Prove that a function does not have a fixed point

In summary, the conversation is about proving that the function f(x) = 2 + x - $\tan^{-1}(x)$ has the property $\mid f'(x)\mid < 1$ and whether it has a fixed point or not. It is revealed that the function does have a fixed point, but the question is wrong because the value given for y does not result in a fixed point. The conversation ends with a request for further explanation, which states that the arctangent function returns values in a specific interval and the value given for y does not fall within that interval.
  • #1
Amer
259
0
it is a question in my book said

Prove that the function [tex]f(x) = 2 + x - \tan ^{-1} x [/tex] has the property [tex]\mid f'(x)\mid < 1 [/tex]
Prove that f dose not have a fixed point

but i found that this function has a fixed point

[tex] y = 2 + y - \tan ^{-1} y [/tex]

[tex]y = \tan 2 [/tex]

is it right that the question is wrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Prove that a function dose not have a fixed point

Hint: $\tan^{-1}(\tan 2)\ne 2$.
 
  • #3
Re: Prove that a function dose not have a fixed point

Evgeny.Makarov said:
Hint: $\tan^{-1}(\tan 2)\ne 2$.

can you explain more please
 
  • #4
Re: Prove that a function dose not have a fixed point

arctan.png


Since tan(x) is periodic, for each y (such as y = tan(2)) there exists an infinite number of x such that tan(x) = y. Therefore, a convention is needed to select a single value for $\tan^{-1}(y)$. By definition, arctangent returns values in the interval $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$, called principal values. Therefore, $\tan^{-1}(\tan(2))=2-\pi$.
 
  • #5


The question is not necessarily wrong, but it may be incomplete or misleading. It is important to fully understand the properties and assumptions of a function before attempting to prove or disprove any statements about it.

In this case, the given function f(x) = 2 + x - \tan ^{-1} x does have a fixed point at y = \tan 2, as you have correctly shown. However, the statement that \mid f'(x)\mid < 1 does not necessarily mean that the function does not have a fixed point.

The statement \mid f'(x)\mid < 1 means that the absolute value of the derivative of the function is always less than 1. This is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a function to have a fixed point. In other words, if a function does not have this property, then it definitely does not have a fixed point. However, just because a function does have this property, it does not guarantee that it will have a fixed point.

To prove that a function does not have a fixed point, we need to show that there is no value of x that satisfies the equation f(x) = x. In this case, we can see that y = \tan 2 is the only value that satisfies this equation, so the function does have a fixed point. Therefore, the original statement is incorrect.

In conclusion, it is important to carefully consider the properties and assumptions of a function before attempting to prove or disprove any statements about it. In this case, the function does have a fixed point and the given statement does not accurately reflect this fact.
 

FAQ: Prove that a function does not have a fixed point

How do you prove that a function does not have a fixed point?

There are a few methods for proving that a function does not have a fixed point. One way is to show that the function is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on its entire domain. This means that for any input, the output will always be either greater than or less than the input, making it impossible for the function to have a fixed point. Another method is to use the intermediate value theorem, which states that if a function is continuous and takes on both positive and negative values, then it must have at least one point where it equals 0. If the function does not have a fixed point, then it cannot have a point where it equals 0, thus proving that it does not have a fixed point.

Can a function have more than one fixed point?

Yes, a function can have more than one fixed point. This means that there are multiple points on the function's graph where the input and output are equal. For example, the function f(x) = x^2 has two fixed points at x = 0 and x = 1. However, not all functions have fixed points, and some functions may have an infinite number of fixed points, such as the function f(x) = sin(x).

What is the significance of a function not having a fixed point?

A function not having a fixed point means that there is no point on the function's graph where the input and output are equal. This can have various implications depending on the context of the function. For example, in the field of economics, a function without a fixed point may represent a market where supply and demand never reach equilibrium. In mathematics, functions without fixed points are useful for proving theorems and studying the properties of functions.

Can a function have a fixed point at infinity?

No, a function cannot have a fixed point at infinity. This is because infinity is not a real number and cannot be used as an input for a function. Therefore, a function cannot have a fixed point at infinity, but it can have a limit at infinity.

Are there any real-world applications of functions without fixed points?

Yes, there are many real-world applications of functions without fixed points. For example, in physics, functions without fixed points can represent systems that are constantly changing and never reach a stable state. In computer science, functions without fixed points are used in various algorithms, such as the Newton-Raphson method for finding roots of equations. They are also used in game theory to model situations where there is no optimal solution or equilibrium point.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
798
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
895
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
717
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top