same notation as I use in this following proof, Thank you in advance

[tex]G(D)(e^{rx}Y(x))=e^{rx}G(D+r)Y(x)[/tex]

Proof of
[tex]D^{n}(e^{rx}Y(x)))=e^{rx}(D+r)^{n}Y[/tex]

[tex]D^{n}(e^{rx}Y(x)))=(e^{rx}Y)^{(n)}=(e^{rx}Y)^{n}Y+\binom{n}{1}(e^{rx})^{(n-1)}{Y}'+...e^{rx}Y^{(n)}=e^{rx}(r^nY+(\binom{n}{1})r^{n-1}Y'+...Y^{(n)})=e^{rx}(r^{n}+(\binom{n}{1})r^{n-1}D+...+D^{n})Y=e^{rx}(D+r)^{n}Y[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks a bit like the representations of Lie groups and their Lie algebras commuting with the exponential function. If so, then I would look in that direction.
 

FAQ: Proof of G(D)(e^{rx}Y(x))=e^{rx}G(D+r)Y(x)

What is the significance of G(D)(e^{rx}Y(x))=e^{rx}G(D+r)Y(x) in science?

This equation is commonly used in mathematical models to describe the behavior of systems subject to a constant force or stimulus. It is often referred to as the "forced harmonic oscillator equation" and has applications in physics, engineering, and other fields.

How does this equation relate to the concept of "proof"?

In mathematics, "proof" refers to the process of logically demonstrating that a statement or equation is true. In this case, the equation G(D)(e^{rx}Y(x))=e^{rx}G(D+r)Y(x) can be proven using mathematical techniques such as substitution, simplification, and differentiation.

Can this equation be applied to real-world systems?

Yes, this equation has many real-world applications. For example, it can be used to model the motion of a mass on a spring, electrical circuits, or the behavior of chemical reactions.

What are some limitations of using this equation?

This equation assumes that the system being modeled is subject to a constant force or stimulus. It also assumes linearity, meaning that the output is directly proportional to the input. In real-world systems, these assumptions may not always hold true, leading to limitations in its applicability.

Are there any practical uses for this equation outside of science?

Yes, this equation can also be applied in other fields such as economics and finance to model the behavior of markets and investments. It can also be used in computer science for signal processing and data analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Back
Top