- #1
evilpostingmong
- 339
- 0
Suppose T ∈ L(V) and U is a subspace of V. Prove that U is
invariant under T if and only if U⊥ is invariant under T∗.
Now for reference, L(V) is the set of transformations that map v (a vector) from V to V.
T* is the adjoint operator.
The case where the dimension of U is less than V bugs me. How can U⊥
be invariant under T* when T* maps from U⊥ to V unless mapping to V
also counts as mapping to U⊥ since U⊥ is in V itself. Now when
I say map to V, I mean let's say V is 3 dimensional and U⊥ is 1 dimensional.
Then u=(x3) gets mapped (by T*) to a vector with three nonzero components.
Does this count as mapping from U⊥ to U⊥?
I'm just a bit confused about this, and any help will be greatly appreciated.
I guess that I'm confused enough that my post doesn't make much sense,
so in that case, could someone nudge me in the right direction (ie give a good hint)?
Thank you!
invariant under T if and only if U⊥ is invariant under T∗.
Now for reference, L(V) is the set of transformations that map v (a vector) from V to V.
T* is the adjoint operator.
The case where the dimension of U is less than V bugs me. How can U⊥
be invariant under T* when T* maps from U⊥ to V unless mapping to V
also counts as mapping to U⊥ since U⊥ is in V itself. Now when
I say map to V, I mean let's say V is 3 dimensional and U⊥ is 1 dimensional.
Then u=(x3) gets mapped (by T*) to a vector with three nonzero components.
Does this count as mapping from U⊥ to U⊥?
I'm just a bit confused about this, and any help will be greatly appreciated.
I guess that I'm confused enough that my post doesn't make much sense,
so in that case, could someone nudge me in the right direction (ie give a good hint)?
Thank you!
Last edited: