Proof the moon landings were fake

  • Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Moon Proof
In summary, the conversation discusses various theories and evidence related to the moon landing, including claims of a conspiracy and the existence of a secret base on the moon. The conversation also includes some joking and off-topic comments.
  • #1
Pengwuino
Gold Member
5,123
20
http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/moonlanding.html

As you can see... there is plenty of evidence contrary to the NASA lie of us landing on the moon.

http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/images/moonlanding06.jpg

Notice the crosshairs inserted by the NASA editing crew...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's freakin' hilarious. :smile: Thanks.
 
  • #3
Pengwuino said:
Notice the crosshairs inserted by the NASA editing crew...
Just because some bozo says Saturn is in the wrong position in the sky doesn't mean you should buy it. I've seen all these criticisms effectively debunked. The photo is clearly genuine.
 
  • #4
Pengwuino said:
http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/images/moonlanding06.jpg
Notice the crosshairs inserted by the NASA editing crew...

Hmm... those crosshairs seem to be a problem. Big problem in context with the picture. Other than that, the photo looks completely normal :-p :biggrin:.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I've seen that sound stage before and met that actor in person.
He's quite a good look alike for Buzz except that his palor is slightly off and he has the mole you know.

You see the real cover up isn't that we didn't go to the moon. The real cover up is that we did go to the moon and we found dark side moon base. At dark side Buzz became the first human ambassador to the greys and established relations between them and our government, or really more speceifically the greys and the Illuminati.
Buzz was a 30th degree mason you know.
I found out recently from David Ike that Richard C Hoagland is actually a grey in disguise who is attempting to deter people from finding out the truth by making an ass out of himself and discrediting the socalled "fringe" organizations.
Too many of us already know though and the truth is spreading like wild fire. You won't be able to continue hiding that much longer you Lousy Stinking Blue Blooded Bastards!
 
  • #6
Off topic, but how come the only avatar in this thread that doesn't look ape-like is TheStatutoryApe's?
 
  • #7
LOL :smile: ... if you zoom in on s1, you can see a cosmanaut.. God love Peguin Humor
 
  • #8
BobG said:
Off topic, but how come the only avatar in this thread that doesn't look ape-like is TheStatutoryApe's?
lol
although have you ever seen TheStatutoryApe? probably still qualifies.
 
  • #9
BobG said:
Off topic, but how come the only avatar in this thread that doesn't look ape-like is TheStatutoryApe's?
Yours doesn't look like it swings from the trees very much.
 
  • #10
and yours doesn't look like it swings at all.

you know what? I'm feeling very confrontational lately. I apologize to everybody else I've said anything rude to.
 
  • #11
BobG said:
Off topic, but how come the only avatar in this thread that doesn't look ape-like is TheStatutoryApe's?
Hehehe. There is a certain resemblence between the one I have now and Motai's isn't there? I didn't notice that till you mentioned it.

I think SA's is a statue of "justice" isn't it. I guess he's gone for the "statutory" part of his username.
 
  • #12
tribdog said:
I apologize to everybody else I've said anything rude to.
No need. I don't think that there's any particular penalty for Assault With A Dead Weapon.
 
  • #13
TheStatutoryApe said:
I found out recently from David Ike that Richard C Hoagland is actually a grey in disguise who is attempting to deter people from finding out the truth by making an ass out of himself and discrediting the socalled "fringe" organizations.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/timages/page/Hoagland0425b.jpg

But you have it all wrong. The secret base is on Titan or Europa...according to Hoagland. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
Danger said:
Yours doesn't look like it swings from the trees very much.
No ape in their right minds would swing from the trees without his trusty pocket Pickett. How else would they calculate the minimum initial velocity needed to reach the next tree?

Edit: Anyone who has taken a Physics course knows, of course, that it's impossible for anyone or anything to swing from a vine without first using the Work-Energy Theorem.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
zoobyshoe said:
Hehehe. There is a certain resemblence between the one I have now and Motai's isn't there? I didn't notice that till you mentioned it.
I think SA's is a statue of "justice" isn't it. I guess he's gone for the "statutory" part of his username.
:frown: It's supposed to have a chimp's head. I guess I mangled the chimp image too much when I was trying to blend it into the rest of the image.
 

FAQ: Proof the moon landings were fake

1. How do you explain the lack of stars in the moon landing photos?

This is a common misconception. The cameras used during the moon landings were set to a fast shutter speed, making it difficult for faint stars to be captured in the photos. Additionally, the astronauts were standing on a brightly lit surface, making it even more challenging to see the stars in the background.

2. Why is there no blast crater under the lunar module?

The lunar module was specifically designed to land on the moon's surface without creating a blast crater. The propulsion system used a low-pressure engine and the moon's surface is not as dense as Earth's, making it easier for the module to land without causing a crater.

3. How is it possible for the American flag to be waving in the wind on the moon?

The flag on the moon was designed with a horizontal rod to hold it up, giving the appearance of waving in the wind. The flag was also made of a thin fabric material, making it more susceptible to movement from the astronauts handling it.

4. Why is there no visible flame or exhaust from the lunar module's engines?

The engines on the lunar module used a different type of fuel and combustion process compared to traditional rocket engines. This resulted in a nearly invisible exhaust, making it difficult to see on camera. Additionally, there is no oxygen on the moon's surface for the engines to burn, so the exhaust would not be as noticeable as it would be on Earth.

5. How do you explain the shadows in the moon landing photos appearing to come from multiple light sources?

The shadows in the photos appear to come from multiple light sources due to the uneven and reflective surface of the moon. The sun's light was also reflected off the lunar module and the astronauts' suits, creating multiple light sources and causing the shadows to appear in different directions.

Similar threads

Apollo landings to be photographed
Replies
6
Views
3K
NASA My Friend thinks the moon landing was faked by NASA
Replies
2
Views
2K
Was America's moon expedition a fake?
Replies
7
Views
7K
Is asteroid mining the key to solving world economic problems?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Fake Moon Landing: Evidence, Flags & Remnants | Part 1-3
Replies
5
Views
6K
Examining the Evidence: Were the Moon Landings Real or Fake?
Replies
11
Views
5K
What are your thoughts on 'Ad Astra' and Will Smith's upcoming Gemini Man?
Replies
12
Views
3K
NASA NASA Scientist Fired - Promises Disclosure
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • Sticky
Kerbal Space Program Tutorial Series - Open Access to 1.7
2
Replies
48
Views
62K
What could be causing my rocket to never land on the moon?
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top