Proof: Twin Primes Always Result in Perfect Squares

In summary, if ##p## and ##p+2## are twin primes, adding 1 to their product will always result in a perfect square. This can be seen through the equation ##p(p+2)+1=(p+1)^2##, which is a perfect square. This holds true for any two integers that differ by two, and can be easily visualized geometrically. Therefore, the statement holds regardless of whether the integers are integers or not.
  • #1
Math100
802
222
Homework Statement
If ## 1 ## is added to a product of twin primes, prove that a perfect square is always obtained.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
Then we have ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##.
Thus, ## (p+1)^2 ## is a perfect square.
Therefore, if ## 1 ## is added to a product of twin primes,
then a perfect square is always obtained.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and fishturtle1
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks good to me. Stylistically, one might write "Thus, ##p(p+2)+1## is a perfect square." instead of "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square.".
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #3
… although the restriction to twin primes is unnecessary. As should be clear from the proof, it holds for any two integers that differ by two.

Edit: There is also a rather intuitive geometric interpretation: Make a square out of (p+1)^2 unit boxes. Take the top row containing p+1 unit boxes and place p of them in a column on the right side of the rectangle, thus leaving you with a rectangle of side lengths p and p+2 with a single leftover unit box.

Edit 2: Illustration
20220418_193630860_iOS.png


Edit 3: Even easier to see with ##q = p+1##, i.e.,
$$
(q-1)(q+1) = q^2 - 1 \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad q^2 = (q-1)(q+1) + 1.
$$

Edit 4: The generalisation being cutting a strip of width b from the top of a square of side length a and placing a portion of length a-b of the strip to the right of the square, leaving a rectangle with sides a-b and a+b and a square of side length b:
$$
a^2 = (a-b)(a+b) + b^2.
$$
Regardless of ##a## and ##b## being integers or not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara, SammyS and PeroK
  • #4
fishturtle1 said:
Stylistically, one might write "Thus, ##p(p+2)+1## is a perfect square." instead of "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square.".
This is more than a stylistic point: if you say "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square" then you are saying "because ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ## then ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square" which is not correct (note 1). The words "Then we have" are also not appropriate here because that is saying "because ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes then ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1##" which is not correct (note 2).

The proof simply needs to be:
Math100 said:
Suppose ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##, which is a perfect square.

Note 1: ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square independent of the fact that ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##.
Note 2: ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1## independent of whether ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
 
  • Like
Likes fishturtle1 and Mark44

FAQ: Proof: Twin Primes Always Result in Perfect Squares

What are twin primes?

Twin primes are two prime numbers that are only two numbers apart, such as 3 and 5, or 41 and 43. They are considered "twins" because they are very close to each other in the sequence of prime numbers.

Why do twin primes always result in perfect squares?

This is due to a mathematical relationship known as the "Goldbach's conjecture," which states that every even number can be expressed as the sum of two prime numbers. Since twin primes are only two numbers apart, one of them must be an even number, and the other must be an odd number. Therefore, the sum of the two twin primes will always result in an even number, which can be expressed as the product of two equal numbers (perfect square).

Is there a proof for this phenomenon?

Yes, there is a proof for this phenomenon. It was first proven by mathematician Christian Goldbach in 1742 and has since been further developed and proven by other mathematicians.

Are there any exceptions to this rule?

As of now, there are no known exceptions to this rule. However, it is still considered a conjecture and has not been formally proven as a theorem.

How is this phenomenon relevant in mathematics?

This phenomenon is relevant in mathematics because it helps us understand the patterns and relationships between prime numbers and perfect squares. It also has applications in number theory and cryptography.

Back
Top