Proof of Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1 in Symmetric Groups

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathjam0990
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof Type
In summary, the formula "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" represents the conjugacy relation between the group element x and its conjugate ρ.Gxρ−1. In group theory, the conjugacy relation between two elements x and y of a group G is defined as the property that there exists an element g in G such that y=gxg−1. Two elements x and y of a group G are said to be conjugate if there exists an element g in G such that y=gxg−1. To prove the conjugacy relation "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" in a group, you must show that there exists an element g in G such that ρG
  • #1
mathjam0990
29
0
Let G be a subgroup of Sym(X) and ρ ∈ G. Prove that Gρ(x) = ρGxρ−1, where ρGxρ−1 = {ρgρ−1|g ∈ Gx}

What I Know: I need to somehow prove the left is contained in the right and the right is contained in the left.

What I Have Done: Well based on the definition of a stabilizer Gx I assumed that Gρ(x) = {g'(p(x))=p(x) | g' w/in G} Sorry, I'm not sure if that is correct or not.

Then for (Left contained in right): For all g' w/in G, g'(p(x)=p(x) ---> (g'p)(x)=p(x) ---> pg'p-1p-1p(x)=p(p(x))p-1p-1 (multiplied both sides by pp-1p-1)
--->pg'p-1(x)=x (by associativity for a group) and that is contained in pgp-1 which equals ρGxp−1

Haven't attempted the "right contained in the left" because I'm not even sure if I even did the initial part correctly, I feel like I messed up. Any help please??

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi mathjam0990,

Based on what you've written for $G_{\rho(x)}$, I take it that you haven't yet grasped the definition of the stabilizer. If $G$ is a group acting (on the left) on a set $S$, then for each $s\in S$, the stabilizer $G_s$ of $s$ is defined as the set of all elements of $G$ which fix $s$, i.e., $\{g\in G : gs = s\}$. In your prompt, you should have stated that $x\in X$.

Now if $a\in G_{\rho(x)}$, then $a\in G$ and $a(\rho(x)) = \rho(x)$. Thus $\rho^{-1}a\rho(x) = \rho^{-1}\rho(x) = x$; since $G$ is a subgroup of $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$ and both $a,\rho\in G$, then $\rho^{-1}a\rho\in G$. Therefore $\rho^{-1}a\rho\in G_x$, say $\rho^{-1}a\rho = b$ for some $b\in G_x$. Then $a = \rho b\rho^{-1}\in \rho G_x\rho^{-1}$.

Conversely, if $a\in \rho G_x \rho^{-1}$, then there is a $g\in G_x$ such that $a = \rho g \rho^{-1}$. Since $G$ is a subgroup of $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$ and $\rho, g\in G$, then $\rho g \rho^{-1}\in G$, i.e., $a\in G$. As $g(x) = x$, $a(\rho(x)) = \rho(g(x)) = \rho(x)$. Consequently $a\in G_{\rho(x)}$.
 
  • #3
Some things to keep in mind:

for any group $G$, and any element $g \in G$, the map $x \mapsto g^{-1}xg$ is an automorphism of $G$ (an isomorphism $G \to G$), called the inner automorphism induced by $g$.

So, if $H$ is any subgroup of $G$, then $gHg^{-1}$ is *also* a subgroup of $G$ (isomorphic to $H$).

In particular, if $H$ is the stabilizer of some element in a set $S$ that $G$ acts on, say $H = G_a$, for some $a \in S$, it seems that $gG_ag^{-1}$ must also be a stabilizer of "something" (some perhaps different element of $S$).

But what? Let us see if we can discover this. Let $h \in G_a$, so $h(a) = a$. We will try to find out which $s \in S$ (if any) that $ghg^{-1}$ stabilizes.

From $ghg^{-1}(s) = s$ we have (letting $g^{-1}$ act on both sides):

$hg^{-1}(s) = g^{-1}(s)$, that is: $h(g^{-1}(s)) = g^{-1}(s)$. So $g^{-1}(s)$ must be an element of $S$ that $H = G_a$ stabilizes. We only know of one such element, $a$ (this is the only bit that requires a little cleverness).

So if we set $g^{-1}(s) = a$, we know this will work. Now we can solve for $s$, by having $g$ act on both sides:

$g(g^{-1}(s)) = g(a)$
$(gg^{-1})(s) = g(a)$
$e(s) = g(a)$
$s = g(a)$.

Clearly, then, $gG_ag^{-1}$ stablizes $g(a)$. This shows that $gG_ag^{-1} \subseteq G_{g(a)}$.

I'll repeat this finding, for emphasis:

CONJUAGTES $ghg^{-1}$ of stabilizers $h$ of $a\in S$, stabilize the IMAGE $g(a)$.

To show $G_{g(a)} \subseteq gG_ag^{-1}$, we just work backwards:

Suppose $x \in G$ is such that $x(g(a)) = g(a)$.

Then $xg(a) = g(a)$, so $g^{-1}xg(a) = g^{-1}g(a) = a$. That is, $g^{-1}xg$ stabilizes $a$.

From $g^{-1}xg \in G_a$, we have $x = exe = (gg^{-1})x(gg^{-1}) = g(g^{-1}xg)g^{-1} \in gG_ag^{-1}$, and that's the end of this short television episode.
 

FAQ: Proof of Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1 in Symmetric Groups

1. What does the formula "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" mean?

The formula "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" represents the conjugacy relation between the group element x and its conjugate ρ.Gxρ−1.

2. How is the conjugacy relation defined in group theory?

In group theory, the conjugacy relation between two elements x and y of a group G is defined as the property that there exists an element g in G such that y=gxg−1.

3. What does it mean for two elements to be conjugate in a group?

Two elements x and y of a group G are said to be conjugate if there exists an element g in G such that y=gxg−1. This implies that x and y are related by a change of basis or coordinate system within the group.

4. How do you prove the conjugacy relation "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" in a group?

To prove the conjugacy relation "Gρ(x)=ρGxρ−1" in a group, you must show that there exists an element g in G such that ρGxρ−1=gxg−1. This can be done by manipulating the elements of the group and using the properties of conjugacy.

5. What is the significance of the conjugacy relation in group theory?

The conjugacy relation is an important concept in group theory as it allows us to understand the structure and behavior of groups. It also helps us to classify and identify different groups based on their conjugacy classes, which are sets of elements that are conjugate to each other.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
941
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top