Proper Time and Time Dilatation

AI Thread Summary
Proper time is defined as the time measured by a clock moving along with an observer, and it is indeed the time elapsed on that clock. The confusion arises because, in the context of special relativity, proper time is always less than the coordinate time measured in a stationary frame due to time dilation. The relationship dτ = dt/γ highlights that proper time (dτ) is affected by the Lorentz factor (γ), which accounts for the relative velocity between observers. In the observer's rest frame, where they are not moving, γ equals 1, making proper time equal to coordinate time. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the implications of time dilation in different reference frames.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
I am a little confused with the concept of proper time
Relevant Equations
.
I am a little confused with the concept of proper time: Using the invariance of the distance square in the Minkowski space, we can get the expression ##d \tau = \frac{d t}{ \gamma}## Now the problem:

Aren't the proper time the time measured by a moving clock? That is, if i am moving with speed v and carries with me a clock, "my" proper time is the time elapsed in my clock, right?

But, to the best of my knowledge, the time elapsed in a moving frame shouldn't be dilated? The so called time dilatation, so why the proper time in the expression above is lesser than the coordinate time?

The expression above has a special frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your rest frame, you are not moving, and thus ##\gamma = 1## and ##d\tau = dt##. There is no such thing as an inherently "moving frame", frames can only move relative to each other and you have to be careful in how you reference this.

In the frame where you move with speed ##v##, you indeed have ##d\tau = dt/\gamma## with ##dt## being the coordinate time differential in that frame.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top