Proof that f(z) is in no point analytic

In summary, the problem is to prove that the function f(z) = z^(n)(z*)^(-m) where n, m ≥ 1 is not analytic at any point. This can be done using the criteria of analyticity, which states that a complex-valued function ƒ is analytic at a point if it can be expanded as a convergent power series in an open disk centered at that point. However, this function does not satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which are another criterion for analyticity, and thus cannot be analytic. This can be shown by using the Wirtinger derivatives, which state that if the partial derivative of f with respect to the complex conjugate of z is not equal to
  • #1
jennyjones
35
0

Homework Statement



I have to proof for a homework assignment that f(z) = z^(n)(z*)^(-m) where n, m ≥ 1 (are natural numbers) is in no point analytic.

Homework Equations



binomial function

The Attempt at a Solution



I found this wikipedia page, were they state that:
a complex-valued function ƒ of a complex variable z is said to be analytic at a if in some open disk centered at a it can be expanded as a convergent power series.

for which i think i need to use the binomial function.

But I'm not sure how to do this for the given function f(z)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
(z*) is the complex conjugate


If i look at the Lim (z->0) z/z* i would say that it does not exist because if i look let z approach 0 on the real axis i get 1, and if i let z approach 0 on the imaginary axis i get -1.

but now i think i have to look at the lim(z->0) z^n/(z*)^m and am not sure how to approach the powers.

thanx
 
Last edited:
  • #3
  • #4
So the function is analytic in a domain if it is differentiable at all points of the domain.
 
  • #5
There is yet another criterion based on the so called Wirtinger derivatives

see: http://wcherry.math.unt.edu/math5410/wirtinger.pdf

Roughly, if [itex] \frac{\partial f(z,\overline{z})}{\partial \overline{z}} \neq 0[/itex], then [itex]f[/itex] does not satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, and thus cannot be analytic.

Edit: Here [itex]\overline{z}[/itex] is the conjugate of [itex]z[/itex]
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Proof that f(z) is in no point analytic

What does it mean for a function to be analytic?

An analytic function is a complex-valued function that can be represented as a power series, meaning that it has a derivative at every point in its domain. This allows for the function to be approximated and calculated using calculus techniques.

Can a function be analytic at some points but not others?

Yes, a function can be analytic at some points but not others. This means that the function is not analytic at certain points in its domain, and therefore cannot be represented as a power series at those points.

How can I prove that a function is not analytic at any point?

To prove that a function is not analytic at any point, you can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations. If the partial derivatives of the function do not satisfy these equations, then the function is not analytic at that point.

What is the significance of a function not being analytic at any point?

A function not being analytic at any point means that it is not differentiable at any point in its domain. This can make it more difficult to work with and can limit the use of calculus techniques for approximating and calculating the function.

Can a function still be useful if it is not analytic at any point?

Yes, a function can still be useful even if it is not analytic at any point. There are many functions that are not analytic at any point but are still important in mathematics, such as the absolute value function. These functions may not be able to be approximated using calculus techniques, but they still have many useful properties and applications.

Similar threads

Back
Top