Prove that Associates Have the Same Norm

  • Thread starter Frillth
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Norm
In summary, the conversation discusses the proof of the statement that any two quadratic integers that are associates must have the same norm. The norm of a quadratic integer is defined as N(α) = a^2 - b^2*d. The conversation explores the definition of associates, the properties of norms, and discusses the possibility of finding two associates with different norms. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that the original assumption that associates must have the same norm is incorrect, as evidenced by an example in Q[sqrt(2)].
  • #1
Frillth
80
0

Homework Statement



I need to prove that any two quadratic integers that are associates must also have the same norm.

Homework Equations



If α = a + b√d, the norm of α is N(α) = a^2 - b^2*d.

If two quadratic integers α and β are associates, α divides β, β divides α, and α/β and β/α both equal some unit, although each may be equal to a different unit.

N(unit) = ±1

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I've done so far:

α/β = ε
N(α/β) = N(ε)
N(α/β) = ±1
N(α)/N(β) = ±1
N(α) = ±N(β)

From here, I guess I need to show that it is impossible to have N(α) = -N(β), but I'm not sure how to do that. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sorry to go gravedigging here, but I just had a new idea. Is it even necessary that associates have the same norm?

α and β are defined as associates if α = β*ε

Thus, we can take any quadratic integer α in any quadratic field that has units that have negative norms, and multiply α by some unit ε with a negative norm to get β. Then when we take the norm we have:

N(α) = N(β*ε)
N(α) = N(β)*N(ε)
N(α) = -N(β)

Is all of my logic here correct? Because if so, it seems I may have been trying to prove a statement that is actually false.
 
  • #3
Can you actually find two such associates?

By the way, have you actually proved either [itex]N(\alpha /\beta)= N(\alpha)/N(\beta)[/itex] or [itex]N(\alpha\beta)= N(\alpha)N(\beta)[/itex]?
 
  • #4
I have proved all of your statements about norms.

In Q[sqrt(2)], 7 - 5*sqrt(2) has norm -1, which makes it a unit. I chose α = 2 + 2*sqrt(2) to test my initial assumption:

β = (2 + 2*sqrt(2))(7 - 5*sqrt(2))
β = -6 + 4*sqrt(2)

N(α) = -4
N(β) = 4

Did I do something wrong, or did I prove that my original assumption was incorrect?
 

FAQ: Prove that Associates Have the Same Norm

What is the definition of norm in mathematics?

The norm of a vector or matrix is a measure of its size or magnitude. It is commonly represented by ||x||, where x is the vector or matrix. In simpler terms, the norm is the length or size of a mathematical object.

How do you prove that two associates have the same norm?

In order to prove that two associates have the same norm, you must show that they have the same magnitude or length. This can be done by showing that they are equal in value, or by using mathematical properties and equations to demonstrate their equivalence.

What are associates in mathematics?

In mathematics, associates are elements that have the same norm or magnitude. They may have different representations or forms, but their size or length is equivalent.

Can two associates have different forms or representations?

Yes, two associates can have different forms or representations. For example, in complex numbers, 3 + 4i and 4 + 3i are associates because they have the same norm, even though their forms are different.

Why is proving that associates have the same norm important?

Proving that associates have the same norm is important because it allows us to simplify and manipulate mathematical expressions. It also helps us to identify equivalent elements in different forms, which can lead to more efficient problem-solving and mathematical operations.

Similar threads

Back
Top