Prove: 1³ + 3³ + 5³ + 7³ + .... + T³ =

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mente oscura
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around different proofs for the statement "Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=\dfrac{[T(T+2)]^2-1}{8}" with various approaches being discussed, including induction, derivation, and using basic algebraic tools. There is also a mention of the theory of difference equations and the importance of being well-versed in different methods for solving problems.
  • #1
mente oscura
168
0
Hello.

[tex]Let \ T \in{N} \ / \ T=odd[/tex]

Prove:

[tex]1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+ ... +T^3=\dfrac{[T(T+2)]^2-1}{8}[/tex]

Regards.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

$$1^3+3^3+5^3+\cdots +T^3$$
$$=(1^3+2^3+3^3+\cdots +T^3)-(2^3+4^3+\cdots (T-1)^3)$$
$$=\frac{T(T+1)(2T+1)}{6}-8\Bigg(1^3+2^3+3^3+\cdots \bigg(\frac{T-1}{2}\bigg)^3\Bigg)$$
$$=\frac{T(T+1)(2T+1)}{6}-8\bigg(\frac{(\frac{T-1}{2})(\frac{T-1}{2}+1)(\frac{2T-2}{2}+1)}{6}\bigg)$$
Someone else can finish this off. I stopped trying. (Tongueout)
 
  • #3
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

My solution:

Let:

\(\displaystyle S_n=\sum_{k=1}^n\left((2k-1)^3 \right)\)

This gives rise to the linear inhomogeneous difference equation:

\(\displaystyle S_n-S_{n-1}=(2n-1)^3\) where \(\displaystyle S_1=1\)

We can easily see that the homogenous solution is:

\(\displaystyle h_n=c_1\)

and the particular solution will thus take the form:

\(\displaystyle p_n=n\left(c_2+c_3n+c_4n^2+c_5n^3 \right)=c_2n+c_3n^2+c_4n^3+c_5n^4\)

Substituting the particular solution into the difference equation, we may solve for the parameters using the method of undetermined coefficients:

\(\displaystyle \left(c_2n+c_3n^2+c_4n^3+c_5n^4 \right)-\left(c_2(n-1)+c_3(n-1)^2+c_4(n-1)^3+c_5(n-1)^4 \right)=(2n-1)^3\)

\(\displaystyle 4c_5n^3+\left(3c_4-6c_5 \right)n^2+\left(2c_3-3c_4+4c_5 \right)n+\left(c_2-c_3+c_4-c_5 \right)=8n^3-12n^2+6n-1\)

Equating coefficients, we obtain the system:

\(\displaystyle 4c_5=8\)

\(\displaystyle 3c_4-6c_5=-12\)

\(\displaystyle 2c_3-3c_4+4c_5=6\)

\(\displaystyle c_2-c_3+c_4-c_5=-1\)

From this we obtain:

\(\displaystyle \left(c_2,c_3,c_4,c_5 \right)=(2,-1,0,0)\)

Hence, the particular solution is:

\(\displaystyle p_n=2n^4-n^2\)

Hence the general solution to the difference is:

\(\displaystyle S_n=h_n+p_n=c_1+2n^4-n^2\)

Using the initial value, we may determine the value of the parameter $c_1$:

\(\displaystyle S_1=c_1+2-1=c_1+1=1\implies c_1=0\)

Hence, the solution satisfying all conditions is:

\(\displaystyle S_n=2n^4-n^2=\frac{16n^4-8n^2+1-1}{8}=\frac{\left(4n^2-1 \right)^2-1}{8}=\frac{\left((2n-1)(2n+1) \right)^2-1}{8}\)

With $T\equiv2n-1$, we may state:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^n\left((2n-1)^3 \right)=\frac{(T(T+2))^2-1}{8}\)
 
  • #4
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

With all due respect to MarkFL, the simplest proof is
via induction:

Let $T = 2n + 1$. We must then show for all $n \in \Bbb N$:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^n (2k + 1)^3 = \frac{[(2n + 1)(2n + 3)]^2 - 1}{8}$

Clearly, we have, for $n = 0$:

$1^3 = \dfrac{[(1)(3)]^2 - 1}{8} = \dfrac{9 - 1}{8} = \dfrac{8}{8} = 1$.

Assume that for $n = m$, we have:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^m (2k + 1)^3 = \frac{[(2m + 1)(2m + 3)]^2 - 1}{8}$

Then:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^{m+1} (2k + 1)^3 = \left(\sum_{k = 0}^m (2k + 1)^3\right) + (2m + 3)^3$

$\displaystyle = \frac{[(2m + 1)(2m + 3)]^2 - 1}{8} + \frac{8(2m + 3)^3}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[(2m + 1)^2 + 8(2m + 3)] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[4m^2 + 4m + 1 + 16m + 24] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[4m^2 + 20m + 25] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{[(2m + 3)(2m + 5)]^2 - 1}{8}$
QED.
 
  • #5
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Hello.

A picturesque prove:

[tex]1^3=1[/tex]

[tex]3^3=2+3+4+5+6+7[/tex]

[tex]5^3=8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17[/tex]

[tex]7^3=18+19+20+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28+29+30+31[/tex]

...

...

[tex]T^3=\dfrac{T^2-2T+1}{2}+ ... +\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

It would then be an arithmetic progression.

First term=[tex]\ 1[/tex]

Last term=[tex]\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

Total number of terms=[tex]\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

Solution:

[tex]1^3+3^3+...+T^3=\dfrac{(1)+(\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2})}{2} \ \dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}=[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{\dfrac{T^2+2T+1}{2}}{2} \ \dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}=[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{[T(T+2)]^2-1}{8}[/tex]

Regards.
 
  • #6
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

mente oscura said:
Hello.

A picturesque prove:

[tex]1^3=1[/tex]

[tex]3^3=2+3+4+5+6+7[/tex]

[tex]5^3=8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17[/tex]

[tex]7^3=18+19+20+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28+29+30+31[/tex]

...

...

[tex]T^3=\dfrac{T^2-2T+1}{2}+ ... +\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

It would then be an arithmetic progression.

First term=[tex]\ 1[/tex]

Last term=[tex]\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

Total number of terms=[tex]\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}[/tex]

Solution:

[tex]1^3+3^3+...+T^3=\dfrac{(1)+(\dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2})}{2} \ \dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}=[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{\dfrac{T^2+2T+1}{2}}{2} \ \dfrac{T^2+2T-1}{2}=[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{[T(T+2)]^2-1}{8}[/tex]

Regards.

As with many such proofs, I found your opening statements the most difficult to justify to myself. However:

[sp]\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{2T}\left[\frac{T^2 - 2T + 1}{2} + k-1\right]\)

\(\displaystyle = 2T\left(\frac{T^2 - 2T + 1}{2}\right) + \sum_{k=1}^{2T} k-1\)

\(\displaystyle = T(T-1)^2 + \sum_{j=1}^{2T-1}j\)

\(\displaystyle = T(T-1)^2 + \frac{(2T-1)(2T)}{2}\)

\(\displaystyle = T(T^2 - 2T + 1) + T(2T - 1) = T^3\)[/sp]

as you indeed claim, so I am satisfied :)
 
  • #7
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Deveno said:
With all due respect to MarkFL, the simplest proof is
via induction:

Let $T = 2n + 1$. We must then show for all $n \in \Bbb N$:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^n (2k + 1)^3 = \frac{[(2n + 1)(2n + 3)]^2 - 1}{8}$

Clearly, we have, for $n = 0$:

$1^3 = \dfrac{[(1)(3)]^2 - 1}{8} = \dfrac{9 - 1}{8} = \dfrac{8}{8} = 1$.

Assume that for $n = m$, we have:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^m (2k + 1)^3 = \frac{[(2m + 1)(2m + 3)]^2 - 1}{8}$

Then:

$\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^{m+1} (2k + 1)^3 = \left(\sum_{k = 0}^m (2k + 1)^3\right) + (2m + 3)^3$

$\displaystyle = \frac{[(2m + 1)(2m + 3)]^2 - 1}{8} + \frac{8(2m + 3)^3}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[(2m + 1)^2 + 8(2m + 3)] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[4m^2 + 4m + 1 + 16m + 24] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{(2m + 3)^2[4m^2 + 20m + 25] - 1}{8}$

$\displaystyle = \frac{[(2m + 3)(2m + 5)]^2 - 1}{8}$
QED.

Yes, being given the closed form, induction is indeed simpler and more straightforward. However, I wanted to derive the result instead. :D
 
  • #8
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Mostly a derivation is a little bit more satisfactory than a proof by induction. Well, at least for me (Sun)
 
  • #9
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

ZaidAlyafey said:
Mostly a derivation is a little bit more satisfactory than a proof by induction. Well, at least for me (Sun)

This is understandable...most inductive proofs come about by "already knowing the answer", which begs the question: "how did you find the answer in the FIRST place?"

Of course, one might make an "inductive leap" by observing what appears to be a pattern, but in many cases, the complexity grows so fast that it appears impossible to use such an approach "all the time".

I find mente oscura's proof a "middle ground", he does not use induction per se (although it is certainly lurking in the background with the closed form for an arithmetic progression), but it is still presented on more or less "elementary terms" using only basic algebraic tools.

That said, it is often the case that "sophisticated methods" are powerful tools for investigating structures much simpler than the more complicated settings they arise in. The better one is versed in such methods, the wider array of problems one is able to tackle with them.

One final note:

The theory of difference equations depends in an essential way on the ability to recursively define functions, the soundness of such an approach is actually equivalent to the principle of induction (without which no recursive definition would even be possible). Usually this is way,way in the background, and taken as given.

I myself am more fond of the "idiot's approach", perhaps a sign of my own limited imagination...certainly MarkFL's proof is impressive in its scope, and one I would not have thought of until I saw it. It has an undeniably "analytic" flavor, leading me to believe he is more at home with analytic methods than algebraic ones, and perhaps Zaid's enthusiasm for his proof indicates a similar propensity.

(When I took analysis, I enjoyed the theorems, but I simply *detested* the exercises, which seemed to me to be boring chores in symbolic manipulation).
 
  • #10
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Another approach is to use the Euler-Macluarin summation formula.

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n} (2n-1)^{3} = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (2n+1)^{3} = \int_{0}^{n} (2x+1)^{3} \ dx + B_{1} \Big((2n+1)^3 - 1 \Big) + \frac{B_{2}}{2!} \Big(6(2n+1)^2-6\Big) $$

$$ = \frac{1}{8} \Big((2n+1)^{4} -1 \Big) - \frac{1}{2} \Big((2n+1)^{3}-1 \Big) + \frac{1}{2} \Big((2n+1)^{2}-1 \Big)$$

$$ = \frac{(2n+1)^{4} - 4 (2n+1)^{3}+ 4(2n+1)^{2}-1}{8}$$

$$ = \frac{(2n+1)^{2}\Big( (2n+1)^{2}-4(2n+1)+4 \Big)-1}{8} = \frac{(2n+1)^{2}(2n-1)^{2}-1}{8}$$
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Best answer of all, RV. You're a genius. Period.
 
  • #12
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Hello.

I have opened a thread in which I expose a few formulas, in which I I've based, for this issue.

In Number Theory.

Regards.
 
  • #13
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=



Using this, notice that
[tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2^3 + 4^3 + 6^3 + \dots + \left( 2n \right) ^3 &= \left( 2 \cdot 1 \right) ^3 + \left( 2 \cdot 2 \right) ^3 + \left( 2 \cdot 3 \right) ^3 + \dots + \left( 2 \cdot n \right) ^3 \\ &= 2^3 \cdot 1^3 + 2^3 \cdot 2^3 + 2^3 \cdot 3^3 + \dots + 2^3 \cdot n^3 \\ &= 2^3 \left( 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + n^3 \right) \\ &= 8 \left\{ \frac{1}{4} \left[ n \left( n + 1 \right) \right]^2 \right\} \\ &= 2 \left[ n \left( n + 1 \right) \right] ^2 \end{align*}[/tex]

and thus, with [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} T = 2n + 1 \end{align*}[/tex], we have

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + \dots + T^3 &= 1^3 + 3^3 + 5^3 + \dots + \left( 2n + 1 \right) ^3 \\ &= \left[ 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + \left( 2n \right) ^3 + \left( 2n + 1 \right) ^3 \right] - \left[ 2^3 + 4^3 + 6^3 + \dots + \left( 2n \right) ^3 \right] \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \left[ \left( 2n + 1 \right) \left( 2n + 1 + 1 \right) \right] ^2 - 2 \left[ n \left( n + 1 \right) \right] ^2 \\ &= \left( 2n + 1 \right) ^2 \left( n + 1 \right) ^2 - 2n^2 \left( n + 1 \right) ^2 \\ &= \left( n + 1 \right) ^2 \left[ \left( 2n + 1 \right) ^2 - 2n^2 \right] \\ &= \left( \frac{T + 1}{2} \right) ^2 \left[ T^2 - \frac{\left( T - 1 \right) ^2 }{2} \right] \\ &= \frac{\left( T + 1 \right) ^2}{4} \left[ \frac{T^2 + 2T - 1}{2} \right] \\ &= \frac{\left( T + 1 \right) ^2 \left[ \left( T + 1 \right) ^2 - 2 \right] }{8} \\ &= \frac{ \left( T + 1 \right) ^4 - 2 \left( T + 1 \right) ^2 }{8} \\ &= \frac{ T^4 + 4T^3 + 6T^2 + 4T + 1 - 2T^2 - 4T - 2 }{8} \\ &= \frac{T^4 + 4T^3 + 4T^2 - 1}{8} \\ &= \frac{T^2 \left( T^2 + 4T + 4 \right) - 1}{8} \\ &= \frac{T^2 \left( T + 2 \right) ^2 - 1}{8} \\ &= \frac{\left[ T \left( T + 2 \right) \right] ^2 - 1}{8} \end{align*}[/tex]

Q.E.D. :D
 
  • #14
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Deveno said:
This is understandable...most inductive proofs come about by "already knowing the answer", which begs the question: "how did you find the answer in the FIRST place?"

Of course, one might make an "inductive leap" by observing what appears to be a pattern, but in many cases, the complexity grows so fast that it appears impossible to use such an approach "all the time".

I find mente oscura's proof a "middle ground", he does not use induction per se (although it is certainly lurking in the background with the closed form for an arithmetic progression), but it is still presented on more or less "elementary terms" using only basic algebraic tools.

That said, it is often the case that "sophisticated methods" are powerful tools for investigating structures much simpler than the more complicated settings they arise in. The better one is versed in such methods, the wider array of problems one is able to tackle with them.

One final note:

The theory of difference equations depends in an essential way on the ability to recursively define functions, the soundness of such an approach is actually equivalent to the principle of induction (without which no recursive definition would even be possible). Usually this is way,way in the background, and taken as given.

I myself am more fond of the "idiot's approach", perhaps a sign of my own limited imagination...certainly MarkFL's proof is impressive in its scope, and one I would not have thought of until I saw it. It has an undeniably "analytic" flavor, leading me to believe he is more at home with analytic methods than algebraic ones, and perhaps Zaid's enthusiasm for his proof indicates a similar propensity.

(When I took analysis, I enjoyed the theorems, but I simply *detested* the exercises, which seemed to me to be boring chores in symbolic manipulation).

At first glance when I saw the question I thought about induction. Usually I don't like the discrete and I am in favor of continuity. But as I am majoring in computer science it is becoming a must that I employ the discrete methods. The transformation from a discrete quantity to a continuous quantity and vice versa is usually an interesting question. Winding numbers in algebraic topology is an example of such interesting transformations.

PS: Sorry for the OP for the off-topic discussion but usually a proof by induction carries lots of discussions afterwards .
 
  • #15
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

A bit of justification on the solution I posted:

In my solution, I assumed the general solution would take the form:

\(\displaystyle S_n=An^4+Bn^3+Cn^2+Dn+E\)

This being the superposition of the homogenous and particular solutions. Recall I began with the linear difference equation (which I will arrange recursively):

\(\displaystyle S_n=S_{n-1}+(2n-1)^3\)

Let's expand the binomial:

(1) \(\displaystyle S_{n}=S_{n-1}+8n^3-12n^2+6n-1\)

We may of course also write the equivalent:

(2) \(\displaystyle S_{n+1}=S_{n}+8(n+1)^3-12(n+1)^2+6(n+1)-1\)

Subtracting (1) from (2) we obtain:

(3) \(\displaystyle S_{n+1}=2S_{n}-S_{n-1}+24n^2+2\)

(4) \(\displaystyle S_{n+2}=2S_{n+1}-S_{n}+24(n+1)^2+2\)

Subtracting (3) from (4) we obtain:

(5) \(\displaystyle S_{n+2}=3S_{n+1}-3S_{n}+S_{n-1}+48n+24\)

(6) \(\displaystyle S_{n+3}=3S_{n+2}-3S_{n+1}+S_{n}+48(n+1)+24\)

Subtracting (5) from (6) we obtain:

(7) \(\displaystyle S_{n+3}=4S_{n+2}-6S_{n+1}+4S_{n}-S_{n-1}+48\)

(8) \(\displaystyle S_{n+4}=4S_{n+3}-6S_{n+2}+4S_{n+1}-S_{n}+48\)

Subtracting (7) from (8) we obtain:

\(\displaystyle S_{n+4}=5S_{n+3}-10S_{n+2}+10S_{n+1}-5S_{n}+S_{n-1}\)

From this method of symbolic differencing, we now have a homogenous recursion whose associated characteristic equation is:

\(\displaystyle r^5-5r^4+10r^3-10r^2+5r-1=(r-1)^5=0\)

Since we have the characteristic root $r=1$ of multiplicity 5, we know the general solution must have the form:

\(\displaystyle S_n=An^4+Bn^3+Cn^2+Dn+E\)
 
  • #16
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Upon further reflection and reading of this thread, I feel my post is incomplete, as the picture I posted, while beautiful, only suggests a patterns and shows its statement is true for the first five natural numbers. Although the pattern is obvious, I don't feel it is proved...

View attachment 1813

If we are trying to prove [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + n^3 = \frac{1}{4} \left[ n \left( n + 1 \right) \right] ^2 \end{align*}[/tex] then Base Step ([tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} n = 1 \end{align*}[/tex]):

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} LHS &= 1^3 \\ &= 1 \\ \\ RHS &= \frac{1}{4} \left[ 1 \cdot \left( 1 + 1 \right) \right] ^2 \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \cdot 2^2 \\ &= 1 \\ &= LHS \end{align*}[/tex]

Assume the statement is true for [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} n = k \end{align*}[/tex], i.e. [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + k^3 &= \frac{1}{4} \left[ k \left( k + 1 \right) \right] ^2 \end{align*}[/tex]

Now show the statement is true for [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} n = k + 1 \end{align*}[/tex], i.e. show [tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + k^3 + \left( k + 1 \right) ^3 &= \frac{1}{4} \left[ \left( k + 1 \right) \left( k + 2 \right) \right] ^2 \end{align*}[/tex]

Inductive Step:

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \dots + k^3 + \left( k + 1 \right) ^3 &= \frac{1}{4} \left[ k \left( k + 1 \right) \right] ^2 + \left( k + 1 \right) ^3 \\ &= \frac{1}{4} k^2 \left( k + 1 \right) ^2 + \left( k + 1 \right) ^3 \\ &= \left( k + 1 \right) ^2 \left[ \frac{1}{4}k^2 + k + 1 \right] \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \left( k + 1 \right) ^2 \left( k^2 + 4k + 4 \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \left( k + 1 \right) ^2 \left( k + 2 \right) ^2 \end{align*}[/tex]

Q.E.D.
 

Attachments

  • sumofcubes.jpg
    sumofcubes.jpg
    57.9 KB · Views: 92
  • #17
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

I've always found it fascinating that:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n k^3 = \left[\sum_{k=1}^n k\right]^2$$
 
  • #18
Re: Prove: 1^3+3^3+5^3+7^3+...+T^3=

Do you think this is fascinating too :

$$\sum_{d|n} \tau(d)^3 = \left [ \sum_{d|n} \tau(d) \right ]^2$$

or

$$\sum_{k = 1}^n n^3 = \left [ \sum_{k = 1}^n n \right ]^2$$

And if you do, how about the multisets

$$\{1, 2, 2, 3, 5\}, \{3, 3, 3, 3, 6\}, \text{etc}$$

with the same property but in neither of the three classes, including the one you've given above. Also, [Hold you chair and don't freak out!]

$$\bigg \{\frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, \frac23, 2, 2, 10 \bigg\}$$

$$\{1 + 11678679130451250771390i, 10114032809617941274227 + 5839339565225625385695i\}$$

They have some strange properties, mostly of number theoretic interest, although there might be something for you here :

$$\{1, 2, 3\} \otimes \{1, 2\} = \{1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6\}$$

This operation forms a semigroup.

PS : All of these are recorded in MMF in 5 topics : http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=37609, http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=40594, http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=40612, http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=41547, http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=41825 [read by order].
 

FAQ: Prove: 1³ + 3³ + 5³ + 7³ + .... + T³ =

What is the formula for calculating the sum of odd cubes?

The formula for calculating the sum of odd cubes is given by 1³ + 3³ + 5³ + 7³ + .... + T³ where T is the last odd number in the series.

How can I prove that the sum of odd cubes follows a specific pattern?

The sum of odd cubes follows a specific pattern known as the Cube Number Sequence. This sequence can be proved by using mathematical induction, where we show that the formula holds true for a given number and then for the next number in the sequence.

Is there a shortcut method to calculate the sum of odd cubes?

Yes, there is a shortcut method known as the Sum of Cubes Formula. This formula states that the sum of the first n odd cubes is equal to (n * (n + 1) / 2)². This can be a quicker method to calculate the sum of odd cubes compared to adding each term individually.

Can the sum of odd cubes be represented in terms of other mathematical concepts?

Yes, the sum of odd cubes can be represented in terms of other mathematical concepts such as triangular numbers and square pyramidal numbers. This can provide further insights into the patterns and relationships within the Cube Number Sequence.

How is the sum of odd cubes used in real-world applications?

The sum of odd cubes has various applications in fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science. For example, it can be used to calculate the volume of a cube or to find the sum of forces in a mechanical system. It can also be used in algorithms and programming to optimize calculations and solve problems.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
837
Replies
2
Views
868
Replies
3
Views
950
Replies
1
Views
788
Replies
3
Views
913
Replies
1
Views
900
Back
Top