- #1
AxiomOfChoice
- 533
- 1
Is there a simple way to prove this? I tried to use induction, but you get down to some horrible fraction (letting [itex]N = 2m[/itex] for some [itex]m[/itex]) in the inductive step:
[tex]
\begin{pmatrix} 2(m+1) \\ k \end{pmatrix} = \frac{(2m)!}{k!(2m - k)!} \cdot \frac{(2m+2)(2m+1)}{(2m+2-k)(2m+1-k)}
[/tex]
The inductive hypothesis is to assume the thing on the left is biggest for [itex]k = m[/itex], but the second fraction gets bigger as you make [itex]k[/itex] bigger. So...what to do! Any comments? Thanks!
[tex]
\begin{pmatrix} 2(m+1) \\ k \end{pmatrix} = \frac{(2m)!}{k!(2m - k)!} \cdot \frac{(2m+2)(2m+1)}{(2m+2-k)(2m+1-k)}
[/tex]
The inductive hypothesis is to assume the thing on the left is biggest for [itex]k = m[/itex], but the second fraction gets bigger as you make [itex]k[/itex] bigger. So...what to do! Any comments? Thanks!