Prove 19 < S < 20: 2008/1000-2008/1009

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date
In summary, we can use the inequality $1 - x \le \frac 1 {1+x} \le 1 - x + x^2$ to prove that $19 < S < 20$, where $S = \sum_k \frac {2008}{1000 + k}$ and $x = 1000$. By manipulating the terms and using the upper bound of the inequality, we can prove that $S < 20$.
  • #1
Albert1
1,221
0
$ \text{S}=\dfrac {2008}{1000} + \dfrac {2008}{1001} + \dfrac {2008}{1002}+---------+\dfrac {2008}

{1009}$

$\text {prove} :\,\, 19 < \text {S} <20 $

note :no use of calculator or computer
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: prove : 19< S < 20

Albert said:
$ \text{S}=\dfrac {2008}{1000} + \dfrac {2008}{1001} + \dfrac {2008}{1002}+---------+\dfrac {2008}

{1009}$

$\text {prove} :\,\, 19 < \text {S} <20 $

note :no use of calculator or computer

Without a calculator... but it still takes some calculations.

Since $1 - x \le \frac 1 {1+x} \le 1 - x + x^2$,

and $S = \sum_k \frac {2008}{1000 + k} = \sum_k \frac {2008}{1000} \frac {1}{1 + (k/1000)}$,

it follows that

$$\sum_k \frac {2008}{1000} (1 - \frac k {1000}) \le S \le \sum_k \frac {2008}{1000} (1 - \frac k {1000} + (\frac k {1000})^2)$$

$$\frac {2008}{1000}(10 - \frac {\sum k} {1000}) \le S \le \frac {2008}{1000}(10 - \frac {\sum k} {1000} + \frac {\sum k^2} {10^6})$$

$$\frac {2008}{1000}(10 - \frac {10\cdot (0+9)/2} {1000}) \le S \le \frac {2008}{1000}(10 - \frac {10\cdot (0+9)/2} {1000} + \frac {\frac 1 6 10(10+1)(2\cdot 10 +1)} {10^6})$$

$$20.08 - \frac {45 \cdot 2008}{10^6} \le S \le 20.08 - \frac {45 \cdot 2008}{10^6} + \frac {2008 \cdot \frac 1 6 \cdot 10 \cdot 11 \cdot 19}{10^9}$$

$$19 \le 19.98 \le S \le 19.99 + 0.0006024 \le 19.9906024 \le 20 \qquad \blacksquare$$
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Re: prove : 19< S < 20

$ 19=\dfrac {10 \times 1919}{1010} < \dfrac {10 \times 2008}{1009}<S ----------(1) $

$ \therefore 19< S $

To prove S<20 is a little more tricky ,please try it ,I will upload later
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Re: prove : 19< S < 20

Albert said:
$ 19=\dfrac {10 \times 1919}{1010} < \dfrac {10 \times 2008}{1009}<S ----------(1) $

$ \therefore 19< S $

To prove S<20 is a little more tricky ,please try it ,i will upload later

Yeah, I got that one.
It was the 20 that I found trickier.
When I got that one, I took the lower bound along, since that was part of the upper bound anyway.
 
  • #5
Re: prove : 19< S < 20

$\text {Let} \,\, x=1000$
$S=(2x+8)[\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{x+1}+\dfrac{1}{x+2}+------------+\dfrac{1}{x+9}]$
$=(2x+8)[(\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{x+9})+------------+(\dfrac{1}{x+4}+\dfrac{1}{x+5}) ] $
$=(2x+8)[(\dfrac{2x+9}{x^2+9x}+------------+\dfrac{2x+9}{x^2+9x+20}) ] $
$=(2x+8)(2x+9)[(\dfrac{1}{x^2+9x}+------------+\dfrac{1}{x^2+9x+20}) ] $
$<(\dfrac{4x^2+34x+72}{x^2+9x})\times 5<(\dfrac{4x^2+36x}{x^2+9x})\times 5=4\times 5=20 $
$\therefore S<20$
 

FAQ: Prove 19 < S < 20: 2008/1000-2008/1009

What is the significance of the inequality "19 < S < 20" in the expression "2008/1000-2008/1009"?

The inequality "19 < S < 20" indicates that the value of S falls between 19 and 20. This is important because it sets the range for the possible values of S in the given expression.

How was the expression "2008/1000-2008/1009" derived?

The expression "2008/1000-2008/1009" is a mathematical representation of a specific calculation. In this case, it is likely that the expression was derived from a larger equation or problem that required this specific calculation.

Why is the year 2008 significant in this expression?

The year 2008 is likely significant because it is the number used in the numerator and denominator of the fractions in the expression. This could represent a specific year in a study or experiment, or it could simply be a placeholder number used for the purpose of the calculation.

How does the inequality "19 < S < 20" affect the overall result of the expression "2008/1000-2008/1009"?

The inequality "19 < S < 20" sets limitations on the possible values of S in the expression. This means that the result of the expression will fall within a specific range, rather than being any number. Essentially, this inequality provides context and helps to narrow down the potential outcomes of the calculation.

Can the inequality "19 < S < 20" be proven or disproven?

No, the inequality "19 < S < 20" cannot be proven or disproven as it is simply a statement of the range in which the value of S falls. It is a mathematical representation of the limitations and parameters set for the value of S in the given expression.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top