Prove a satisfaction with the wave equation

In summary: You can solve for the wavefunction by using the substitution method. You should get two equations in the final result.
  • #1
MKNA
5
0

Homework Statement


i want to prove that the functions u(r,t)=(1/r)f(r-v*t) and u(r,t)=(1/r)f(r+v*t) satisfy the wave equation in spherical coordinates, i have tried a lot to solve it but in each time i would face a problem.

Homework Equations


wave equation : grad^2(u)=(1/v)*(partial ^2 u/partial t ^2)

The Attempt at a Solution

i have tried to solve it in different ways but it does not work with me.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
it is v^2 not v
 
  • #3
What did you get after evaluating ##\nabla^2u##?
Since ##u## is not a function of ##\theta## and ##\phi##, the Laplacian operator will look like
$$
\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left( r^2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} \right)
$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MKNA
  • #4
blue_leaf77 said:
What did you get after evaluating ##\nabla^2u##?
i am rely sorry ,i am a new member here and i don't know how to write the symbols correctly ...((i found grad ^2 by saying that it equals the second partial derivative for u with respect to r)) .and i found the second partial derivative for u with respect to time. finally i could not match between them , usually when i evaluate the last i would find the first in it and so we can substitute here and reach to our goal,but it didn't work this time ,the question wants a general solution .a have solved such a question when u=sin(x-v*t) it was easy .
thank you so much ^-^
 
  • #5
MKNA said:
((i found grad ^2 by saying that it equals the second partial derivative for u with respect to r)) .and i found the second partial derivative for u with respect to time. finally i could not match between them
Your wave equation is correct, taking into account the correction you gave in post #2. If you can't match the left and right hand side then you must be doing something wrong. Since you said that you have calculated ##\partial^2 u/\partial t^2##, can you show what you got here?
 
  • #6
blue_leaf77 said:
Your wave equation is correct, taking into account the correction you gave in post #2. If you can't match the left and right hand side then you must be doing something wrong. Since you said that you have calculated ##\partial^2 u/\partial t^2##, can you show what you got here?
it goes like :
∂u/∂t=(1/r)(∂f/∂t)+(0)*f
=(1/r)(∂f/∂t)(-v)
∂²u/∂t²=(v²/r)*(∂²f/∂t²)
 
  • #7
MKNA said:
∂u/∂t=(1/r)(∂f/∂t)+(0)*f
=(1/r)(∂f/∂t)(-v)
∂²u/∂t²=(v²/r)*(∂²f/∂t²)
That doesn't seem to be quite correct, especially the way you arrived at the second line. From the first line you have ##\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}##. To do the partial derivative w.r.t ##t##, you would have to use the chain rule, upon which it will be
$$
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial (r-vt)} \frac{\partial (r-vt)}{\partial t} = \frac{-v}{r}f'(r-vt)
$$
where ##f'(r-vt) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial (r-vt)}##. Calculating ##\partial^2 u/\partial t^2##, what did you get?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MKNA
  • #8
blue_leaf77 said:
That doesn't seem to be quite correct, especially the way you arrived at the second line. From the first line you have ##\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}##. To do the partial derivative w.r.t ##t##, you would have to use the chain rule, upon which it will be
$$
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial (r-vt)} \frac{\partial (r-vt)}{\partial t} = \frac{-v}{r}f'(r-vt)
$$
where ##f'(r-vt) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial (r-vt)}##. Calculating ##\partial^2 u/\partial t^2##, what did you get?
i went through the first solution that you gave me,Since u is not a function of θ and ϕ as you have said ,and it is going real good ,i guess this is the best way ,i got two equation and i just have to substitute one in the other..thank you so much bro.
 

FAQ: Prove a satisfaction with the wave equation

How is satisfaction with the wave equation measured?

Satisfaction with the wave equation is typically measured through experimental data and mathematical models. This involves conducting experiments and collecting data to compare against the predicted results from the wave equation. If the results match up, it can be considered a successful proof of satisfaction.

What is the significance of proving satisfaction with the wave equation?

Proving satisfaction with the wave equation is significant because it confirms the validity and accuracy of the equation. This allows scientists to confidently use the wave equation in various fields of study, such as physics, acoustics, and engineering.

Are there any limitations to the wave equation?

Like any mathematical model, the wave equation has limitations and assumptions. It is a simplified representation of real-life wave behavior and may not accurately predict all scenarios. Additionally, it does not account for factors such as damping and non-linearities.

How does the wave equation relate to other equations in physics?

The wave equation is a fundamental equation in physics that describes the behavior of waves, such as light and sound. It is closely related to other equations, such as the Schrödinger equation, Maxwell's equations, and the heat equation.

Can the wave equation be applied to all types of waves?

The wave equation can be applied to many types of waves, including electromagnetic waves, sound waves, and water waves. However, it may not accurately describe all types of waves, such as shock waves or waves in highly viscous fluids.

Similar threads

Back
Top