Prove that ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1 ##.

  • Thread starter Math100
  • Start date
In summary, by using Fermat's theorem and observing that there are p-1 terms that are congruent to 1 mod p, we can prove that if p is an odd prime, then the sum of these terms is congruent to -1 mod p.
  • #1
Math100
802
222
Homework Statement
Employ Fermat's theorem to prove that, if ## p ## is an odd prime, then
## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## p ## is an odd prime such that ## p\geq 3 ##.
Note that ## p\nmid a ##.
By Fermat's theorem, we have that ## a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod {p} ##.
Observe that there are ## p-1 ## terms in ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1} ##.
This means
\begin{align*}
1^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
2^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
3^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
&\vdots \\
(p-1)^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv (p-1)\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
Therefore, if ## p ## is an odd prime, then ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Employ Fermat's theorem to prove that, if ## p ## is an odd prime, then
## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Suppose ## p ## is an odd prime such that ## p\geq 3 ##.
Note that ## p\nmid a ##.
... for all ##a\in\{1,2,3,\ldots,p-1\}.##
Math100 said:
By Fermat's theorem, we have that ## a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod {p} ##.
Observe that there are ## p-1 ## terms in ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1} ##.
This means
\begin{align*}
1^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
2^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
3^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}\\
&\vdots \\
(p-1)^{p-1}&\equiv 1\pmod {p}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv (p-1)\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
Therefore, if ## p ## is an odd prime, then ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1\pmod {p} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100

FAQ: Prove that ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1}\equiv -1 ##.

What is the context of this statement?

This statement is known as Fermat's Little Theorem, named after the mathematician Pierre de Fermat. It is a fundamental theorem in number theory that relates to the properties of prime numbers.

Can you explain the notation used in this statement?

The notation ## 1^{p-1}+2^{p-1}+3^{p-1}+\dotsb +(p-1)^{p-1} ## represents the sum of the (p-1)th powers of the first (p-1) positive integers, where p is a prime number. The symbol ≡ is used to denote congruence, meaning that the two expressions are equivalent modulo p.

How can this statement be proven?

This statement can be proven using mathematical induction. The base case, where p=2, is trivial. For the inductive step, assume the statement holds for some prime number p=k. Then, we can show that it also holds for p=k+1 by using the binomial theorem and some algebraic manipulation.

What are the implications of this statement?

Fermat's Little Theorem has many important implications in number theory, cryptography, and other areas of mathematics. It is often used as a tool to prove other theorems and has applications in fields such as coding theory and primality testing.

Are there any exceptions to this statement?

Yes, there are some exceptions to this statement. For example, if p is not a prime number, then the statement may not hold. Additionally, there are some special cases where the statement holds for non-prime values of p, such as when p is a Carmichael number. However, these exceptions are relatively rare and do not diminish the significance of Fermat's Little Theorem.

Similar threads

Back
Top