Prove $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$ with Triangle Sides

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a proof involving the lengths of sides of a triangle and two equations, $u=a^2+b^2+c^2$ and $v=(a+b+c)^2$. The goal is to prove that the fraction $\dfrac{1}{2}$ on the right cannot be replaced by a smaller number. The conversation notes that there was a typo in the second to last line, which has since been corrected.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Let $a,\,b$ and $b$ be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. Suppose that $u=a^2+b^2+c^2$ and $v=(a+b+c)^2$.

Prove that $\dfrac{1}{3}\le\dfrac{u}{v}\le\dfrac{1}{2}$ and that the fraction $\dfrac{1}{2}$ on the right cannot be replaced by a smaller number.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
we have $(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-a)^2 = a^2-2ab + b^2 + b^2-2bc + c^2 + c^2 -2ac + a^2$
$=(2(a^2+b^2+c^2 - ab + bc + ca) >=0$

or $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 >= ab + bc + ac \cdots(1)$

Now as a, b, c are sides of triangle we have

$a <= b + c$ or $a^2 <= ab + ac\cdots(2)$

similarly $b^2 <= ab + bc\cdots(3)$

and $c^2 <= bc + ac\cdots(4)$

adding (2) ,(3) , (4) we get $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 <= 2ab + 2bc + 2ca\cdots(2)$

Now we have $v = (a+b+c)^2 = (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab+bc+ca) <= (a^2+b^2+c^2) + 2(a^2+b^2+c^2$

or $ v <= 3(a^2+b^2+ c^2$

or $ v<=3u$

or $\frac{1}{3} < = \frac{u}{v}\cdots(5)$

Now for the 2nd part

$2u= u + u = (a^2+b^2+c^2) + (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ) <= (a^2+b^2+c^2) + 2(ab+bc+ca)$ using (2)

or $2u <= (a+b+c)^2$ or $2u <= v\cdots(6)$

from (5) and (6) we get the result
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hi kaliprasad, thanks for participating! But I was wondering if you have somehow missed out the solution to the very last part of the question...
 
  • #4
anemone said:
Hi kaliprasad, thanks for participating! But I was wondering if you have somehow missed out the solution to the very last part of the question...
There was a typo in 2nd last line it is corrected

I could not complete the part that fraction on the right cannot be replaced by a smaller number

other wise solution is complete
 
  • #5
About the last part of the question...
If $a=b$ and $c=0$ then $u=2a^2$ and $v=4a^2$. So $\frac uv = \frac12.$ Of course, you cannot have a triangle with one side zero. But suppose you take an isosceles triangle with sides $a$, $a$ and $\varepsilon$. Then $$2u - v = 4a^2 + 2\varepsilon^2 - (2a + \varepsilon)^2 = \varepsilon(4a - \varepsilon),$$ which you can make as small as you like by taking $\varepsilon$ small enough. So $v$ can be made arbitrarily close to $2u$ and thus $\frac uv$ can be made arbitrarily close to $\frac12.$
 

FAQ: Prove $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$ with Triangle Sides

1. How do you prove $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$ with Triangle Sides?

To prove this statement, we can use the Triangle Inequality Theorem. This theorem states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. In other words, for a triangle with sides a, b, and c, a + b > c, a + c > b, and b + c > a. We can rearrange these inequalities to get a > c - b, b > c - a, and c > a - b. Since our statement is in the form of fractions, we can rewrite it as $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v}$ and $\frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$. Using the Triangle Inequality Theorem, we can substitute the inequalities for a, b, and c to get $\frac{c-b}{c} \le \frac{u}{v}$ and $\frac{u}{v} \le \frac{c-a}{c}$. From here, we can simplify and rearrange to get $\frac{b}{c} \le \frac{u}{v}$ and $\frac{u}{v} \le \frac{a}{c}$. Since we know that b < a and c > 0, we can conclude that $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$.

2. Can you provide an example of a triangle that satisfies the given statement?

Yes, an equilateral triangle with side lengths of 6 units would satisfy the statement. Using the Triangle Inequality Theorem, we can see that 6 + 6 > 6, 6 + 6 > 6, and 6 + 6 > 6, which satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Plugging in the values for a, b, and c into our statement, we get $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{6}{6} \le \frac{1}{2}$, which is true since $\frac{1}{3} \le 1 \le \frac{1}{2}$.

3. Is the given statement always true for any triangle?

No, the statement is not always true for any triangle. It is only true for triangles that satisfy the conditions of the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In other words, the sum of any two sides of the triangle must be greater than the third side. If this condition is not met, then the statement may not hold true.

4. Can this statement be proven using other methods besides the Triangle Inequality Theorem?

Yes, there are other methods that can be used to prove this statement. One method is to use the Law of Sines, which states that for a triangle with sides a, b, and c and angles A, B, and C, $\frac{a}{\sin A} = \frac{b}{\sin B} = \frac{c}{\sin C}$. By solving for the sides in terms of the angles, we can see that $\frac{a}{\sin A} = \frac{b}{\sin B} = \frac{c}{\sin C} = \frac{2R}{\sin 2A} = \frac{2R}{\sin 2B} = \frac{2R}{\sin 2C}$, where R is the radius of the circumcircle of the triangle. From here, we can use the fact that the largest angle in a triangle is opposite the longest side, and the smallest angle is opposite the shortest side, to show that $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$.

5. How can this statement be applied in real-world situations?

This statement can be applied in many real-world situations, such as construction and engineering. For example, if someone is building a bridge or a roof, they need to make sure that the lengths of the sides of the structure satisfy the conditions of the Triangle Inequality Theorem to ensure stability and support. Additionally, this statement can be used in navigation and map-making, as it helps determine the shortest distance between two points on a map. It can also be used in physics and other sciences to calculate the forces and vectors involved in a system.

Back
Top