MHB Proving $2P(x)>P'(x)$ with Continuous Third Derivative of $P(x)$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality $2P(x) > P'(x)$ given that $P(x)$ has a continuous third derivative and that $P(x)$, $P'(x)$, $P''(x)$, and $P'''(x)$ are all positive for all $x$. It is established that if $P(x) > P'''(x)$ for all $x$, then this condition can be leveraged to demonstrate the desired inequality. The proposed solution involves analyzing the behavior of the derivatives and applying properties of continuous functions. The thread emphasizes the importance of the assumptions about the positivity and continuity of the derivatives in reaching the conclusion. Overall, the discussion aims to provide a rigorous proof of the stated inequality under the given conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $P$ be a real function with a continuous third derivative such that $P(x),\,P'(x),\,P''(x),\,P'''(x)$ are greater than zero for all $x$.

Suppose that $P(x)>P'''(x)$ for all $x$, prove that $2P(x)>P'(x)$ for all $x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solution proposed by other:

For simplicity, we will show $2P(0)>P'(0)$. Applying this result to $P(x+c)$ shows that $2P(c)>P'(c)$ for all $c$.

Since $P'(x)$ is positive, $P$ is an increasing function. Thus for $x\le 0$, $P'''(x)< P(x)\le P(0)$. Integrating $P'''(x)\le P(0)$ from $x$ to 0 gives $P''(x)\le P''(0)+P(0)x$ for $x\le 0$, and integrating again gives the second inequality in $0<P'(x)\le P'(0)+P''(0)x+P(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$. Thus the polynomial $P'(0)+P''(0)x+P(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$ has no negative zeros. It also has no nonnegative zeros (because all its coefficients are positive). Therefore its discriminant $P''(0)^2-2P(0)P'(0)$ must be negative.

In a similar vein, since $P'''$ is positive, $P''$ is increasing. Thus for $x\le 0$, $P''(x)\le P''(0)$, so $P'(x)\le P'(0)+P''(0)x$ and $0<P(x)\le P(0)+P'(0)x+P''(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$.

Again, the discriminant of the quadratic must be negative: $P'(0)^2-2P(0)P''(0)<0$.

Combining these conclusion, we obtain $P'(0)^4<4P(0)^2P''(0)^2<8P(0)^3P'(0)$, which implies $2P(x)>P'(x)$ for all $x$..
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top