Proving a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac: Understanding the Non-Distributive Property

  • Thread starter amy098yay
  • Start date
In summary, the problem statement is to verify using an example that a(b+c) is not equal to ab+ac, which means that addition does not distribute over the dot product. However, the attempt at a solution does not address this problem and instead uses division instead of multiplication, leading to an incorrect conclusion. Additionally, it is generally true that the dot product distributes over addition, making it impossible to find an example that satisfies the given conditions.
  • #1
amy098yay
23
0

Homework Statement


Verify using an example that a(b+c) is not equal to ab+ac. (This means that addition does not distribute over the dot product.)

Homework Equations


a(b+c)= ab+ac is ALWAYS true for whatever numbers you substitute

let a = 16
b = 3
and c = 5

The Attempt at a Solution



so LHE = a/(a + b) = 16 / (3 + 5) = 16/8 = 2
and RHE = (a/b) + (a/c) = (16/3) + (16/5) ≠ 2
so a/(a + b) ≠ (a/b) + (a/c)
LHE = a + (bc) = 16 + 3 x 5 = 16 + 15 = 31
RHE = (a + b)(a + c) = (16 + 3)(16 + 5) = 19 x 21 ≠ 31
so a + (bc) ≠ (a + b)(a + c)
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
a,b,c are vectors not numbers. You are using numeric division as well and that's not defined for vectors.

Your example needs to define three vectors a,b,c and show that addition does not distribute over the dot product.
 
  • #3
amy098yay said:

Homework Statement


Verify using an example that a(b+c) is not equal to ab+ac. (This means that addition does not distribute over the dot product.)

Homework Equations


a(b+c)= ab+ac is ALWAYS true for whatever numbers you substitute

let a = 16
b = 3
and c = 5

The Attempt at a Solution



so LHE = a/(a + b) = 16 / (3 + 5) = 16/8 = 2
and RHE = (a/b) + (a/c) = (16/3) + (16/5) ≠ 2 [/B]
This is very confusing. In your problem statement you say that you are asked to show an example for which a(b + c) is not equal to ab + ac. But in your attempt you have a/(a + b).
Are a, b, and c numbers, vectors, or what? Is the operation multiplication (dot product) or division?

amy098yay said:
so a/(a + b) ≠ (a/b) + (a/c)
LHE = a + (bc) = 16 + 3 x 5 = 16 + 15 = 31
RHE = (a + b)(a + c) = (16 + 3)(16 + 5) = 19 x 21 ≠ 31
so a + (bc) ≠ (a + b)(a + c)
 
  • #4
amy098yay said:
Verify using an example that a(b+c) is not equal to ab+ac.
It is very well known that if a, b, and c are vectors of the same dimension, then ##\vec{a} \cdot (\vec{b} + \vec{c}) = \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} + \vec{a} \cdot \vec{c}##
amy098yay said:
(This means that addition does not distribute over the dot product.)
This sentence doesn't agree with what you wrote. The dot product distributes over vector addition.
 
  • #5
If we let:

Vector A be in the y direction (Ax=0 , Ay=1 , Az = 0)
Vector B be in the x direction (Bx=1 , By=0 , Bz = 0)

so, Vector A×B components:

x = Ay * Bz - By * Az = 0
y = Az * Bx - Bz * Ax = 0
z = Ax * By - Bx * Ay = -1

so,

AxB = (0 , 0 , -1)

would this work?
 
  • #6
I don't know what you're doing. See my reply to your PM to me.

What is the exact statement of the problem? It seems to be about the properties of the dot product, but the work you're doing involves the cross product. Until we know exactly what you're trying to do, we're not going to be able to help you.
 
  • #7
Maybe take a picture of the problem from your book and post it here. You can use the UPLOAD A FILE button to do this.
 
  • #8
amy098yay said:
If we let:

Vector A be in the y direction (Ax=0 , Ay=1 , Az = 0)
Vector B be in the x direction (Bx=1 , By=0 , Bz = 0)

so, Vector A×B components:

x = Ay * Bz - By * Az = 0
y = Az * Bx - Bz * Ax = 0
z = Ax * By - Bx * Ay = -1

so,

AxB = (0 , 0 , -1)

would this work?
I replied in a PM to @amy098yay, but I'll include the gist of what I said here. The problem is ostensibly about the dot product, but the work above is A x B for the vector given above, so seems totally unrelated to the problem given at the start of this thread.

In any case, since the dot product distributes across the sum of vectors, it won't be possible to find an example for which ##\vec{a} \cdot (\vec{b} + \vec{c}) \neq \vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} + \vec{a} \cdot \vec{c}##, assuming that the vectors here are of the same dimension.
 
  • #9
amy098yay said:

Homework Statement


Verify using an example that a(b+c) is not equal to ab+ac. (This means that addition does not distribute over the dot product.)

Homework Equations


a(b+c)= ab+ac is ALWAYS true for whatever numbers you substitute

let a = 16
b = 3
and c = 5

The Attempt at a Solution



so LHE = a/(a + b) = 16 / (3 + 5) = 16/8 = 2
and RHE = (a/b) + (a/c) = (16/3) + (16/5) ≠ 2
so a/(a + b) ≠ (a/b) + (a/c)
LHE = a + (bc) = 16 + 3 x 5 = 16 + 15 = 31
RHE = (a + b)(a + c) = (16 + 3)(16 + 5) = 19 x 21 ≠ 31
so a + (bc) ≠ (a + b)(a + c)[/B]

What you have been asked to do is impossible; for either dot or cross products, the product DOES distributes over addition. What you tried to do in the above was to use division instead of multiplication---and it is, indeed true that usually ##a/(b+c) \neq (a/b) + (a/c)## (although it can hold in some special cases).

Who gave you this question to do? I hope it was not your instructor!
 

FAQ: Proving a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac: Understanding the Non-Distributive Property

1. What does the equation "a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac" mean?

The equation means that the product of a and the sum of b and c is not equal to the sum of the products of a and b, and a and c.

2. Why is it important to prove that a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac?

This proof is important because it demonstrates the distributive property of multiplication over addition, which is a fundamental concept in mathematics.

3. What is the mathematical proof for a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac?

To prove this equation, we can use the FOIL method to expand the left side of the equation, which results in ab+ac. This shows that the two sides are not equal and therefore, the equation is not true.

4. Can you give an example to illustrate why a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac is true?

Sure, let's take the values of a=2, b=3, and c=4. Plugging these values into the equation, we get 2(3+4) ≠ 2(3) + 2(4), which simplifies to 2(7) ≠ 6+8. This results in 14 ≠ 14, which shows that the equation is not true.

5. Are there any exceptions to the equation a(b+c) ≠ ab+ac?

No, this equation holds true for all real numbers a, b, and c. It is a fundamental principle in mathematics that has been proven to be true through various methods.

Back
Top