Proof: Quick-Select Runs in Expected $O(n)$ Time

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary, the formula $t(n) \leq bn \cdot g(n)+t\left( \frac{3n}{4}\right)$ holds because it represents the expected running time of the randomized quick-select algorithm.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

I am looking at the proof that the randomized quick-select algorithm runs in expected $O(n)$ time.

View attachment 4443

View attachment 4444

View attachment 4445

Could you explain me why the formula $t(n) \leq bn \cdot g(n)+t\left( \frac{3n}{4}\right)$ holds?
 

Attachments

  • p1.PNG
    p1.PNG
    39.3 KB · Views: 74
  • pp2.PNG
    pp2.PNG
    26.9 KB · Views: 72
  • pp3.PNG
    pp3.PNG
    26.3 KB · Views: 72
Technology news on Phys.org
  • #2
The formula $t(n) \leq bn \cdot g(n)+t\left( \frac{3n}{4}\right)$ holds because the randomized quick-select algorithm makes a recursive call on a subarray of size $\frac{3n}{4}$, which means that the total running time must be bounded by the number of elements times the cost of each step plus the time needed for the recursive call. Specifically, it is bounded by $bn \cdot g(n)+t\left( \frac{3n}{4}\right)$, where $b$ is the cost of each step (which is constant) and $g(n)$ is the time to partition the array into subarrays (which is also constant).
 

FAQ: Proof: Quick-Select Runs in Expected $O(n)$ Time

What is the purpose of the "Proof: Quick-Select Runs in Expected $O(n)$ Time" research?

The purpose of this research is to formally prove the time complexity of the Quick-Select algorithm, which is commonly used for finding the kth smallest element in an unsorted array. This proof helps to solidify the algorithm's efficiency and can aid in its use in various applications.

What is the expected time complexity of the Quick-Select algorithm?

The Quick-Select algorithm has an expected time complexity of $O(n)$, meaning that it can find the kth smallest element in an unsorted array in linear time. This is significantly more efficient than other sorting algorithms, such as QuickSort, which has an average time complexity of $O(nlogn)$.

How was the proof for the Quick-Select algorithm's efficiency conducted?

The proof for the Quick-Select algorithm's efficiency was conducted using mathematical induction and probability theory. It involved analyzing the expected number of comparisons and partitioning steps needed to find the kth smallest element in an unsorted array of size n.

What are the key takeaways from the proof of Quick-Select's efficiency?

The key takeaways from the proof of Quick-Select's efficiency are that the algorithm has an expected linear time complexity, and it is more efficient than other sorting algorithms. Additionally, the proof can help in understanding the algorithm's behavior and optimizing its implementation.

What are the potential applications of the Quick-Select algorithm?

The Quick-Select algorithm can be used in various applications, such as finding the median or top-k elements in a dataset, selecting pivot elements in QuickSort, and solving the selection problem in computer science and statistics. It is also a fundamental building block in various algorithms and data structures.

Similar threads

MHB Explaining Proof of Quick-Sort's O(nlog n) Expected Running Time
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB How to Sort Elements of a Matrix in O(n) Time Complexity?
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Best-Case Running Time of QuickSort: $\Omega(n \lg n)$
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB A' is asymptotically faster than A
Replies
15
Views
7K
MHB Proving Asymptotic Bound: n*4^n=O(n!)
Replies
8
Views
2K
MHB Algorithm to Find Element of Order k in $\Theta(n)$
Replies
1
Views
1K
Loop Running Time: O(n) Not O(n2)
Replies
11
Views
3K
MHB Worst-case running time of algorithm
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Algorithm with time complexity o(n^2)
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB What Determines the Running Time of Kruskal's Algorithm?
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top