Prove Existence & Uniqueness for Diff. Eq. w/ Measurable Coeff. & RHS

In summary, the conversation discusses the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a differential equation with locally essentially bounded Lebesgue measurable functions. The approach to proving existence involves defining an operator and using Banach's fixed point theorem. The proof of uniqueness involves using the Grönwall's inequality and letting a variable approach infinity.
  • #1
bkarpuz
12
0
Dear MHB members,

Suppose that $p,f$ are locally essentially bounded Lebesgue measurable functions and consider the differential equation
$x'(t)=p(t)x(t)+f(t)$ almost for all $t\geq t_{0}$, and $x(t_{0})=x_{0}$.
By a solution of this equation, we mean a function $x$,
which is absolutely continuous in $[t_{0},t_{1}]$ for all $t_{1}\geq t_{0}$,
and satisfies the differential equation almost for all $t\geq t_{0}$ and $x(t_{0})=x_{0}$.

How can I prove existence and uniqueness in the sense of almost everywhere of solutions to this problem?

Thanks.
bkarpuz
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think this works, it's basically the same approach as with classical ODE's IVP: Define the operator $A:L^\infty[t_0,t_1] \to L^\infty[t_0,t_1]$, with $t_1>t_0$ to be defined, as $A(x)(t)=x_0+\int_{t_0}^{t_1} p(s)x(s)+f(s)ds$. It's easy to see $A$ is well defined as a mapping between these spaces and moreover we are looking for a fixed point, ie. $A(x)(t)=x(t)$, for this we use Banach's fixed point theorem: By Hölder's inequality we have

$$\| Ax-Ay\|_\infty \leq \| x-y\|_\infty \int_{t_0}^{t_1} |p(s)|ds$$

so for $t_1$ small enough we get a contraction and thus a solution in $[t_0,t_1]$ (that it's AC is obvious from the definition of $A$). We can apply this procedure again in $[t_1,t_2]$ and the operator $A_1(x)(t)=x_1(t_1)+\int_{t_1}^{t_2} p(s)x(s)+f(s)ds$ where $x_1$ is the solution in $[t_0,t_1]$. Continuing this way we can build a solution for all $t\geq t_0$ (If it had a finite supremum we apply the same argument, contradiction).

For uniqueness take two solution $x,y$, by uniqueness in the fixed point theorem we have $x=y$ in $[t_0,t_1]$, and so they coincide on every extension of these intervals, hence they coincide everywhere.
 
  • #3
Jose27 said:
I think this works, it's basically the same approach as with classical ODE's IVP: Define the operator $A:L^\infty[t_0,t_1] \to L^\infty[t_0,t_1]$, with $t_1>t_0$ to be defined, as $A(x)(t)=x_0+\int_{t_0}^{t_1} p(s)x(s)+f(s)ds$. It's easy to see $A$ is well defined as a mapping between these spaces and moreover we are looking for a fixed point, ie. $A(x)(t)=x(t)$, for this we use Banach's fixed point theorem: By Hölder's inequality we have

$$\| Ax-Ay\|_\infty \leq \| x-y\|_\infty \int_{t_0}^{t_1} |p(s)|ds$$

so for $t_1$ small enough we get a contraction and thus a solution in $[t_0,t_1]$ (that it's AC is obvious from the definition of $A$). We can apply this procedure again in $[t_1,t_2]$ and the operator $A_1(x)(t)=x_1(t_1)+\int_{t_1}^{t_2} p(s)x(s)+f(s)ds$ where $x_1$ is the solution in $[t_0,t_1]$. Continuing this way we can build a solution for all $t\geq t_0$ (If it had a finite supremum we apply the same argument, contradiction).

For uniqueness take two solution $x,y$, by uniqueness in the fixed point theorem we have $x=y$ in $[t_0,t_1]$, and so they coincide on every extension of these intervals, hence they coincide everywhere.

Jose27, thank you very much. Here is my approach, please let me know if I am doing wrong.

Existence. Pick some $t_{1}\geq t_{0}$, and define the operator $\Gamma:\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})\to\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ by $(\Gamma{}x)(t):=x_{0}+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}\big[p(s)x(s)+f(s)\big]\mathrm{d}s$ for $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$.
Obviously, $\Gamma\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})\subset\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$.
Let $\{y_{k}\}_{k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}}\subset\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ to be the sequence of Picard iterates defined by $y_{0}(t):=x_{0}$ for $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$ and $y_{k}(t)=(\Gamma{}y_{k-1})(t)$ for $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$ and $k\in\mathbb{N}$.

We may find two positive constants $M_{1}$ and $M_{2}$ such that $\|y_{1}-x_{0}\|_{\mathrm{ess}}\leq{}M_{1}$ and $\|p\|_{\mathrm{ess}}\leq{}M_{2}$ and show by induction that $\|y_{k}-y_{k-1}\|_{\mathrm{ess}}\leq{}M_{1}M_{2}^{k-1}\frac{(t-t_{0})^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}$ for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$.

Since the majorant series $\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}M_{1}M_{2}^{\ell}\frac{(t-t_{0})^{\ell}}{\ell!}$ converges to $M_{1}\mathrm{e}^{M_{2}(t-t_{0})}$, which is bounded above by $M_{1}\mathrm{e}^{M_{2}(t_{1}-t_{0})}$, we see that the sequence $\big\{y_{k}=x_{0}+\sum_{\ell=0}^{k-1}[y_{\ell+1}-y_{\ell}]\big\}_{k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}}$ converges uniformly due to Weierstrass $M$-test.
Let $y:=\lim_{k\to\infty}y_{k}$ (do we know here that $y\in\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$?), which implies that the fixed point of $\Gamma$ is $y$, i.e., $y=\Gamma{}y$ on $[t_{0},t_{1}]$, which shows that $x'(t)=p(t)x(t)+f(t)$ almost for all $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$ (actually, I need some clarification here, i.e., how the solution is absolutely continuous).

Uniqueness. Assume that there exist two solutions $x$ and $y$, define $z(t):=\mathrm{ess\,sup}_{t_{0}\leq{}s\leq{}t}|x(s)-y(s)|$ for $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$. Note that $z$ is nonnegative and monotone.
Then, we have $\|x(t)-y(t)\|\leq{}M_{2}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}p(s)z(s)\mathrm{d}s$ for all$t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$, which yields $z(t)\leq{}M_{2}\mathrm{ess\,sup}_{t_{0}\leq s\leq t}\int_{t_{1}}^{s}p(r)z(r)\mathrm{d}r\leq M_{2}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}p(s)z(s)\mathrm{d}s$ for all $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$.
By an application of the Grönwall's inequality, we see that $z(t)\leq0$ for all $t_{0}\leq{}t\leq{}t_{1}$, i.e., $x=y$ almost everywhere in $[t_{0},t_{1}]$.

Since $t_{1}$ is arbitrary, we may let $t_{1}\to\infty$ to complete the proof.

Thanks.
bkarpuz
 
  • #4
Is there a reference rather than Coddington & Levinson - Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, McGraw Hill, 1955, which presents Carathéodory's existence theorem?

Thanks.
bkarpuz
 
  • #5
bkarpuz said:
Dear MHB members,

Suppose that $p,f$ are locally essentially bounded Lebesgue measurable functions and consider the differential equation
$x'(t)=p(t)x(t)+f(t)$ almost for all $t\geq t_{0}$, and $x(t_{0})=x_{0}$.
By a solution of this equation, we mean a function $x$,
which is absolutely continuous in $[t_{0},t_{1}]$ for all $t_{1}\geq t_{0}$,
and satisfies the differential equation almost for all $t\geq t_{0}$ and $x(t_{0})=x_{0}$.

How can I prove existence and uniqueness in the sense of almost everywhere of solutions to this problem?

Thanks.
bkarpuz

Here is the complete proof.

Proof. Existence. Pick some $t_{1}\in[t_{0},\infty)$, and consider the differential equation
$\begin{cases}
x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(t)+f(t)\quad\text{almost for all}\ t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]\\
x(t_{0})=x_{0}.
\end{cases}$____________________________(1)
Now, define the corresponding integral operator $\Gamma:\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})\to\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ by
$(\Gamma{}x)(t):=x_{0}+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}\big[p(\eta)x(\eta)+f(\eta)\big]\mathrm{d}\eta$ for $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]$.
Obviously, $\Gamma\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})\subset\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$.
Let $\{y_{k}\}_{k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}}\subset\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ to be the sequence of Picard iterates defined by
$y_{k}(t):=
\begin{cases}
x_{0},&k=0\\
(\Gamma{}y_{k-1})(t),&k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}
\end{cases}\quad\text{for}\ t\in[t_{0},t_{1}].$___________________________(2)
We may find $M_{1},M_{2}\in\mathbb{R}^{+}$ such that $\|y_{1}-x_{0}\|_{\mathrm{ess}}\leq{}M_{1}$ and $\|p\|_{\mathrm{ess}}\leq{}M_{2}$ and show by induction that
$|y_{k}(t)-y_{k-1}(t)|\leq{}M_{1}M_{2}^{k-1}\frac{(t-t_{0})^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}$ for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$.
Since
$\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}M_{1}M_{2}^{\ell}\frac{(t-t_{0})^{\ell}}{\ell!}=M_{1}\mathrm{e}^{M_{2}(t-t_{0})}\leq{}M_{1}\mathrm{e}^{M_{2}(t_{1}-t_{0})}$ for all $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]$,
we see that the sequence $\big\{y_{k}=x_{0}+\sum_{\ell=0}^{k-1}[y_{\ell+1}-y_{\ell}]\big\}_{k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}}$ converges uniformly due to Weierstrass $M$-test.
Let $y:=\lim_{k\to\infty}y_{k}$, we have $y\in\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ since $\mathcal{L}^{\infty}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ is a complete Banach space.
Obviously, $y(t_{0})=x_{0}$. Letting $k\to\infty$ in (2) implies that the fixed point of $\Gamma$ is $y$, i.e., $y=\Gamma{}y$ on $[t_{0},t_{1}]$.
Due to the Fundamental theorem of calculus for the Lebesgue integral,
we see that $y\in\mathrm{AC}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$ and $y^{\prime}(t)=p(t)y(t)+f(t)$ almost for all $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]$.
The proof of existence of a solution to (1) is therefore completed.

Uniqueness. Assume that there exist two solutions $x,y\in\mathrm{AC}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R})$, define $z\in\mathrm{C}([t_{0},t_{1}],\mathbb{R}_{0}^{+})$ by
$z(t):=\sup_{\xi\in[t_{0},t]}|x(\xi)-y(\xi)|$ for $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}].$
Note that $z$ is monotone.
Then, we have
$|x(t)-y(t)|\leq{}M_{2}\int_{t_{0}}^{t}p(\eta)z(\eta)\rm{d}\eta$ for all $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}],$
which yields
$z(t)\leq M_{2}\sup_{\xi\in[t_{0},t]}\bigg\{\int_{t_{0}}^{\xi}p(\eta)z(\eta)\rm{d}\eta\bigg\}=0+M_{2}\int_{t_{0}}^{t}p(\eta)z(\eta)\rm{d}\eta$ for all $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]$.
By an application of the Grönwall's inequality, we see that
$z(t)\leq0\cdot\mathrm{e}^{M_{2}(t-t_{0})}=0$ for all $t\in[t_{0},t_{1}]$
showing that $x=y$ on $[t_{0},t_{1}]$.
Hence, the uniqueness of solutions to (1) is proved.

Since $t_{1}$ is arbitrary, we may let $t_{1}\to\infty$ to complete the proof of existence and uniqueness of solutions to
$\begin{cases}
x^{\prime}(t)=p(t)x(t)+f(t)\quad\text{almost for all}\ t\in[t_{0},\infty)\\
x(t_{0})=x_{0}.
\end{cases}$
 

FAQ: Prove Existence & Uniqueness for Diff. Eq. w/ Measurable Coeff. & RHS

What is the concept of "existence and uniqueness" in differential equations?

The concept of "existence and uniqueness" in differential equations is used to determine whether a solution to a given differential equation exists and whether it is unique. This means that there is only one possible solution to the equation that satisfies the given initial conditions.

What are the requirements for proving existence and uniqueness for differential equations with measurable coefficients and right-hand side?

The main requirements for proving existence and uniqueness for differential equations with measurable coefficients and right-hand side are that the coefficients and right-hand side of the equation must be measurable functions, and that the equation must also satisfy certain continuity and Lipschitz conditions. These conditions ensure that the solution to the equation exists and is unique.

How is the Picard-Lindelöf theorem used to prove existence and uniqueness for differential equations with measurable coefficients and right-hand side?

The Picard-Lindelöf theorem is a fundamental tool in proving existence and uniqueness for differential equations with measurable coefficients and right-hand side. This theorem states that if a differential equation satisfies certain conditions, then there exists a unique solution to the equation that satisfies the given initial conditions. It is often used in conjunction with other techniques, such as the method of successive approximations, to prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions.

What are the advantages of using measurable coefficients and right-hand side in differential equations?

Using measurable coefficients and right-hand side in differential equations allows for a more general and flexible approach to solving these equations. Measurable functions are more widely applicable than strictly continuous functions, and the continuity and Lipschitz conditions can often be easier to verify. This approach also allows for the use of more powerful theorems, such as the Picard-Lindelöf theorem, to prove existence and uniqueness.

Are there any limitations to proving existence and uniqueness for differential equations with measurable coefficients and right-hand side?

While using measurable coefficients and right-hand side in differential equations offers many advantages, there are also some limitations. These include the fact that not all differential equations can be solved using this approach, and that it may not always be possible to verify the necessary continuity and Lipschitz conditions for a given equation. Additionally, the solutions obtained using this method may not always be as smooth or well-behaved as those obtained using other techniques.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top