Prove Chern-Simons Dispersion Relation | Carrol, Field, Jackiw

  • Thread starter Thread starter zwicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    chern-simons
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around proving a specific dispersion relation derived from a given equation involving a 3-component vector E. The equation connects the terms ω, k, and p, leading to the proposed dispersion relation. It is noted that the right-hand side of the original equation acts as a linear operator represented by a 3-by-3 matrix, which requires finding its eigenvalues. The matrix has a specific form, and its eigenvalues are identified as i|v|, 0, and -i|v|, with v defined in terms of k and p. The conversation concludes with expressions of gratitude and camaraderie among participants.
zwicky
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody!

Is there someone that can help me to prove that

<br /> \omega^2E-k^2E=-ip_0k\times E+i\omega p\times E<br />

imply that the dispersion relation is

<br /> (k^\mu k_\mu)^2+(k^\mu k_\mu)(p^\nu p_\nu)=(k^\mu p_\mu)^2<br />

Thanks in advance ;)

p.d. The reference for this formula is the paper of Carrol, Field, Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz and parity violating modification of electrodynamics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The right hand side is a linear operator on the 3-component vector E, so it can be represented by
a 3-by-3 matrix, and what you really need to do is find the eigenvalues of this matrix. It's a matrix of the form

<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; v3 &amp; -v2 \\<br /> -v3 &amp; 0 &amp; v1 \\<br /> v2 &amp; -v1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />​

In general, the three eigenvalues of this matrix are i|v|, 0 and -i|v|. In this case v = -ip_0k + i\omega p [/tex]. That will get you to the result quoted.<br /> <br /> Best<br /> <br /> Dave
 
Muiti obrigado Dave!

Best from Brazil!

Zwicky
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K