Properties of 'less than" and "less than or equals"

  • I
  • Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Properties
In summary, Theorem 1.2.9 states that for all natural numbers a, b, and c, if a is less than or equal to b and b is less than or equal to c, then a is also less than or equal to c. In the above proof, the statement that a is less than b and a is equal to b leads to the conclusion that a is less than itself, which contradicts Part (1) of the theorem. This cannot be argued because substituting a for b in the inequality would result in a being less than itself, which is not possible according to Part (1) of the theorem.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I am reading Ethan D. Bloch's book: The Real Numbers and Real Analysis ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 1: Construction of the Real Numbers ...

I need help/clarification with an aspect of Theorem 1.2.9 (6) ...

Theorem 1.2.9 reads as follows:
?temp_hash=cd0435e2e2ade0b058500f4b7df2618f.png

?temp_hash=cd0435e2e2ade0b058500f4b7df2618f.png


In the above proof of (6) we read the following:

" ... ... Suppose that ##a \lt b## and ##a = b##. It then follows from Part (3) of this theorem that ##a \lt a## ... ... "Can someone please explain how Part (3) of Theorem 1.2.9 leads to the statement that ##a \lt b## and ##a = b \Longrightarrow a \lt a## ... ...

... ... ...

Further ... why can't we argue this way ...

... because ##a = b## we can replace ##b## by ##a## in ##a \lt b## giving ##a \lt a## ... which contradicts Part (1) of the theorem ...
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Bloch - 1 - Theorem 1.2.9 (6) - PART 1 ... ....png
    Bloch - 1 - Theorem 1.2.9 (6) - PART 1 ... ....png
    33.6 KB · Views: 501
  • Bloch - 2 - Theorem 1.2.9 (6) - PART 2 ... ....png
    Bloch - 2 - Theorem 1.2.9 (6) - PART 2 ... ....png
    44.9 KB · Views: 502
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
According to part(3) of theorem 1.2.9
for all a,b,c ∈ ℕ: if a<b and b<=c then a<c.
b = c implies b<=c , and you can substitute a for c.
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
  • #3
Thanks for the post, willem2 ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Related to Properties of 'less than" and "less than or equals"

What is the difference between "less than" and "less than or equals"?

The symbol for "less than" is <, while the symbol for "less than or equals" is ≤. This means that "less than" only includes values that are strictly smaller than the given value, while "less than or equals" includes values that are smaller or equal to the given value.

How do you represent "less than" and "less than or equals" in mathematical equations?

For "less than", the symbol < is used, while for "less than or equals", the symbol ≤ is used. For example, the equation x < 5 means that x is smaller than 5, while the equation x ≤ 5 means that x is smaller or equal to 5.

Can "less than" and "less than or equals" be used for non-numeric values?

Yes, "less than" and "less than or equals" can be used for non-numeric values like strings or characters. In this case, the comparison is based on the alphabetical order of the values. For example, "apple" < "banana" and "apple" ≤ "apple" are both true statements.

How do the properties of "less than" and "less than or equals" affect mathematical operations?

The properties of "less than" and "less than or equals" affect mathematical operations by setting conditions on which values can be used in the operation. For example, if a mathematical operation involves "less than" or "less than or equals", the result will only be valid for values that fulfill the condition.

Are there any exceptions to the properties of "less than" and "less than or equals"?

Yes, there are some exceptions to the properties of "less than" and "less than or equals", such as when dealing with infinity or undefined values. In these cases, the comparison may not follow the usual rules and may require special considerations.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top