MHB Prove Zeros & Poles of Meromorphic Function Have No Limit Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Prove that the zeros and the poles of a meromorphic function dose not have a limit point

Solution:
Let P be the set of the poles of f suppose that it has a limit point.
p is a pole of f so it is an isolated point such that \lim_{z \rightarrow p} \mid f(z) \mid= \infty
from isolated point definition there exist an R>0 such that f is analytic at the set B={z : 0<|z-p|<R }
but B is open and p in B, and B intersect U\{p} is not phi so f is not analytic at B
Contradiction

what about the set of zeros, and is my proof right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for useful link :)
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top