- #1
Whitishcube
- 83
- 0
Hi, my question is sort of a general work problem.
using that work is equal to the integral from x initial to x final of F dot dl, I'm having trouble trying to visualize why this works for a spring.
assuming, for example, a spring is stretched from equilibrium, the force of the spring is going to be in the negative direction (which i understand, since the force by a spring is -kx).
this is my problem. why isn't dl also a negative value? shouldn't it also be negative, like the force vector? it is, after all, an infinitesimally small change in the negative direction of the displacement. This agrees with my intuitive sense of work, because since the force vector and the displacement vector are both in the same direction, the work is positive. However, when defining dl as a positive value, its like saying theyre in the opposite direction, and therefore the work would be negative. Is there something I'm missing? some property of differentials that allow you to ignore this directional change? thanks for the input.
using that work is equal to the integral from x initial to x final of F dot dl, I'm having trouble trying to visualize why this works for a spring.
assuming, for example, a spring is stretched from equilibrium, the force of the spring is going to be in the negative direction (which i understand, since the force by a spring is -kx).
this is my problem. why isn't dl also a negative value? shouldn't it also be negative, like the force vector? it is, after all, an infinitesimally small change in the negative direction of the displacement. This agrees with my intuitive sense of work, because since the force vector and the displacement vector are both in the same direction, the work is positive. However, when defining dl as a positive value, its like saying theyre in the opposite direction, and therefore the work would be negative. Is there something I'm missing? some property of differentials that allow you to ignore this directional change? thanks for the input.