Proper use of inequality symbols in equations to do with circular motion

In summary, the conversation discusses the proper use of inequality symbols in a problem involving a coaster car and its weight and reaction forces. The main concern is whether the inequality should be included in the calculation or not. The solution is to introduce the governing equation and argue that because the reaction force must be greater than or equal to zero, the expression must also be greater than or equal to zero. This is deemed logically sound and the person is satisfied with the explanation.
  • #1
Ebby
41
14
Homework Statement
What is the minimum initial speed of the rollercoaster such that it will complete the vertical loop without falling away?
Relevant Equations
F_net_centripetal = mv^2/R
G.P.E._initial + K.E._initial = G.P.E._final + K.E._final (assuming no friction losses)
The problem itself is easy. My question is regarding the proper use of inequality symbols.

loop1.jpg

loop2.jpg

loop3.jpg


I only need to do the first part to show where I am having the issue.

The forces I need to consider are the coaster car's weight ##W = mg## and the reaction ##A## of the tracks acting on it. With the car at the top of the loop, the reaction ##A## must be greater than or equal to zero or the car will have fallen away from the tracks: $$A >= 0$$
Ignoring the inequality for the moment (yes, this isn't very mathematical), I'll just take the case when: $$A = 0$$
The governing equation is: $$A + mg = \frac {mv^2} {R}$$
When ##A = 0##, I can solve for ##v##: $$v = \sqrt {gR}$$
And now I consult my intuition. I visualise the coaster performing the loop and I "see" that I must reinsert the inequality like this:$$v >= \sqrt {gR}$$
But this isn't very satisfactory. Surely I can do this inequality stuff so that one step in the calculation properly follows another - without any tricks. Perhaps I should introduce the governing equation like so: $$A = \frac {mv^2} {R} - mg$$
And then I could argue that because actually ##A >= 0## it must also be the case that: $$\frac {mv^2} {R} - mg >= 0$$
But I'm not sure this is logically sound... Can someone explain how to do this so it makes sense to me?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ebby said:
Perhaps I should introduce the governing equation like so: $$A = \frac {mv^2} {R} - mg$$
And then I could argue that because actually ##A >= 0## it must also be the case that: $$\frac {mv^2} {R} - mg >= 0$$
But I'm not sure this is logically sound... Can someone explain how to do this so it makes sense to me?
Looks perfectly logical to me. What worries you?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and PeroK
  • #3
haruspex said:
Looks perfectly logical to me. What worries you?
I think I'm ok with it now. I thought that there was some circular logic in there, but on further consideration I think it's all right.

Thanks :)
 

FAQ: Proper use of inequality symbols in equations to do with circular motion

What are the basic inequality symbols used in equations involving circular motion?

The basic inequality symbols used in equations involving circular motion are the less than (<), greater than (>), less than or equal to (≤), and greater than or equal to (≥) symbols. These symbols help compare quantities such as angular velocity, centripetal force, and radius to ensure the physical constraints and conditions of circular motion are met.

How do you use inequality symbols to express the condition for centripetal force in circular motion?

In circular motion, the centripetal force must be sufficient to keep an object moving in a circular path. This condition can be expressed using inequality symbols. For example, if \( F_c \) represents the centripetal force and \( F_{min} \) is the minimum required force, the condition can be written as \( F_c \geq F_{min} \). This ensures that the force is adequate to maintain the circular motion.

How can inequality symbols be used to describe the relationship between angular velocity and radius in uniform circular motion?

In uniform circular motion, the centripetal acceleration \( a_c \) is given by the equation \( a_c = \omega^2 r \), where \( \omega \) is the angular velocity and \( r \) is the radius. If there is a maximum allowable centripetal acceleration \( a_{c,max} \), the relationship can be expressed using an inequality: \( \omega^2 r \leq a_{c,max} \). This ensures that the angular velocity and radius combination does not exceed the maximum centripetal acceleration.

What role do inequality symbols play in defining safe speed limits for vehicles on curved paths?

Inequality symbols are crucial in defining safe speed limits for vehicles on curved paths. For example, if \( v \) is the vehicle's speed, \( r \) is the radius of the curve, and \( \mu \) is the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road, the condition for safe travel can be expressed as \( v^2 \leq \mu g r \), where \( g \) is the acceleration due to gravity. This inequality ensures that the vehicle's speed is within the safe limit to prevent skidding.

How are inequality symbols used to determine the maximum allowable radius for a given angular velocity in circular motion?

To determine the maximum allowable radius \( r_{max} \) for a given angular velocity \( \omega \) in circular motion, you can use the centripetal force equation \( F_c = m \omega^2 r \), where \( m \) is the mass of the object. If there is a maximum allowable centripetal force \( F_{c,max} \), the inequality \(

Back
Top