Proving $a^2-3a-19$ is Not Divisible by 289

  • MHB
  • Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date
We use proof by contradiction.Suppose that $a^2-3a-19$ is divisible by $289$. Then we have $a^2-3a-19=289k$ for some integer $k$. Rearranging, we get $a^2-3a-19-289k=0$.This is a quadratic equation in terms of $a$ with discriminant $\Delta=(-3)^2-4(-19-289k)=9+4(308k)=9+1232k$.For the equation to have integer solutions, $\Delta$ must be a perfect square. However, $1232$ is not a perfect square, which means $\Delta$ cannot be a perfect square either. This
  • #1
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
1,335
0
Show that there is no integer a for which $a^2-3a -19$ is divisible by 289
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
kaliprasad said:
Show that there is no integer a for which $a^2-3a -19$ is divisible by 289
[sp]Proof by contradiction: Suppose that $a^2-3a -19$ is divisible by $289 = 17^2$. Since $a^2-3a -19 = (a+7)^2 -17(a+4)$, it follows that $(a+7)^2$ must be divisible by $17.$ But $17$ is prime, and therefore $a+7$ must be divisible by $17.$ So $a+7 = 17k$ for some integer $k$. But then $$a^2-3a -19 = (17k-7)^2 - 3(17k-7) - 19 = 289(k^2-k) + 51,$$ which is clearly not a multiple of $289$.[/sp]
 
  • #3
kaliprasad said:
Show that there is no integer a for which $a^2-3a -19$ is divisible by 289

\(\displaystyle a^2-3a-19=289k\)

\(\displaystyle \Delta=85+1156k=17(5+68k)\)

For $\Delta$ to be a perfect square \(\displaystyle 5+68k\) must have an odd power of $17$ in its prime factorization and so $5+68k$ must be divisible by $17$, but we see

\(\displaystyle 5+68k\equiv5\pmod{17}\)

and so \(\displaystyle a^2-3a-19\) is not divisible by $289$.
 
  • #4
2 good ans
here is mine

As a first step as we see that $289 = 17^2$

Now $a^2-3a-19 = (a-10)(a+7) + 51$

The 2nd term that is 51 is divisible by 17 and for the 1st term that is product
to be divisible by 17 either (a-10) or (a+7) is divisible by 17. but if one of them is
divisible by 17 then the 2nd one is also divisible by 17.

So 1st term is (a-10)(a+7) is divisible by 289 and 2nd term 51 is not divisible by 289
so sum is not divisible by 289. Or the 2nd term is divisible by 17 and 1st term is not
divisible by 17 so sum is not divisible by 17.
 
  • #5
My solution (which is much like Opalg's):

Reducing mod $17$, and using the quadratic formula (since $2 \not\mid 17$):

$a^2 - 3a - 2 = 0$ (mod $17$), therefore:

$a = 2^{-1}[-(-3) \pm \sqrt{(-3)^2 - 4(-2)}]= 9(3) = 10$ (mod $17$).

Using $a = 17k + 10$ in the original equation, we obtain:

$(17k + 10)^2 - 3(17k + 10) - 19 = 289m$

$289k^2 + 289k + 51 = 289m \implies 17(m - k - k^2) = 3$

but $17$ does not divide $3$.
 

FAQ: Proving $a^2-3a-19$ is Not Divisible by 289

How do you prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289?

To prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289, we can use the method of contradiction. Assume that $a^2-3a-19$ is divisible by 289, which means that there exists an integer k such that $a^2-3a-19=289k$. Rearranging the equation, we get $a^2-3a-19-289k=0$. We can then use the quadratic formula to solve for a, and if we can show that a is not an integer, this will contradict our assumption and prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289.

What is the significance of 289 in this equation?

289 is a perfect square, as it can be written as 17^2. When trying to prove that an expression is not divisible by a number, it is often useful to use a perfect square as the divisor, as it simplifies the calculations and allows us to focus on the properties of the expression itself.

Can you use a different method to prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289?

Yes, there are multiple methods that can be used to prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289. Another approach is to use modular arithmetic, specifically the concept of congruence. We can show that $a^2-3a-19$ is not congruent to 0 (mod 289), which would prove that it is not divisible by 289.

Are there any values of a that make $a^2-3a-19$ divisible by 289?

No, there are no values of a that make $a^2-3a-19$ divisible by 289. This can be shown using either of the aforementioned methods - if we assume that there is a value of a that makes the expression divisible by 289, we can easily reach a contradiction.

Why is it important to prove that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289?

Proving that $a^2-3a-19$ is not divisible by 289 is important because it helps us understand the properties of the expression and its relationship to 289. It also allows us to make conclusions about other similar expressions and their divisibility by 289. Furthermore, proving that an expression is not divisible by a certain number can also have practical applications, such as in cryptography and number theory.

Back
Top