Proper vs. coordinate acceleration

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of acceleration in both Newtonian physics and General Relativity (GR). While both theories involve the acceleration of objects towards each other, in GR, an object in free fall is not considered to be accelerating in the same sense as in Newtonian physics. This is due to the fact that in GR, gravity is described as the curvature of spacetime, rather than a force. The conversation also touches on the concept of free fall and how it relates to proper acceleration, as well as the difference between an object and the ground accelerating towards each other.
  • #36
vanhees71 said:
Indeed, that's correct. Jump off the building, and you won't feel much as long as you are in free fall. The trouble only comes, when you hit the ground, but that's not a contradiction to the GR picture of free fall since at the moment you hit the ground you are no longer in free fall but subject to other interactions (mostly electromagnetic) ;-)).

To experience the correctness of the GR picture of free fall rather go to the IRS (rumor has it NASA offers the possibility some time in the future if you are willing to pay the price ;-)) than jumping off your window.
Thanks, I understand the terminology better now thanks to MTW.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
bob012345 said:
Fine. Jump off a building and don't worry about because your just in free fall along a geodesic which by definition has no proper acceleration. Good luck with that.
There are literally pop songs explaining that:

 
  • Like
Likes bob012345 and Nugatory
  • #38
A.T. said:
There are literally pop songs explaining that
Unfortunately, only peer-reviewed songs are acceptable sources for PF. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345 and Nugatory

Similar threads

Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
923
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top