MHB Prove Moment of Inertia of Annulus w/ Radii 3m & 1m: 5m

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the moment of inertia of a uniform annulus with inner radius 1 meter and outer radius 3 meters. The area of the annulus is calculated, leading to the mass per unit area and the mass of a differential ring within the annulus. By applying integration techniques, the moment of inertia is derived using the formula I = (2M/(R^2 - r^2))∫x^3dx. After performing the integration and substituting the given values, it is confirmed that the moment of inertia equals 5m. The calculations and reasoning validate the initial claim regarding the moment of inertia of the annulus.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a uniform annulus consists of disc of radius 3 meters with a disc of radius 1 meters removed from its center. the mass of the annulus is m. Prove that the moment of inertia of the annulus about an axis through its center is 5m.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider an annulus whose inner radius is $r$ and outer radius is $R$, and has mass $M$. The area of the face of the annulus is:

$$A=\pi\left(R^2-r^2\right)$$

The mass per unit area is:

$$M_A=\frac{M}{A}=\frac{M}{\pi\left(R^2-r^2\right)}$$

Next, consider a ring within the annulus having inner radius $x$ and outer radius $x+dx$. The mass of this ring is:

$$M_R=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}x\,dx$$

We know the moment of inertia for this ring is:

$$I_R=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}x\cdot x^2\,dx$$

And so the moment of inertia for the annulus is:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\int_r^R x^3\,dx$$

Can you proceed to carry out the integration and derive the formula into which you can put the given values for $r$ and $R$?
 
i don't really know how to continue could you show me.
 
markosheehan said:
i don't really know how to continue could you show me.

Okay, we have:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\int_r^R x^3\,dx$$

So, we may apply the power rule:

$$\int u^r\,du=\frac{u^{r+1}}{r+1}+C$$ where $$r\ne-1$$

And the anti-derivative form of the FTOC:

$$\int_a^b f(u)\,du=F(b)-F(a)$$

And we obtain:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\left[\frac{x^4}{4}\right]_r^R=\frac{M}{2\left(R^2-r^2\right)}\left[x^4\right]_r^R=\frac{M}{2\left(R^2-r^2\right)}\left(R^4-r^4\right)=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)$$

Now, we are given:

$$r=1,\,R=3,\,M=m$$

And so:

$$I=\frac{m}{2}\left(3^2+1^2\right)=5m$$

Does that make sense?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top